Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wow..teabaggers issuing guidlines...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
one_voice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 10:08 PM
Original message
Wow..teabaggers issuing guidlines...
Now they want to decide the rules for appointments to the Supreme Court...And the Republicans will rush to kiss their ass and do their bidding...


Tea Party Express Lays Out 'Guidelines' On Kagan Confirmation Process

The Tea Party Express, a division of Our Country Deserves Better PAC, has rolled out its "guidelines," or initial talking points, for the nomination of Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court.

Technically, the group has taken no position on Kagan herself, saying that the group is in a "fact-gathering mode." But their guideline principles lay out a set of rules about smaller government, and the message should be clear. For example: "Judges must understand that the Federal government has no power if the Constitution does not explicitly provide it."

The between-the-lines message: The new health care reform law should be declared unconstitutional.


Five Constitutional principles to use as guideline for nominating a Supreme Court Justice:

1. Judges must interpret the Constitution of the United States as written.

2. Judges must not use their positions to replace the text of the law and Constitution of the United States with their own personal feelings or experiences.

3. Judges must understand that the Federal government has no power if the Constitution does not explicitly provide it.

4. Judges must respect the delicate checks and balances and the separation of powers among the branches of government.

5. The Constitution is an American document, and declares that it shall be "the Supreme Law of the Land."With Commentary:

1. Judges must interpret the Constitution of the United States as written and not attempt to modify it, either by inventing new rights or by ignoring or diluting rights already there. The Constitution already provides an amendment process that gives that power to the people and their elected officials.

2. Judges must not use their positions to replace the text of the law and Constitution of the United States with their own personal feelings or agenda or "life experiences." Nor should they allow empathy, political favor, or political identification to affect their legal decisions. To do so is to engage in judicial activism.

3. Judges must understand that the Federal government has no power if the Constitution does not explicitly provide it. The Founders did this to maximize personal and economic liberty. The Constitution reserves all other rights to the states and to the people.

4. Judges must respect the delicate checks and balances and the separation of powers among the branches of government, refusing to become a tool of either the Legislative or Executive branches, and they must be prepared to uphold their oaths by refusing to follow any efforts of the other branches that oversteps their constitutionally delegated powers.

5. The Constitution is an American document, and declares that it shall be "the supreme Law of the Land." Foreign law has no place as precedent or authority in the interpretation of the Constitution.


http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/05/tea-party-express-lays-out-guidelines-on-kagan-confirmation-process.php?ref=fpa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why don't they send that memo to the right wingers on the court.
Those damn 'activist judges'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nope, sorry teabaggers.
You lost, you don't get a say. Now kindly FUCK THE FUCK OFF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Now that made me giggle :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, right
Where were these yahoos in December 2000? Oh yeah, stopping the counting of ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dalaigh lllama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. written by Constitutional scowlers and exspurts
fer shure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. Now what would we have to change to fill these criteria? ...
Edited on Tue May-11-10 10:56 PM by Kablooie
Here are a few things the government must stop because they are not explicitly in the Constitution.

Smithsonian
Library of Congress
NASA
Forest Service
Road Maintenance
Health and Safety
Medicare
Social Security
Historic Preservation and monuments
Environmental control
Regulation of Business
Regulation of Wall Street
Regulation of Drugs both legal and illegal
Air Force (Only land and naval forces are mentioned)
AMTRAK
Regulation of tobacco and alcohol and explosives
CIA
FBI
Department of Education
Department of Energy
Housing and Urban Development
Vetrans Affairs
Endowment for the ARts
National Gallery of Art

Oh, and there's nothing in the Constitution that allows the government to make gay marriage illegal.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Nailed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. They can read my guidlines...for sucking my ass !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Woot! You speak for me!
:applause: :toast: :pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Tea Gagger: "I believe in strict conservatism" so I believe blacks are 3/5ths of a human being...
As a "Tea Gagger", I also believe women and blacks should not be allowed to vote or own land. And every right guaranteed through the amendments need to be removed. They are changes to the Constitution, therefore they will not be permitted by Tea Gaggers...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. BTW: When people get together and issue guidelines that is a form of government.
Guidelines are 'regulations' so not only are the Tea Gaggers admitting they support forming government, but also support regulations. My my, what an admission of blatant hypocrisy!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC