|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 05:38 PM Original message |
DOD official: New bomb has 'important capability' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeHereNow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. ENOUGH of this bomb making crap! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. Can we please cut defense spending now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
3. "massive penetrator bomb"... no comment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 05:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. It putting a hole into the moon would probably not be dubbed anticlimatic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
4. Hey! We gotta pop those cherries! Penetrate those virgin mountains... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thunder rising (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
6. "underground facilities to hide and protect some of his military technology"..like that palatial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 05:51 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Yes, all of the supposed underground facilities turned out to be questionable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
7. More capable tools for the Commander In PEACE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
9. Build a bigger bomb, dig a deeper bunker, build a bigger bomb, dig a deeper bunker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
10. Anybody else find the idea of DOD issuing this press release TODAY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 06:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. It is a peace bringing bomb ya know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
11. Mother of All Bombs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberaltrucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
12. So, what's the point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 10:06 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Bomb makers need to make a living to ya know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 10:18 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. But it is a nuke. Capital N U K E. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
midnight armadillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 10:21 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Wrong on radiation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
13. Another very expensive solution in search of a problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreatCaesarsGhost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-09-09 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
18. You drop 15 tons and whatdaya get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 05:22 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC