Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From DAY ONE, the ONLY thing BP should have been left in charge of is plugging the damn hole.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:15 AM
Original message
From DAY ONE, the ONLY thing BP should have been left in charge of is plugging the damn hole.
It is not BP's waters, not their beaches, not their marshlands.

Like what should have happened during Katrina, the National Guard should have been mobilized immediately.

The Government (whether it be the EPA, the Navy or the Coast Guard) should have jumped out ahead of this thing, put the BP execs in a room, and obtained a TRUE ASSESSMENT of whether this gusher was going to be able to be contained quickly...WITHOUT BEING FUCKING BULLSHITTED.

A high level representative from the administration (like BIDEN, for example) should have been put in charge, and that person would direct and/or approve every move made by the Coast guard, Navy, etc.

Not a drop of dispersant should have touched those waters until the gusher was ended so the true magnitude of this thing could be determined.

A jobs program should have been created where the Government housed and employed civilian workers.

The above steps are what is known as "jumping out ahead of a problem".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yep. That's the way I see it !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corpseratemedia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Not a drop of dispersant should have touched those waters until the gusher was ended "
With out a solution to ending the gusher, the government should have ordered BP to not use dispersants?

Yeah, that would have gone over big. Ridiculous.

The government's response has been swift and effective despite the armchair quarterbacking.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm not even clicking on a blue link called "effective".
Edited on Wed May-26-10 08:43 AM by LeftyFingerPop
Nothing has been effective.

And yes, the addition of several hundred thousand gallons of a most probably toxic chemical does three things:

1) Masks the true extent of the problem.

2) Drops a lot of the oil to the sea floor where it is essentially hidden.

3) Adds yet another chemical to the toxic mess already caused by the oil.

And you are armchair quarterbacking by suggesting that the response has been "effective".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. "Nothing has been effective."
Drivel.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Yes
Gulf Oil Spill Jobs: Cleanup Efforts Create Mini Job Boom

NEW ORLEANS — Much as he hates to say it, Mark Leonard knows it's true: The oil spill that is fouling the Gulf of Mexico may save his family's business.

Leonard, 34, is operations manager for Coastal Tank Cleaning, a company called in to help set booms to prevent oil from the Deepwater Horizon leak from getting into Lake Pontchartrain. The Morgan City-based company sent 10 workers and equipment to a staging area at Fort Pike, on the eastern tip of New Orleans.

<...>

BP has spent more than $750 million so far in oil spill response initiatives. Spokesman John Curry said the company has hired more than 20,000 people as part of the response to the April 20 accident and its aftermath. Some are contractors and subcontractors, some are laborers hired to set boom.

<...>

Unskilled labor is getting a boost, too.

In Pensacola, Fla., 4,000 people in Escambia and Santa Rosa counties showed up at recruiting events to apply for 500 potential clean-up jobs.

<...>


People are showing up to apply for jobs so evidently they're aware of these efforts.

Unified Area Command Continues to Build Web and New Media Engagement

The Unified Area Command in Robert, La., continues to grow its public engagement via its website (www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com), which has received more than 19 million hits since it was launched on April 23, as well as Facebook (18,277 users) and Twitter (3,707 followers). These resources contain information about response efforts, jobs, volunteer opportunities, impacts to wildlife and other important public information.

link



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Oh.
That must be why my own lying eyes are seeing oil in the marshlands, dead dolphins, oily dead birds, and dead turtles.

That must be why I am hearing about grown men breaking down in tears.

That is why I am hearing bubbling anger from fishermen just about ready to take up arms.

Please don't post this myopic stuff and tell me things are going just swimmingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. "A jobs program should have been created "
facts

"Please don't post this myopic stuff and tell me things are going just swimmingly"

Who said things are going "swimmingly"?

You stated what should be done, and there is nothing wrong with pointing out the efforts that are underway.

If you cannot deal with the facts, that's not my problem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. FACTS
Oil in the marshlands and on beaches.

Dead birds.

Crying fishermen.

Loss of income for several hundred thousand people.

Lies from BP as to the magnitude.

Those are facts.

"Effective" implies "swimmingly". That's a fact too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Yes, there is a catastrophe in the Gulf
From the OP:

"Not a drop of dispersant should have touched those waters until the gusher was ended so the true magnitude of this thing could be determined.

A jobs program should have been created where the Government housed and employed civilian workers. "

The solution to "Dead birds"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. What, are you an Obama hater?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Sarcasm duly noted!
I voted for him, I like him, I'm happy he won... but he fucked up here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think so too, but I was castigated last night for those same impure thoughts.
Edited on Wed May-26-10 08:50 AM by DainBramaged
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
suzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Wrong place.
Edited on Wed May-26-10 09:01 AM by suzie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. I agree with you 100%
good post.. I just don't understand how some folks can just kick back watching the Gulf die and still advocate for keeping BP in charge..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. I agree with some of this, LeftyFingerPop...
But we can't compare Katrina to this for a number of reasons.

The National Guard, FEMA, and other disaster oriented Federal agencies are experienced and trained for hurricanes, etc., but are NOT prepared in any reasonable fashion to respond to this sort of thing.

That they are not is a fair criticism, we now know that they MUST be, given how many holes are down there, even if we ban future drilling.

I'm no expert on dispersants, but waiting until the leak was ended before using these could have been a real mistake. We just don't know.

I wholeheartedly agree that Obama, etal, should have come out more publicly and urgently about all this. That they haven't doesn't really tell us if they were or were not actually working their asses off. But it wouldn't have hurt, it is a missed opportunity. I don't understand it.

I think there are tens of thousands of volunteers and hundreds of civilian ships involved. BP is going to have to pay these people for their responses. I'm not sure that a jobs program would really be workable, because what do you tell them to do? Just walking out on an oil soaked marsh can be more damaging than leaving it alone. I don't know that the expertise exists to properly direct thousands of people to properly mitigate what's going on out there.

But it's a good idea, and a jobs program post-leak-stoppage will be a great idea with the right planning and staff in place to clean up and begin to restore the environment.

We should watch for this and urge action toward this goal.

The damage out there is going to outlive both of us, friend, and I like the idea of putting people to work out there.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Fair points...
I'm not trying to compare this to Katrina. I also think this is a different animal.

However, I am seeing people on the beaches now, shoveling up sand. The guard could be doing that on a much larger scale, and perhaps be working on projects to protect the marshlands. Additionally, the mobilization of the guard would do a lot to quell the anger of the people along the coast...just knowing that they are mobilized and ready.

Your points are well taken, especially the "jobs program post leak stoppage".

Like all of us, I'm just praying that the top kill works.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. That's The Only Thing They ARE Doing...
This is a three-fold catastrophe. First is fixing the gusher, next is organizing a clean-up (it makes little sense to devote massive amounts of money and resources while the oil still flows and whatever is cleaned up ends up an oil mess the next day) and then comes the blame and liabiility game that will play out in the courts for years to come.

Other than try to protect the coast lines, what else can the government do? Pull the whole country to a halt? Declare martial law? Become authoritarian all over BP's ass (despite the contempt many of us had when the booosh regime did that)? Lots of second guessing and finger pointing...and it's done nothing to stop the oil only made a bad situation worse.

Sorry, I don't go along with tokenism...what would sending Biden to sit on a dock in Lousiana bossing people around going to do? What is his expertise in this matter? Cutting red tape? What tape? Lots of spinning and misinformation has people all in a snit...all the while the oil continues to flow.

I expect there will be a jobs program forthcoming when the clean-up phase begins in earnest, but it can't while the oil still flows. Jumping ahead of a problem can put you in the way of a solution. This administraion is getting far more reliable information than the chattering class on the teevee or bloggers with agendas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. That is not the only thing BP is doing...
1) They are dumping a crapload of questionable dispersant on our waters.

2) They are trying their hardest to limit access to our beaches.

3) They are spreading misinformation as to the magnitude of this thing.

Sending a leader to oversee our response is not tokenism. You do not need to be a subject matter expert to lead toward a goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Lots Of Misinformation...
Yes, the have dumped Corex and have been instructed by the Government to stop. Yet they still are using it. So they are adding to the criminal charges. Let's see what happens when the President goes down to the region AGAIN tomorrow and what is said and done on this issue. There are still those who want this stuff dropped...someone on DU even suggested bringing in aircraft carriers to drop Corex (:crazy:)

Yes, BP is trying to do damage control and a miserable job of it. It's PR and stock price have taken a big hit and they're not stopping the pictures of the horror to show up on the teevee or the internet. THey're just one of many parties on all sides of the political spectrum spreading misinformation here that has mattered little as the oil continues to flow. And that's the major matter at this point...it's ending the flow, it's BP's mess.

We went through 8 years of token leadership...the "bullhorn" moment that sure felt good, but sure didn't catch "those guys who knocked thse buildings down". That sure turned out real well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Wow..nothing makes sense in this...congrats...totally without reason..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
20. I agree totally. And BP should be responsible for
every dime it costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. instead the CEO is giving interviews why doesn't he do his freaking job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dystopian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
26. KandR.
Great post.
Thank you.

peace~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
27. +a brazillion.
I've been saying this for 2 weeks.

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/dgibby
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I just read your journal, and we are on the same wave length.
Here is how I judge the matter:

1) Are a good percentage of people being impacted voicing a concern?

2) Is there in fact a substantial loss of wildlife?

3) Has the oil indeed made it into the wetlands?

If the answer to any of these questions is yes, then more can be done.

I really can't be bothered with people posting website links and telling me I am not looking at the facts. I know what my eyes see and my ears hear. My reason for posting concern is not a political one.

Your post was a good one. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Thank you.
I have family in NOLA. They have a baby on the way. I want them out of there, but that's not possible for a variety of reasons. I want everything that can be done to mitigate the damage done.

Did you see the CNN interview with the head of Homeland Security for Jefferson Parish this am? He was saying some of the same things I posted. He's the one who commandered the boats from BP last Saturday. I wish they'd put him in charge--someone with leadership skills who's not afraid to use them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. No, I did not see that but I wish that I had.
My best wishes to your family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC