Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US general: New strategy needed to defeat Taliban - AP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 09:45 AM
Original message
US general: New strategy needed to defeat Taliban - AP
More escalation of the "good war"? Perhaps we should attack Cambodia to cut off the Taliban's supply sources...oh, wait.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090831/ap_on_re_as/as_afghanistan_235

KABUL – The commander of U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan said Monday in an assessment of the war that a new strategy was needed to fight the Taliban, while NATO officials disclosed he is expected to separately request more troops.

Increasing U.S. forces is a hot-button issue that could ignite furious debate in Washington on the U.S. military's future in an increasingly unpopular war. Some Democratic senators have increased calls for a timeline to draw down troops.

Gen. Stanley McChrystal sent his strategic review of the Afghan war to the Pentagon and NATO headquarters on Monday. U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates ordered the 60-day review to size up the rapidly deteriorating security situation in Afghanistan as Taliban attacks rise and U.S. deaths spiral upward.

"The situation in Afghanistan is serious, but success is achievable and demands a revised implementation strategy, commitment and resolve, and increased unity of effort," McChrystal said in a statement Monday.

Afghanistan has long been seen as the "good" war by many in the United States, especially in comparison with U.S. efforts in Iraq, where U.S. troops are now drawing down. But some Democratic senators are beginning to question whether U.S. goals in Afghanistan are achievable, and when U.S. troops will be brought home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Counterinsurgency (COIN) may be the only answer other than
complete withdrawal. It will reduce the killing but will take 10 to 20 years to accomplish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Do you have a case where COIN has worked in 10 to 20 years? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. a war against people who did nothing to the usa...meanwhile---
Yemen is falling apart threating Saudi Arabia and other countries. the bad guys who took down the towers left Afghanistan and have moved into Yemen. oh well....Yemen`s next!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. How about New Jersey? Didn't they discover some "terrorists" in N.J.?
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” H.L. Mencken
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. New strategy: RETREAT!!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. They could call it, "Strategic Reallignment" and cover their asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. +1
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. Here's a suggestion for a strategy: declare "victory" and withdraw! - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. Obama selected McChrystal because he had a new strategy but it's just old failed strategy with new
buzz words.

The only viable strategy is to declare "Mission Accomplished" and withdraw our troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC