Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush told of hijack warning weeks before 9/11 - April 9, 2004

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:01 AM
Original message
Bush told of hijack warning weeks before 9/11 - April 9, 2004
http://www.guardian.co.uk/september11/story/0,11209,1188902,00.html

Rice says briefing contained no fresh information

Julian Borger in Washington
Friday April 9, 2004
The Guardian

President Bush was given an intelligence briefing, entitled Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States just weeks before the September 11 attacks, it emerged yesterday.

Details of the August 6 briefing in 2001, which warned of terrorist preparations being made for hijackings on American soil, surfaced in testimony given by the US national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, to a commission of inquiry studying the September 11 attacks.

The existence of the Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) had been publicly known for some time, but Ms Rice's confirmation of its title and some of its contents pushed it centre stage in the explosive political row over whether the al-Qaida attacks could have been prevented.

The emotive significance of the briefing - in the form of a memorandum sent to the president summarising potential threats to the US - is all the greater because at the time he received it, Mr Bush was on a month-long "working holiday" at his Texas ranch and spent much of the following days fishing and clearing undergrowth on his land. He did not cut short his vacation or apparently take dramatic steps in response to the briefing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks, it never hurts to be reminded of the depraved indifference
manifest by the crazies let out of the basement in the days before "everything changed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Grounds for impeachment.
He failed to take action to protect the United States against a known threat. The result? 9/11.

IMPEACH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. It was all Clinton's fault...Remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Even if proven beyond any doubt, faithful ideologues would reason it was in the country's overall
best interest, as is every policy, action, war, et al ad infinitum, ad nauseam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bush - Incompetent President or Most Incompetent President ever?
I wonder how much of his ignorance is feigned to keep us ignorant of the greater motives?

When you look at who benefited the most from 9/11, it wasn't the American citizens, it wasn't bin Laden and it certainly wasn't al Queda: It was this administration and defense contractors.

We will have to face the fact that we have a government being run by criminals as a criminal enterprise. With that thought firmly in grasp, it's easy to see how they could allow or even orchestrate the deaths of Americans (a la Operation Northwoods) for political means.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Wow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarryNite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. I agree
He didn't do anything about the warning because he already knew and of course had no intentions of stopping the "New Pearl Harbor."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. I just noticed something interesting
notice the roof bows inward as the tower begins to collapse. The structures on top of the tower disappear first like the inner columns were cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Precisely
Many others have pointed to the "kink" in the penthouse just prior to collapse as excellent evidence of controlled demolition.

http://www.wtc7.net/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Notice how fast the penthouse disappears
Edited on Tue Apr-24-07 09:52 AM by formercia
in free fall from the first second, without hesitation. A controlled demolition is what happened.

I've had advanced demo training and participated in felling rigid steel structures with high explosives. It's not an easy thing to do and requires much study and precise charge placement. This was done by pros.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Lest we forget... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Their attitude had not changed since their briefings from the Clinton administration
They were warned of the dangers but made a conscious decision to just sit there saying, "Yea, yea, yea. Whatever. Talk to the hand."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. WWCD? What would Clinton Do?
Edited on Mon Apr-23-07 10:24 AM by The Backlash Cometh
Now that we know that this report definitely gave the White House warning, and now that Clinton and Madelaine Albright don't have to play nice and protect the Bush Administration out of any courtesy or tradition, can someone tell me what would Bill Clinton or even Al Gore have done if the same report landed on their desk during their Administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. Someone should take this to Rudy, who thinks W was tending to a "giant stack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bush 'turning a blind eye'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. If this was such a minor thing...why did they fight tooth and nail to keep us from
learning about this briefing? Because it contradicts the lies they told immediately after the attack. They had very clear warnings and they chose to ignore. Why? Because they wanted a reason to get our troops into the ME, particularly Iraq? Why? Because Iraq had the #2 oil reserves in the world...and this administration represents the interests of Big Oil.

We know what Cheney was doing in his Secret Energy Meetings in the Spring of 2001...he was divvying up Iraq's oil fields. Knowing that, how can we accept that this administration never anticipated that we'd be attacked? They needed a "New Pearl Harbor". I would suggest they were well aware that something was going to occur and they made sure that that they did nothing to keep it from happening. LIHOP, if you will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. So. Bush was told the levies would break 24 hours before they did
Since he told no one and did nothing, he can claim it is all someone else's fault.

Standard procedure for BushCo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
12. Thank you for this reminder. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
13. IMO, this PDB was precisely the REASON he spent a month on vacation.
Edited on Mon Apr-23-07 11:16 AM by Stephanie

They left DC because they wanted to get out of harm's way. If you recall, the month-long vacation was virtually unprecedented and it was politically unpopular. He took a lot of heat for it. It was hastily put together. The press corps was unaware that it was happening until they were practically on the road. Karen Hughes had to come up with that phony "Western White House" sign to try to spin the whole thing. The bottom line is, they got the briefing and high-tailed it out of DC to protect their own cowardly asses. Cheney also split town, and spent the month in Wyoming. "Fishing."

As soon as Bush was shamed into returning to DC a few days earlier than planned, he immediately took off for Camp David. Right after that, Florida. Where he had anti-aircraft missiles stationed on the roof of his hotel.

Bush Knew, Bush Flew. He's nothing but a coward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. LIHOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. you betcha
this is the deepest darkest secret of the Bush admin - who will finally tell the truth about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #13
33. On 9/10 there was a report that Atta was within 1/2 mile
Edited on Tue Apr-24-07 11:41 AM by formercia
of where Junior was staying. Was he stalking Junior, or just coordinating the next day's attack?

Which brings up the subject of Junior's Autobiography. I have a suggestion for a title: We were Cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. On edit
the title of my previous comment might be misleading. It should have read: There was a report that on 9/10.....

Others have surely covered this before...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
14. kcik
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
15. Condi lied to the faces of the 9/11 widows
when she said the 8-6 PDB did not warn of new attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. The look on his face in the classroom...
I don't know about the rest of you but to me that look on his face wasn't a look of concern but a look of "Holy shit! They're really going through with this!" He knew it was coming.

And that's what I'm saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. They?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. YEAH!!! THEY!!!!!
:nuke:

Let's hear your opinion oh wise one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
irislake Donating Member (967 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Yup
I agree. He sat there scared shitless waiting for the whole attack to go forward. Dick Cheney was running the show. Rummy and Meyers also did absolutely NOTHING but wait for all four planes to hit their targets. Had the fourth plane hit the Capitol Building, as planned, they could have declared martial law and the coup would have been complete --- rather than half-assed. I expect a dirty bomb will explode in the Capitol Building to finish the job before the 2008 election. Crazy? I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
23. Most Americans are sick of republicon lies about 9/11 and their gross failures
What did the republicons expect, with Commander AWOL and "Five Deferments" Cheney in charge of defending America?

Shame, incompetence, and dishonesty. Massive failures. Massive tragedy.

The republicons are too corrupt and incompetent to defend America and 9/11 is just one proof of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. Upon knowing he mistook it as historical, did anyone make changes for his future briefs?
Just heard he mistook it for an historical lesson. So, did the writers ever try to find out how they could write to the president such that they would be properly understood the next time they tried to warn him that our nation was under impending attack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
26. and he treated the hurricane that hit NOLA just the same

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
28. and yet Kerry could not mop the floor with him
that is not a slam against Kerry - it is a commentary on how much our supposed democratic process has been perverted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
32. I know for a fact that people were moved out of the Pentagon
before 9/11.

Can't say who but someone very high in DIA was moved to his house and given around the clock protection.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC