Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is 'openly gay' not a redundancy?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:30 PM
Original message
Is 'openly gay' not a redundancy?
I've seen it used about 100 times today alone. Maybe it's always used that way, but I didn't notice it until today. But doesn't gay mean, "openly homosexual?" So doesn't "openly gay" mean "openly openly homosexual?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought "gay" just means homosexual n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Apparently that's what it's coming to mean.
But originally, it meant (correct me if I'm wrong) "out of the closet." It was considered a political act to call yourself gay. It meant you weren't hiding anymore. You were proud and out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. "closet gay" is also used a lot...
I worked for a gay couple for many years... one called himself "the happy homosexual" and didn't care who heard him. The other was afraid it would be bad for business if people knew, so he was very much closeted and called himself a "closeted gay" on occasion, meaning he felt forced into the closet.

I tend to use the words people use for themselves... safer I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. That's why I'm asking the question, to clarify it.
It struck me as odd when I read it first thing this morning. Then I saw it in an entirely different context later in the day. I'm just trying to get a handle on a word that has changed meaning in my lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. They're just trying to be devisive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoNothing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Only bigots use the word "homosexual"
Or so I've been told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I haven't heard that.
It's a cumbersome word, much moreso than "gay" for sure. And clinical. But bigoted? I don't know about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. Invariably, BurtWorm. And usually pronounced homoSECCCCCTchewal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. From that chewing homo sect?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Someone mean told you something mean...
I think.

I've never heard such a thing... and further, I've heard many gay men use the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoNothing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yeah, well, I've heard lots of black people use the "n-word"
Doesn't mean it's not offensive when I use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Now you're just spit-balling it.
It's okay to say "Oh, then I was mistaken." Most people construe such a statement as a sign of self confidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. I'm quite sure I would stand corrected when I use it...
Or would be warned not to use it in "polite" company.

I live in Long Beach, CA, where being gay is like being tanned... you are either one or the other or both in this town. We have an amazing annual gay pride parade and festival too.

I'm really quite sure I would be "corrected" on this if it were a problem, or if they thought any of their friends or acquaintances thought it would be a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Third in line to tell you "not true."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katzenjammers Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Well, the word is technically an adjective, NOT a noun although it's commonly (mis)used
that way. I'm gay and I don't find it to be pejorative although I rarely use it myself except in more or less clinical discussions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. It has a facetious little kick to it, in my experience.
It's such a ridiculously clinical word.

Welcome to DU, by the way. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. Really? Does the same theory apply to homo sapiens as opposed to human?
"Homosexual" is merely an accurate, clinical term. Now if you'd said only bigots use the word "homosexual" followed immediately by the word "agenda", I'd agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Gay and homosexual are synonyms. No real distinction. (Gay is preferred)
Edited on Wed May-12-10 04:38 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
The word homosexual is kind of like 'negro' was in 1970 in relation to 'black.' Still in use but approaching being offensive.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. What I *really* don't understand is the use of "gay and lesbian"
Now to me, that sounds redundant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I wonder if that's regional or something...
Because the gay men I know use it all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. I don't know many instances of people using the clinical term for the demographic, that's for sure.
I thought (apparently wrongly) that there's the gay population that can be determined because gay people are open to being counted as gay. Then there's the population of "non-gays" if you will which includes an indeterminate amount who might one day become gay--ie., "openly gay"--but who aren't willing to be so counted right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Kinda sorta. Problem is that there's no finite definitions here. People exist on a continuum
There's gradations of gayness, or of gay self-identification. Unless it becomes a census item in 2020, there's just no way to concretely say x number of people fit into category A, y number in category B, & so forth. Some people are willing to be counted as gay for a pride parade, but not for work; they'll be counted for a petition, but not for a family reunion; for a church denomination, but not for a local political convention.

Where we stand now, it's really not quantifiable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Am So Me Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. reply
No, just being gay doesn't mean you're openly gay. There are plenty of people who are gay that keep it secret for fear of retaliation. For example, some people who speak out against homosexuality are actually homosexuals themselves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. Gay doesn't imply being "out" or "open."
Someone can be gay and be in the closet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. I could swear the meaning has changed since the 1970s.
Unless I didn't understand what it meant back then. But I think gay used to mean something like what "out" means now, but there was a kick of pride in it, like relief that you didn't have to hide your identity anymore. It was like a hand being held out to others in the closet to come out and join the movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Exactly right. It's a flexible, indeterminative word that rapidly evolves in meaning & connotation.
I don't think you can even get 5 linguists to precisely and exhaustively agree to what the word means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's an emphasizer, like with "Kith & kin" or "Hearth & home"
There are people who are gay on the DL. They self identify as gay, but they keep it a secret at work. That's different than true closet cases where they deny they're gay, maybe even to themselves, but then act out their sexual compulsions with people of the same sex, like Larry Craig. Larry Craig is a straight man who just likes to get his groove on with other men. But he's living the straight lifestyle. That's quite different than my friend H., who is gay socially, but keeps that entirely secret from the people at the hospital he works at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
21. No, it's not. A trip to m-w.com could've answered this as easily as a thread. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. It wouldn't have been as fun though.
Edited on Wed May-12-10 05:08 PM by BurtWorm
:P

PS: Dictionaries tend to miss the way some words are actually used. That's for *your* reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
24. I'm gaily open
Does that count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
29. no. some gay people are "in the clostet"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC