|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 04:15 PM Original message |
States crack down on meth ingredients-bills require prescriptions for medicines with pseudoephedrine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. Wouldn't it be safer all around if we just allowed meth heads to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 04:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Probably. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 04:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Or to get a less destructive amphetamine legally, much the same way I do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timeforpeace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
2. Alternatively, meth labs WILL find it more difficult to obtain a common meth precursor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 04:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. Curious: What percent of major meth manufacturers start with marked up pills they snag at Walgreens? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timeforpeace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 06:43 PM Response to Reply #16 |
29. All of them? What else would they use? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 06:49 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Raws obtained from Chinese labs or chem research suppliers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timeforpeace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 06:50 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Was there a question mark after all of them? If so what does that tell you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 06:59 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. I just find it interesting how these laws are being passed that clearly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timeforpeace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 07:01 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. I would think that restricting to Rx what previously was OTC would greatly decreases sales. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 07:05 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Yes, and alternatively, it could boost sales of other pharma products |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-02-10 12:47 PM Response to Reply #36 |
49. It would decrease VOLUME, but we've seen steep price increases to compensate. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timeforpeace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 06:52 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Raw whats obtained from Chinese labs? Are you making this stuff up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 07:01 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
3. Thats stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 04:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Just another step in Obama's socialist plans to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michreject (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 04:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Not entirely true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 04:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. Apparently they found a way to get around the quantity limit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 05:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. What's to stop them from using similar methods to get around a Rx requirement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 05:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. The only solution to stop it is to outlaw it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. fucking morons n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
5. I never got the sheer terror people seem to have about meth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 04:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Meh. Boogeyman du jour. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 04:43 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Well, yes, but people seem to be wetting their pants more about it than other boogiemen. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 05:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Every few years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 05:15 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. So it's okay that the rest of us shouldn't be allowed to get allergy medication? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timeforpeace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 06:46 PM Response to Reply #22 |
30. It's just a decongestant. There are other decongestants. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 07:04 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. None that work, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 07:12 PM Response to Reply #30 |
42. Right, and they're all equally effective with everyone's identical conditions. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 07:17 PM Response to Reply #30 |
44. None of the rest work on me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-02-10 12:46 PM Response to Reply #30 |
48. Most are both less effective and much more costly. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 05:17 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Those are problems by law enforcement in the first place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 05:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
26. The crack and cocaine dealers have GUNS. Cops would rather bust homeless people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
9. SUCK! I don't want to pay for a clinic visit every time I have a head cold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surrealAmerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
12. Not only is this a waste of money for people who have ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
15. Great idea. Now it only costs $100 dollars to visit a doctor to get prescribed former OTC medicine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 05:06 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Percentage derived from pseudoephedrine pills? I don't know, do you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 05:10 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Not at all. Someone must know know to make such laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OhioChick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
17. This is insane... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
25. Basic cold pills have almost DOUBLED in price since moving behind the counter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
27. Holy crap that's dumb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flaneur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
28. I call such laws the Mexican Methamphetamine Market Share Enhancement Act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 07:06 PM Response to Reply #28 |
41. Don't forget Canada |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shell Beau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
37. Yep, I am so looking forward to having to get a 'script for Sudafed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kievan Rus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
40. This is stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
43. Great, so next time I have a runny nose I'll just have to go pick up some meth. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enuegii (624 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
45. I guess it's back to jacking salt blocks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Withywindle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-01-10 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
46. This is INFURIATING. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Berry Cool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-02-10 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
47. Oh, great! That's all we need! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fleshdancer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-02-10 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
50. because prescription drugs are NEVER abused or obtained in large amounts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
winyanstaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-02-10 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
51. I am not a doctor so this is NOT medical advice... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC