Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is WikiLeaker prosecuted for info on same "kill squads" Woodward credited (not the surge) for Iraq?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 05:42 PM
Original message
Is WikiLeaker prosecuted for info on same "kill squads" Woodward credited (not the surge) for Iraq?
Woodward up and quoted WH / Pentagon high level sources as saying "the surge" was NOT the reason for the decline in violence in Iraq, it was the kill squads.

And he said IN HIS BOOK (IIRC) that they pled with him not to make this info public, lest American lives be endangered by the enemy's realization that it was Americans, not rival Iraqi terrorists, doing the assassination.

So Woodward basically said in his book that he would not be giving us (the reader) details on these "kill squads" EVEN THO HE HAD the details.

And lest the public think (as most Dems/DUers have since been suckered into thinking, to this very day) that "the surge worked".

Which is why you don't hear daily calls for withdrawal from Iraq.

And why Olbermann APOLOGIZED to his viewers for still doing the "days in Iraq" countdown for a short while before and after the election, "even though violence has declined there" and we're "winning" the illegal war now that a Dem is in charge or somesuch.

And violence has dropped EVEN more in Iraq now that it is a sustainable protectorate, with US troops confined to huge permanent bases guarding the oil fields.

I'm asking because I don't know anything about these "kill squads" other than what Bob Woodward told us.

I haven't read up on the recent leak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thoughts? Anyone?
Someone read up on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. d/p nt
Edited on Mon Jul-26-10 06:00 PM by Leopolds Ghost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Guess not.
No feedback = I must be full of shit on this one :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I can't seem to get an answer on this.
Wikileaks mentioned "kill squads" in Afghanistan. Woodward mentioned them in Iraq. Are assassination teams the basis for our progress in the War on Terror or aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. bump for comment
I know little about this post-Woodward leak and what I've heard about the Wikileaks (most of which has confirmed public assumptions).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Quite honestly, I don't think anyone knows yet.
Edited on Wed Jul-28-10 12:46 PM by AlabamaLibrul
If they do, then I don't have a clue.

If you're referring to the "Collateral Murder" video, I don't know how it relates to these "kill squads".

In regards to the recent leak, I've been pouring through it and it seems to be fairly bland, likely massaged, possibly false in some cases (as in factuality, not authenticity) field reports. Nothing incredibly groundbreaking, except that I notice most of the reports on "demonstrations", in fact, the vast majority of them, describe peaceful protests or funeral processions which are labeled "0 INJ/DAM" as opposed to the ubiquitous file footage of crazed brown people running through the streets, burning shit and firing guns into the air screaming "ALLAHU AKBAR!" in shrill tones.

Again, no clue if or how it ties into Woodward's claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks for the feedback. I guess I don't know enough about this issue.
Frankly, I don't see as how "kill squads" would be any use in Afghanistan anyway. It's a tribal country. In Iraq assassination is practically a civic tradition, so Petraeus may have felt at a disadvantage not going all Israeli on the Mahdi Army to discourage people from taking up arms against us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC