Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18- 42 to perform national service

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:11 AM
Original message
To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18- 42 to perform national service


http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-5741


To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, and for other purposes.

This bill is in the first step in the legislative process. Introduced bills and resolutions first go to committees that deliberate, investigate, and revise them before they go to general debate. The majority of bills and resolutions never make it out of committee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. You want Iraq and Afghanistan over and done with?
This is probably the only way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. you are so right. i have often thought that we should either get out of iraq and afghanistan
or go all in and reinstate the draft. that will never happen of course, but a lot of people who don't currently seem to be paying much attention will care a lot if their husbands/kids get drafted. and it would be descrimination to not include women in this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. "it would be discrimination to not include women in this."
I agree. There is no reason that women shouldn't be fully included in a draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. the only caveat i think would be if there are children involved. one of the parents should be
able to stay home with the kids. of course i know this is currently not the case with both parents enlisted today, but they are volunteers.... and i still think that should be the case currently. a parent should be able to stay home. and if there is one parent only, then they should be able to stay and work on the base. just sayin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
32. Why?
The people that we are bombing can't isolate their children, husbands, daughters,sons or wifes from the bombs. People will abhor war when they have to give up what they value most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #32
42. But there already are lots of people who abhor war
and have young children.

Why punish them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. It is not a punishment
it is the cost of allowing insane wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Yeah, the opportunities in other spheres are just so darn equitable, let's make croaking one, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. 50,000 soldiers died in Vietnam AFTER the draft was put into effect.
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 06:46 AM by pnwmom
The draft didn't hinder the war efforts; all it did was provide more cannon fodder.

The whole justification for getting rid of the draft after Vietnam was to prevent another war from going on that many years and killing that many of our soldiers. Can't we ever learn from history?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. It took these illegal wars to get me to change my mind
About the draft.

The volunteer army makes it too
Easy to abuse at the off set.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm over 45 and I think this is a GREAT idea..
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. My thoughts exactly....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. i'm 37, and i am a woman and i think this should happen, and women should be included.
i don't want to go to a war, but equal rights means equal even in a draft. (they wouldn't want me anyway. i'm overweight. and have bad knees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
26. We had some overweight guys in my platoon in Marine boot camp..
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 06:54 AM by Fumesucker
Or at least they *were* overweight at the beginning..

By the end of boot camp they weren't overweight any more..

Edited for speling.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. I think everyone who advocates for national service, whatever age, should have
to "volunteer."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pkz Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. Young adults need the discipline
and I think military will solve the work ethic of today's 20-40 yr. olds.

Now, I don't mean ALL in that age group, but plenty can use the structure, discipline and values of military living.
So many are spoiled, lazy or just so plain bored in this "all about me" country we live.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Jawohl obergruppenfuhrer..
I agree completely, if there is one thing our country is desperately lacking it is a military mindset.

Especially all those pansy assed liberals and limp-wristed Democrats, some time in the military would make real conservatives he-men out of them.




















:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pkz Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. hey....I don't mean NAZI bootcamp
my real opinion...most kids are lazy and expect "something" for nothing just because they were born!

why? lots of reasons

laziness
boredom
parents with guilt/(just because they can) that showered them with every new thing out there
detached parents, both work, consumed with their own lives


I am just venting, but I have a 14 yr. old grandson here for the summer and you would think telling him to mow the frickin' gas was like saying
no internet for a week....oh the drama....the drama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Do you know how many millions of "kids" are in the U.S.? You wield a mighty broad brush.
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 06:32 AM by WinkyDink
And 14 isn't 20, unless you mean to draft ninth-graders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. Unless one or the other is a well-monied and extremely secure worker/retiree . . .
. . . both parents HAVE to work. No way around it, not unless you live off of Kraft Mac-n-Cheese in a cramped hovel. This isn't the 60s-70s anymore.

And while we're on broad-brushes . . . I'm SO glad your generation, by believing the "Trickle Down" union-busting swill of Reagan and Bewsh I, made today's economic crapcake possible. THANKS LOADS! :eyes: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pkz Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #22
37. well sh*t I am been so grossly misunderstood on this thread
I KNOW both parents have to work.
I had four kids, have four grandchildren, worked since I was fourteen, married a IBEW powerlineman.

I guess I just do not make myself very clear.

I think, and it is only MY opinion obviously, that young people today do not have the work ethic or the desire that my generation had at that age,
for gawd's sake I am only 52.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #22
39. you're welcome
didn't we do such a nice job with the world we handed you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. To be fair, it isn't like we're doing such a bang-up job repairing it.
Seems to me business schools just keep churning out the same Friedmanomic greedbags taught by the Strauss-Hayek forebears.

You would think that in the year 2000, a Reagan pastiche turned up to 100 in all the wrong directions wouldn't even be nearly close in the running for the highest office. But that idiot got two terms. And we're giving someone that makes Bewsh II look like Einstein consideration KNOWING how badly Bewsh II screwed things up?

You would think strides could be made by a younger generation that saw the mistakes of their parents in terms of economics, business, city planning, transportation etc. So far, I'm not really seeing any progress. We have a huge mess to clean up and it's not happening fast enough.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
38. bootcamp is bootcamp
nazi bootcamp was pretty much identical to american bootcamp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
46. You have direct experience with WWII-era German boot camp?
Go volunteer for the Russian army right now and tell me if you make it back that "boot camp is boot camp."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Just what ARE "the values of military living"? Besides not being gay?
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 06:25 AM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pkz Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Structure
Look, I don't want that age group suiting up to kill people!!!!! They can learn trades and rebuild the infastructure of this country.

The values of military living, and oh gawd, believe me...I was raised in a family surrounded by military, Democrats all....
wake up at a certain time, eat at the table with manners, respect others, have a daily task and get it completed, work hard,
be proud of what you accomplished, go to bed at a set time and start all over again tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #17
29. It sounds like grey robotic "stay in line" tedium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
45. did you serve? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. Not being gay and not talking back!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. maybe start with the ones who are all for this war since someone else is risking their life.
and definitely the ones who cry about how bored they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
27. WHAT??? Do you know how it is to start out these days? You speak for
your own 20-40 year olds -- you're certainly not describing the ones I know.

I think anyone who pushes for national service for young people should sign themselves up, instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
13. It doesn't mean only a military draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Toad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
35. Unless Rangel has changed, it does require military training
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 07:14 AM by Ms. Toad
for everyone.

I have not read this one, but he has sponsored similar bills in the past, and his bills have always started with basic military training before the division into civilian/military service. That is not consistent with individuals with a conscientious objection to war.

On edit: He does seem to have changed that portion of his bill - 109(a)

Darn - he's done it so many times I have the knee-jerk Rangel - service = bad idea.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
36. yes its going to be the fun draft with the arts and crafts option
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 07:15 AM by Warren Stupidity
plus all the rich fucks will certainly get drafted and not be given the fun option and we will immediately stop all these stupid wars because the middle class will rise up as one and strike down the gummint with a mitey wind!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. Yes we can use them to clean up BP's oil.
Think of the money we'll save them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
21. The next President could be Sarah Palin. Still think required national service is a good idea? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
24. This idea sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
25. "Yeah, I'll bet we can STOP this meat grinder by clogging it with more kids!"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. +1000. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
30. We're already handing our young people the problem of global warming.
The likelihood that they'll never get from Social Security what they'll have to put into it.

Massive budget deficits.

And now we're going to require national service of them, too?

Sure, that would be a great tactic if we want to push the younger generation into the arms of the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chrisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
31. So, you want to send out more cannon fodder for the government to use?
And to the poster that said the military teaces people "discipline," that doesn't really matter when you're either mentally screwed up for life, or dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pkz Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
33. Rangel has introduced this Bill for 4 consecutive years
it has no co-sponsors and is going no where anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
34. not this shit again
conscription is an abomination. The claim that it prevents wars is patent a-historical bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reformist2 Donating Member (998 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
40. Sorry, I can't support this - it's fascist.
I would think everyone here would be against compulsory service of any kind, excluding national emergencies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
44. Pointless legislation. This bill will go nowhere.
It's just Charlie Rangel's annual draft bill. Just part of his schtick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmosh42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
47. We have a country that thinks it's ok to go shopping to forget about the small percentage of...
our population who 'Have' to continue this useless war. More people need to realize what is happening around this world, and not leave it to a corrupt government to decide who to invade. If people were not worried about the draft during the Vietnam conflict, we would still be there. It kept everyone involved, because they might have a personal stake in the results. And yes, I did 'volunteer' four years active in the US Navy.(1960-64)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC