Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

E-mailing the Morning Jerk circus: Pre-dawn ("What should we be talking about?")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 06:02 AM
Original message
E-mailing the Morning Jerk circus: Pre-dawn ("What should we be talking about?")
I figured out that the show only has its e-mailing form enabled during the show airing---meaning pre-dawn.

This morning I sent (the below), but ZOUNDS! The President is summitting with Russia, so there's that cog in my plans, but it's always fun to see SCARBOROUGH fuming when he knows some piercing criticism is out there.


***********WHAT I sent:

What should you be talking about?

1- KARZAI as druggie - another George BUSH stink-bomb going off, this one time-released. So how did Joe gig OBAMA yesterday about how he shouldn't have done the Afghan surge if KARZAI was all we had going, that "the generals have been elevated." Where was BUSH's intelligence-gathering for seven years, or rather, his intelligence-surpressing in order to get HIS personal agenda (Iraq) done? Who "elevated the generals"? I seem to remember it was that paragon of "personal responsibility" and "necessity": BUSH, who claimed his ROGUE policies were NOT his choices, they were the generals' and therefore necessary, at the same time that his media supporters propped him to the skies as "Commander in Chief" and "a WAR PRESIDENT." And I seem to remember OBAMA being gigged for "dithering" as he pondered Afghanistan, while CHEENEE and the media pounded him that he'd BETTER LISTEN to General MacCHRYSTAL. Where was our crack, investigative media then and now, just yakking and yakking with "advice". Why are "gossip" sources better jounalism: Gawker saying KARZAI is also said, as far back as 2005, to be a pederast,

http://gawker.com/5510815/president-of-afghanistan-on-d...
(Previously, in 2005, David Byrne said Karzai was a pederast!)

http://journal.davidbyrne.com/2005/04/41605.html


2- The show's personnel practices: Joe keeps misogynically verbally/emotionally abusing Mika with "jokes" about "chemical dependence". And who made BARNICLE and John RIDLEY any kind of experts in public policy---uh, BESIDES the rest of the usual choice crew of Joe, BUCHANAN, and most of the rest? Why not add Bristol PALIN into it, since she is being gushed over as spokesgirl against teen pregancy: She has as much claim to FLAWED personal decisions as the rest of the Morning Joe cast in their careers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's spot on
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. "the U.S.-installed president of Afghanistan is a well known pederast"
Per David Byrne :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Somebody gigged this bit yesterday on the grounds that pederasty-is-common
or part of Afghan culture. I don't know whether the poster was WTF-ing at supposed ignorance of the culture or at my posting it. I'm aware of some basic anthropological concepts, such as cultural relativity, but drug use can also be argued to have a cultural component, so why talk of one and not the other. Plus, our government officials frequently travel to other countries to lecture other countries about human rights for their different resident groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. I am patiently waiting for the day when either Mika's husband or Joe's wife
quietly files for divorce. I hope the whole story comes out because it is obvious that Joe and Mika are sleeping together. I don't see how they could just be travelling together with their spouses back home like they have done numerous times over the past year or so, and not having something going on. You can also see it in their body language...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Joe Scum and Mika Mouse are not worth your time--I do pay attention to their sponsors
and boycot them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC