Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Over an Alito Dissent, Supreme Court Denies Review in School Band Case (9th Circuit ruling stands)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:49 PM
Original message
Over an Alito Dissent, Supreme Court Denies Review in School Band Case (9th Circuit ruling stands)
Edited on Mon Mar-22-10 08:50 PM by usregimechange
When a controversial decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit is appealed to the Supreme Court, the justices often take the bait and reverse. But this morning, the Supreme Court denied review of a 9th Circuit ruling that nixed the performance of a religious instrumental piece by a public high school band in Washington state. Justice Samuel Alito Jr. dissented from the Court's denial of review.

A high school band in Everett, Washington chose to perform "Ave Maria" at graduation ceremonies, but school officials vetoed the plan, explaining that the piece's title alone had religious connotations, even though, as an instrumental piece, it contained no religious words. The officials noted that the year before, graduation attendees had complained about a school choir piece that referred to God and angels. Kathryn Nurre, a senior, challenged the officials' action as a violation of her freedom of speech. Both the district court for the western district of Washington and the 9th Circuit upheld the officials' actions...

Footnote: Curiously, the text of Alito's dissent available at the end of this document persistently misspells the word "superintendent" as "superintendant," though it is correctly spelled in the caption of the case, which refers to superintendent Carol Whitehead.

http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2010/03/over-an-alito-dissent-supreme-court-denies-review-in-school-band-case.html
http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/032210zor.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought failure...
...to play Elgar's "Pomp and Circumstance" #1 at a high school graduation was all by itself a violation of the Constitution..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. That misspelling may be an ultra-high-frequency dog whistle.
"See, I disregard that elitist libraul 'spelling' thing too! I'm one of you! A man of the people!"

Either that, or he's dumb. Judge or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Nonsense
I make typos all the time, despite having an excellent command of spelling and grammar. Besides, for all you know he dictated it or wrote it out in longhand and the spelling error was committed by a clerk. Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. And he is a supreme court judge who can't spell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fat Tony is a fascist, pure and simple.
In a different time and place he would have been a willing gas chamber attendant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. As an atheist...
I never had problems when the School Choir did religious music along the secular. Also didn't stop me from singing in the Choir for the Archbishop of Canterbury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC