|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:32 PM Original message |
Scalia Should Be Impeached For Incompetence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
1. Can you impeach them? Is there any recourse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. They can be impeached, just like the Pres. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Yeah, especially when there were high crimes and treason committed by Bush... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Allowing corporations to completely own our politicians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 03:49 PM Response to Reply #17 |
30. You mean like, generally speaking, the Congress is corrupt, mendacious, self-servicing, and wholly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-10-09 12:29 AM Response to Reply #3 |
33. Judges can be impeached for just about anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
create.peace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. my dh calls him scabies, or sometimes scalito...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wilt the stilt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
4. alzhimer's is my hope for Scalia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurrayDelph (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 03:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
28. My view of appropriate justice would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
6. Scalia is right. Corporations are people. And I really wanna fuck Wal-Mart. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. It's fucked up aint it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muntrv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
7. Gee Tony! That's mighty judicial activist of ya! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muntrv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
8. That means we can arrest corporations and send 'em to Gitmo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftHandPath (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:40 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Now yer talk'in!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Umbral (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 01:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. The notion of capital punishment takes on a whole new meaning. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PDJane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
9. Oh, shit........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
10. well, that was already determined by the courts years ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ctaylors6 (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:48 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. I loathe to defend in any way, but did he mean it for purposes of 1st amendment application |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 01:02 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Sorry, but I do not know the context of his quote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Davis_X_Machina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 01:38 PM Response to Reply #15 |
26. Santa Clara Co. v. Southern Pacific doctrine explicitly holds good... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
12. The concept is bullshit. Corporations are set up to limit personal liability |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
16. No, he should be impeached for other crimes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ctaylors6 (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:55 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. here's a great case if you want some background: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
19. ABSOLUTELY NOT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubledamerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-10-09 12:08 AM Response to Reply #19 |
32. YES. Impeach Scalia for conflicts of interest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-10-09 12:35 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Exactly. I agree completely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imdjh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
20. His dinner should always be cold. Where are the activist waiters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
23. amen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
24. ...or worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Davis_X_Machina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
25. The statement by the Court in Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam kane (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 02:53 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. the bitter irony of the 14th amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
29. Fire that corporate motherfucker!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
31. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-10-09 03:57 AM Response to Original message |
35. K&+R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC