Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Waxman says congressional investigation shows Gulf oil well's blowout preventer had leak

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 11:13 AM
Original message
Rep. Waxman says congressional investigation shows Gulf oil well's blowout preventer had leak
Are we looking now at a prosecutable crime?

Rep. Henry Waxman says that his committee's investigation into the Gulf oil spill reveals that a key safety device, the blowout preventer, had a leak in a crucial hydraulic system.

The California Democrat said in a hearing Wednesday that the investigation also discovered that the well had failed a negative pressure test just hours before the April 20 explosion.

He cited BP documents received by the Energy and Commerce Committee that showed there was a breach in the well integrity that allowed methane gas and possibly other hydrocarbons to enter the well.

http://start.localnet.com/article.php?article=D9FLCJLG0.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like criminal negligence to me. n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Negligence, yes, but criminal, please explain.
Are you claiming they did not test this part before installing it? Do you think they should have had a back-up for the faulty part? Please explain, what made this negligence criminal in your opinion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The same thing with the recent mine disaster in WV and Massey Coal, who is now under a
criminal investigation - i.e. the company KNOWS there is a potentially catostrophic problem and doesn't fix it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I would say that the criminal part comes from the fact they knew it wasn't right
but went ahead and done it anyway. my 2 cents worth. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC