|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Swede (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 10:57 AM Original message |
Justice Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
1. ....And watching right-winger heads explode - Priceless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
2. I think the only thing preventing this is her age. But it would set a nice precedent to get MObama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:16 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I agree she isn't young enough for our plan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Change Happens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
3. Yes!!! I would love to see this: THE MOTHER OF ALL BATTLES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:19 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. And she would get in despite it all. What a great 'fuck you' it would be. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
4. Sorry but I don't want to see another corporatist on the SCOTUS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
6. Maybe in the second term.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
8. How about an actual liberal with actual judicial experience? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:20 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Judicial experience is grossly over-rated. I don't think W.O. Douglas had any...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:30 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Okay, how about just an actual liberal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:37 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Well, that would be nice. I agree with that. But one would not be confirmed. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blue_onyx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:45 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. But Obama isn't particularly liberal either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:49 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I said during the primaries you couldn't throw a cat between their views... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:59 AM Response to Reply #20 |
26. I probably wouldn't support him for the high court either. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
9. I don't think she could be confirmed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:21 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Yes, she would. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:24 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Think again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
14. She is too old. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:37 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. I agree. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
15. READ ABOUT THE AUTHORS OF THIS PIECE (both highly partisan Republicans!): |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:38 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. This was discussed a LOT by Dems during '08. It's not an R idea. It's old news. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:42 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Why would 2 highly partisan Republican push Hillary Clinton for the SCOTUS? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:48 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Well, the man who might nominate her is a DLC Corporatist...so it's not unrealistic. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 12:01 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. As you know, Obama asked the DLC to remove his name: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Yes, he is and yes, she is. She's pro biz. That's why Republicans nominated her. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:53 AM Response to Reply #19 |
25. Slow news season. Want to get on op-ed pages. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
23. President would be a more appropriate job for her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-10-10 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
24. No matter what people say she is a good SOS BUT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC