Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can a child pornographer last longer at Free Republic than a Giuliani supporter?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 12:24 PM
Original message
Can a child pornographer last longer at Free Republic than a Giuliani supporter?


Ultra-conservative news site and web forum Free Republic has been a barely-moderated cesspool of the nuttiest right-wingers on the internet since 1996. Freepers basically have carte blanche to say whatever they like—as long as they love guns and hate gays. Really, the only way to get banned from FreeRepublic is to announce your support for Rudy Giuliani. One thing that apparently won't result in a ban: using the site solely to boost web ranking for your child porn site.



Here's the profile page for Free Republic user "Preteen Lolita." Preteen's been a Freeper since December 28, 2009—4-and-a-half months of using FreeRepublic.com's page rank to advertise underage pornography without anyone noticing.



The link (don't click on it) is obscured via a free Swiss URL shortening service. I can't personally confirm, but I'm told the link redirects to a site that features what appears to be real-life child porn. When you search Google for referrals to the site the link redirects to, Google informs you that a link has been deleted due to a child pornography complaint. (Referrals to the redirect link all advertise underage pornography.)

Now FreeRepublic.com is not hosting or even "condoning" child pornography. It's just that it's so ridiculously easy to set up a profile and get your own FreeRepublic page that apparently anyone can and will do it. Theoretically, someone could do this at Kos or OpenSalon. (But, as far as we know, no one has.)

Really, it's just funny that a site that was created for the purpose of hounding Bill Clinton for his moral failings, a site that represents the fire-breathing anti-gay, anti-abortion morality police, a site so doctrinaire in its vision of conservativism that hundreds of users have been banned for supporting Giuliani and even Mitt Romney, is also considered by filthy smut merchant to be the perfect place to peddle his wares.

<snip>

http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/pornography/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2010/05/12/freep_porn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalLoner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Doesn't surprise me. Child porn is big business. Cons are pro-business. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. do you have proof of that? because if so, i think you should go to the feds, it's a federal crime.
if not, i politely request you don't accuse people of it irresponsibly. even right wingers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brendan120678 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I second your claim of irresponsibility.
As much as we may detest the members of FR and FR's ownership, it isn't right to throw baseless accusations around like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Come on now,
throwing that shit around isn't even vaguely funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. LOL! Well, they are known to have 'secret forums' for some members.
God knows what they post there. I always assumed it was bomb plans and illegal gun trading.

Maybe kiddie porn, too.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. killers and a child pornographer..
and their spokesman receives national exposure. old jimmy gets another visit from the feds..

the guys who run stormfront are geniuses compared to jimmy at freerepublic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. "A Barely-Moderated Cesspool of the Nuttiest Right-Wingers on the Internet Since 1996."
Isn't that Free Republic's official slogan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Damn you liberals and your interfering regulation!
Perhaps that applies to child pornography too? ;)

While I'm kidding, I've actually had right wingers argue there shouldn't be a minimum age limit for sex because it's none of the government's business. When called on it they rapidly retreated into "I'm only kidding! I'm not a degenerate like you." arguments. I would imagine the ones willing to make or back such arguments are a pretty small percentage of the total.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kick. Ick, but kick.
Ew. I guess we should publicize this fact, but I feel creepy even clicking on this thread. Probably why you don't have more recommends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wonder why RimJob hasn't had it scrubbed.
He itemizes for all his website 'work' during his fundraisers. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Child pornographer OR Giuliani supporter? Bet there's lots of overlap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. Has someone reported this or how do you report this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. I got banned from FR within a few seconds of posting an OP
recommending that people vote Democratic in the 2006 elections.

It was a pretty good essay. I don't understand what they didn't like about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. They were jealous of your excellent writing skills ...
the heck with 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. He was suspect the minute he used proper grammar.
Edited on Thu May-13-10 11:47 AM by formercia
If you're going to frequent FR, you have to unlearn everything you were taught in English class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. Can a child pornographer last longer at Free Republic than a Giuliani supporter?
Source: Salon

Ultra-conservative news site and Web forum Free Republic has been a barely moderated cesspool of the nuttiest right-wingers on the Internet since 1996. Freepers basically have carte blanche to say whatever they like -- as long as they love guns and hate gays. Really, the only way to get banned from FreeRepublic is to announce your support for Rudy Giuliani. One thing that apparently won't result in a ban: using the site solely to boost Web ranking for your child porn site.

...

Read more: http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/05/12/freep_porn



JimRob has some 'splainin to do...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Jesusfuckingchrist, these people should just be shot and be done............
...........with these shitbags. Shot with their OWN guns of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brendan120678 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. "Latest Breaking News"?
Edited on Thu May-13-10 09:32 AM by brendan120678
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Hey, why not? Sure as hell beats Justin Bieber "headlines."
'Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
19. So, rather than reporting this to both the FBI and RimJob, Salon chose to...write a snarky article?!
This looks like a fairly simple case of spam-bot posting, which can be done on forums like Freepland that aren't kept up to date with the latest anti-spam software/code.

But still, when you're dealing with suspected child porn, report it to the FBI, just to be on the safe side. Then go tell RimJob about it. He's old, slow, and dumb. He probably missed it. I wouldn't wish an "aiding and abetting child porn" charge on anyone who's not actually guilty of it, no matter how much I hate them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC