Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is it that FOX News is obligated to show the legs of female hosts?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Devil_Fish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:35 PM
Original message
Why is it that FOX News is obligated to show the legs of female hosts?
Take this video for example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKSuc9gCInA

At 0:50 they cut for a split second to a view of the host sitting on a stool behind a backless desk as if her nylon stockings some how make what she is saying more credible. FOX does this every time. It's as if they have a passon for bar stools and sofas. I have never sceen Rachel Madow's legs. Or that girl on TYT or the one on Grit TV etc.

Help me out here is FOX not the only network that does this? and if so should they have the right to call them selves a news organization? Maby they should be forced to change their name to T&A or perhaps Skinamax or somthing like that.

I'm truly curions, does any one have a clip of FOX news with a Female host where they don't show her legs atleast once?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. female GOP pundits have to have sex appeal. It is the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. In laymens terms Fox is just opening their pimp window...
to show what they have to sell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. They market their bullshit to middle aged men. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. bingo
Edited on Sat Jul-24-10 08:44 PM by Maru Kitteh
eta: You left out the "white."

As in: They market their bullshit to middle aged white men. nt.


The token minority women who host are not frequently required to show their legs. In' FOX's world, nobody wants them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. and if white female on Faux, they need to dye their hair blond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. The girl on TYT...
Rowrr!

You know why they do it. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is this photoshopped?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devil_Fish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I wouldn't put it past them. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miscsoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Male hosts don't even have to wear matching trousers
Edited on Sat Jul-24-10 08:49 PM by miscsoc
Seriously, Glenn Beck wears jeans because he's only ever filmed from the waist up.

See that clip of where one of his guests fainted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miscsoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's totally conscious and intentional, Murdoch knows sex sells
Edited on Sat Jul-24-10 08:53 PM by miscsoc
The Sun, the newspaper, is more or less the UK equiv of Fox News i.e. right wing propaganda, and as soon as Murdoch bought it, he introduced topless teenagers on page 3.

The answer is: Rupert Murdoch knows how to appeal to the wingnut on the street - mix up your conservative talking points with soft porn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Because they don't have anything else to offer other
than eye candy. I wrote them once and asked them why their news' women were dressed and made up like streetwalkers and why were they seated in short skirts and the camera set at such and angle if they moved their leg, one could look up their skirt and see France? Was it possibly because what was being presented as news was tabloid sensationalism? They never answered my letter not even with a generic form letter.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Boomerang Donating Member (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. Nothing like gratuitous sex to program their viewing audience.
There is too much that goes on TV news anymore for me to watch it. From the ticker tapes to the scrolling text to the pre-planned interviews, and commercial plugs.

I refuse to watch "programming," anymore.

...Subsequently, I miss all the leg and cleavage shots FOX has to offer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. please .... Rupert has been doing this for 40 years .... page 3 girls ... wiki link
Edited on Sat Jul-24-10 09:12 PM by Botany
History of Page Three

When he relaunched the flagging Sun newspaper in tabloid format on November 17, 1969, Rupert Murdoch began publishing photographs of clothed glamour models
on its third page. The first edition featured that month's Penthouse Pet, Ulla Lindstrom, wearing a suggestively unbuttoned shirt. Page Three photographs over the following
year were often provocative, but did not feature nudity.

On November 17, 1970, editor Larry Lamb celebrated the tabloid's first anniversary by publishing a photograph of 20-year-old German model Stephanie Rahn in her
"birthday suit."<1> Profiled from the side, sitting nude in a field with one of her breasts visible, Rahn was photographed by Beverley Goodway, who worked as The Sun's
main Page Three photographer until his retirement in 2003.<2><3>

Gradually, The Sun began to feature Page Three girls in more overtly topless poses, with their nipples clearly visible. Although these photographs caused controversy at
the time, they are credited with the increase in circulation that established The Sun as one of the most popular newspapers in the United Kingdom by the mid-1970s.<4>
In an effort to compete with The Sun, the Daily Mirror and Daily Star tabloids instituted their own Page Three–like features under different names.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_Three

This is nothing new!

google page 3 girls images

http://www.page3.com/ link to Rupert's Sun newspaper page 3 girls web site ...... warning nipples! :scared:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Their male viewers are waiting for a Sharon Stone moment.
Edited on Sat Jul-24-10 09:23 PM by TheCowsCameHome
They don't get it at home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. Soft porn. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. Actually, I had watched CBS news, and when Coric came on,
they did the same thing---always had her situated where we had to look at her legs. I found it so insulting that I have changed network news. And this upset me, since I am always glad to see a female make it to the big time and wanted to support her. I suppose the men in power are still using sex since it sells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. Part of the corporate model. Old white guys get some tease and only catch the key words
CNN's daytime anchors' chairs have been moved up in the last few years to at least show some knee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. Because it helps some people's brains fall 4 feet....no thinking
becomes possible about the subject matter at hand....just drooling and thoughts of yes, yes, yes, whatever you say..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. because they are pimps and aiming at the lowest common denominator
and I do mean COMMON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jah the baptist Donating Member (329 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. Sexy nazis. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. That and their swoosh noises keep bitter old men tuning in
It's simple, really, sex and trickery while they shovel their lies out.

It's all run by admen, as is the GOP on the whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
21. There is SO much to attack Faux about, but "sex sells" is not their invention (cf.posts #9 & 12)
For years I watched GMA and not Today, and at at some point Diane SAWYER was doing her interviews in chairs facing the guests, and her legs were out to there and her hems were up to there. And when I checked into Today, there was Katy COURIC with her 5 ft couple-inches, looking like she was six feet tall because her legs, which looked bare, were similarly stretched out and entwined out to there.

In even less politically correct venues, such as Univision, there is a 4 P.M. program that, admittedly is not a strictly "news" show, although they do the first 5 minutes of serious news, but their format is to have a couple of pretty girls with the up and the down and the hair and the hoo----all as they sit at a "news" table which is made of SEE-THROUGH something, with the camera positioned at crotch level. Oh, and the see-through and the camera position shows, what, well, legs and glam shoes of daily changing varieties, all the way to gladiator sandal heel things.

I'm really guessing the comment/question in the o.p. was rhetorical. Here are the co-ANCHORS of Univision's Primer Impacto, with a hint of the see-through table and camera position:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
22. Heck the same reason the republicans always say this
republican female is hot and on an on. As if that is supposed to be prerequisite for a woman...Phewlenty always plays it up...his wife is "hot".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. Could it be there's not much at the other end?
Besides.... they wouldn't be caught wanting to titillate the gays, now would they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
24. Um...because they have nothing else?
No facts or anything like that, so they show some leg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
25. why do they continually have hooters girls on their and the men giggle about how stupid they are?
why do they have every sexually degrading story of females on their show and then are outraged that these women were treated as they are?

a bunch of old farts sittin in front of tv, feeling like a big man.... thru fox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
26. "Dirty Laundry" sums it up.


I make my living off the evening news
Just give me something, something I can use
People love it when you lose, they love dirty laundry

Well, I could've been an actor, but I wound up here
I just have to look good, I don't have to be clear
Come and whisper in my ear, give us dirty laundry

Kick 'em when they're up, kick 'em when they're down
Kick 'em when they're up, kick 'em when they're down
Kick 'em when they're up, kick 'em when they're down
Kick 'em when they're up, kick 'em all around

We got the bubbleheaded bleach-blonde, comes on at 5
She can tell you about the plane crash with a gleam in her eye
It's interesting when people die, give us dirty laundry

Can we film the operation? Is the head dead yet?
You know the boys in the newsroom got a running bet
Get the widow on the set, we need dirty laundry

You don't really need to find out what's going on
You don't really want to know just how far it's gone
Just leave well enough alone, keep your dirty laundry

Kick 'em when they're up, kick 'em when they're down
Kick 'em when they're up, kick 'em when they're down
Kick 'em when they're up, kick 'em when they're down
Kick 'em when they're stiff, kick 'em all around

Dirty little secrets, dirty little lies
We got our dirty little fingers in everybody's pie
Love to cut you down to size, we love dirty laundry

We can do the innuendo, we can dance and sing
When it's said and done, we haven't told you a thing
We all know that crap is king, give us dirty laundry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
28. To prove they haven't hobbled them before they put them out to market.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raggz Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
29. Blanking out their legs
Personally I think it would look weird if they faded out their legs. Women have legs, (men do too)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
name not needed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
30. Sex sells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
31. If they showed their souls, there'd be nothing but dead air
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
32. To take our minds off their asses
(That's just a guess, honest!)

--d!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
33. Because it is the only thing they offer worth looking at.
Just turn down the sound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
34. Because when you show drooling Neanderthals a sexy pair of gams,
they forget that the words coming out of the TV are bald-faced lies, half-truths, and thinly-veiled racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
35. Try watching the local stations in Los Angeles
The "news" is dominated by women in short skirts/dresses with ample cleavage displayed. The weather and traffic reports are the spots where they really shine and they stand up in front of the "blue screen" pointing at things often times exposing even more skin/body parts and different angles. Some appear to be wearing prom dresses. Sometimes it looks like they are wearing lingerie tops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
36. I saw a website once that had pics of several Fox-ettes..all wearing the identical red dress
skin tight & showing a lot of cleavage....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
37. If Doocy can poke his ass out of his shirt collar, why not?
Edited on Sun Jul-25-10 07:43 AM by TheCowsCameHome
just sayin.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
38. One correction.
They ain't wearing nylon stockings. That's more likely tanning bed or spray-on tan and oil on the legs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chillspike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
39. Fox does it for their sexist demographic
Warped political views and warped social values go hand in hand, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
40. Because Fox paid for them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
41. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure it out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC