Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Even if BP oil well cap is getting 90% of the oil it still means that 1,900 ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:25 AM
Original message
Even if BP oil well cap is getting 90% of the oil it still means that 1,900 ...
.... barrels a day will still be leaking into the gulf.

19,000 barrels per day leaking x .1 = 1,900



Still it is a start.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. They're not getting 90% nor would they EVER get 90% with the current configuration....
Edited on Fri Jun-04-10 09:28 AM by Junkdrawer
They can't "pump" because it's a gas/oil mixture. All they can do is provide an up path, through 1 mile of pipe, to the surface. And that has to compete with the seals on the cap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I was worried when they didn't get a clean cut on the pipe
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That is a lot of pressure at those depths.
It will take the easiest path.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. You can't pump oil gas mixtures?
Really?



Someone should let TX know they have been violating the laws of physics for last 50 years.

Pumping an oil gas mixture is more difficult but not impossible. The pumps on drilling ship are rather powerful. The larger concern is too much suction.

Too little suction and a lot of oil escapes
Right amount of suction maximum amount of oil captures and minimum seawater captured.
Too much suction and a lot of seawater enters the mix.

Too much seawater and it overcomes the heating/methanol system and you get ice formation in tube = bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Your picture is of a Reciprocating Pump:
Edited on Fri Jun-04-10 09:59 AM by Junkdrawer


A pump consisting of a piston (Plunger) that moves up and down in a cylinder (barrel). The pump is equipped with standing valve (suction) and travel valve (discharge). On the upstroke the standing valve opens and fluid is drawn into the pump. On the down stroke, the standing valve closes and the travel valve opens, and fluid is forced out of the pump.

At the bottom of the borehole is the "down-hole pump". This pump consists of two ball valves: a stationary valve attached the barrel called the "standing valve" and a travel valve connected to the bottom of the plunger. The plunger is connected to the bottom of the sucker rods that travels up and down as the pump Jack reciprocates, Reservoir fluid seeps from the formation into the bottom of the borehole through perforations that have been made through the casing and cement (casing is a larger metal pipe that runs the length of the well, which has cement placed between it and the earth.

The tubing, pump and sucker rods are all inside the casing). When the rods are traveling up, the traveling valve is closed and the standing valve is open (due to the drop in pressure in the pump barrel). Consequently, the pump barrel fills with the fluid from the formation as the traveling piston lifts the previous contents of the barrel upwards.

When the rods begin pushing down, the traveling valve opens and the standing valve closes (due to an increase in pressure in the pump barrel). The fluid in the barrel (which was sucked in during the upstroke) flows up through the traveling valve. The piston then reaches the end of its stroke and begins its path upwards again, repeating the process.

Often, gas is produced through the same perforations as the oil. This can be problematic if gas enters the pump, this can result in "gas locking", where insufficient pressure builds up in the pump barrel to open the valves (due to compression of the gas) and little or nothing is pumped. To avoid this, the inlet for the pump is placed below the perforations. When the gas enters the well bore through the perforations, it bubbles up the annulus (the space between the casing and the tubing) and does not have space to make it into the pump. Once at the surface, the gas is collected through a tube connected to the annulus.


http://www.quinnpumps.com/Recip_Pumps.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. You don't have to pump it.
The oil has a specific gravity of something less than 90% of water. If you simply fill the pipe with oil, cap the top and measure the pressure at water level, the pressure in the pipe will be something like 400 psi.

Unless they've chosen a significantly undersized pipe, the 500 gpm will flow blast right into the tanker. More likely, they'll have to throttle it to prevent too much seawater entry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. 500 gpm translates to 17,000 bpd. Let's see what they get, but....
independent experts were putting the leak at 50,000 to 95,000 bpd and that was before the riser was removed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Independent scientific panel (comissioned by US govt) puts the leak at 12K to 19K bpd. n/t
Edited on Fri Jun-04-10 10:38 AM by Statistical
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. For weeks the US govt kept the official number at 5000 bpd....
even after that number was OBVIOUSLY wrong. The US govt seems highly motivated to minimize the leak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Except the panel was made up of INDEPENDENT scientists and academics.
Many who are well known and respected.

People have a personal and professional reputation to maintain.
Not a single member of the panel was an employee of BP or the US govt.

So a large group of independent scientists with the most complete set of data using three different independent methods achieved an estimate of 12K to 19K bpd.

Just because a person with a blog says 90K or 200K or elventy quadrillion bpd doesn't make it true.

Had the panel come back with a number higher than 90K would you still be claiming they are wrong and the leak is no more than 90K? I doubt it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. The only reasons they couldn't collect all of it
a) methane ice plugs the workings
b) they've chosen a too-small pipe to connect to the surface
c) they throttle the flow to prevent entry of any seawater

My guess is that a) is the biggie. As I understand it, excess seawater entry will cause ice to form. Also, they have a finite supply of warm water and methanol to inject to prevent ice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Yup seawater is actually the bigger problem not pumping.
too much seawater and the system freezing.

Even if they could make a perfect seal they wouldn't want to because slightly overpressure (oil leaking out) is better because it means water isn't leaking in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. 90% ? Try 10%. They cut the riser and doubled the flow and now capture 10%
Unless there is another step where they shut the valves, that works, this looks to have worsened the outflow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Anythng to back up the claim they doubled the flow? And that maximum capture rate will be 10%? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. How much flow is there?
After 44 days you'd think they could tell us how much is flowing.

How much has been released and how much is now flowing?
Does anyone know? 10% of not knowing equals nothing, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. No I don't expect BP to tell us. But Obama had a comission give us an estimate on flow.
12K to 19K bpd.
There is no reason they can't do another study and come up with new flow now that riser has been removed.

However not having data isn't "proof" that flow has doubled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. 90% was the figure that BP was trying to reach.
I still think putting Dick Cheney into the pipe is a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. that is great idea, he sucks anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. MSM is just touting the success

How GREAT IT IS, says MSM, the cap is successful.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. According to AP radio news, They hope to capture as much as 42,000 gal. a day.
That would be 1,000 bbl a day, or about 8% of the total flow according to some estimates of the leak rate.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I think it is CURRENTLY capturing 1K bpd not that 1k is the hope or ultimate goal.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN0410922820100604?type=marketsNews

BP Plc.'s containment cap over its stricken Gulf of Mexico well is collecting about 1,000 barrels per day, the top U.S. official overseeing the cleanup effort said on Friday.

...

One thousand barrels is a small fraction of the 19,000 barrels per day that the U.S. government has estimated could be gushing from the well, but the amount should increase as BP closes vents at the bottom of the cap to trap more oil, Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen told reporters in a conference call.

------------------

Personally I doubt they will get 90%. Maybe they can get 75% though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. I hope you're right.
But 75% may be optimistic. The captured natural gas and volatiles in the crude make pumping at the top problematic. The seal at the bottom has to resist the weight of a fluid column a mile high. And friction/turbulence in the pipe, which adds up over a mile. All with little or no help at the surface from pumps. I'm having a lot of trouble taking this seriously.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. those pictures break my heart, they did not ask for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC