Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Freepers circle the stupid wagons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 10:31 PM
Original message
Freepers circle the stupid wagons
Disclosure: I'm an engineer, and I'll admit I'm only vaguely familiar with this topic. What was fascinating was the Freeper comments:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2570768/posts

Tide turns against million-dollar maths proof
NewScientist ^ | 8/13/10 | Jacob Aron

Posted on 14-August-2010 7:57:39 PM by LibWhacker

Initially hailed as a solution to the biggest question in computer science, the latest attempt to prove P ≠ NP – otherwise known as the "P vs NP" problem – seems to be running into trouble.


--- Article here: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19313-tide-turns-against-milliondollar-maths-proof.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=online-news


To: LibWhacker

What does this mean in english?

To: Mmogamer

In plain english, it means there are weird but smart people who worry about things so I don’t have to...

To: Mmogamer

This mean theoretical mathematicians have nothing better to do. ... Just pretend you never heard of this story, and the world will continue to move as it always has.



Don't worry Freepers, have faith in your ignorance. Someone else will do the thinking for you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. To be fair, we have a cadre of technophobes here that say similar things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think we all should just go to McDonalds and everything will be fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. On this occssion I would like to offer the following song:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. I couldn't say anything cogent about the equation at all, since I'm practically math illiterate
Knowing the parameters of my limits, I would never dare go off on a tangent with some cynical and sarcastic dig on mathematicians.

However, I do see that a lack of sufficient knowledge has never stopped a gaggle of right wing idiots from reveling to contribute to the sum of their aggregate stupidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aePrime Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. As a computer scientist
To: Mmogamer

This mean theoretical mathematicians have nothing better to do. ... Just pretend you never heard of this story, and the world will continue to move as it always has.

I am a computer scientist, and P vs. NP is our largest unanswered question. I would just like to take the time to point out that this question, while interesting theoretically, also has a huge practical impact. In short, this freeper is completely off base; this is not simply mathematical masturbation. If somebody proved P = NP, your world could potentially change quite dramatically.

The first thing that comes to mind is that we could lose all of the security offered over the internet. If P = NP, the encryption algorithms for credit card transactions could potentially be worthless.

Aside from data security, we could potentially quickly solve a lot of optimization problems that we can only estimate right now. The one that is used for all undergraduate computer science students is the traveling salesman problem (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travelling_salesman_problem). Here's a rather trivial example: imagine you are FedEx, and you need to deliver your packages to a bunch of locations around the city. Believe it or not, there is currently no "efficient" way for a computer to tell you the route to deliver these packages with the least amount of driving. If P = NP, we could potentially figure this out easily, and save gas and time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I thought UPS had a 'right-turn preference' program to route drivers
The idea being that it is quicker to make right turns at intersections than to wait for left turn arrows. That isn't necessarily the 'least amount of driving' distance-wise, but the shortest time-wise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aePrime Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. They do
They do, but this was just an example of a problem that we can't solve efficiently right now. If somebody proved P = NP, we could potentially solve this problem very easily.

The right-turn rule is orthogonal to the problem I was trying to illustrate. If we drove on the left side of the road, they'd have a left-hand rule, as it's just a condition of traffic flow/ traffic laws, and not related to the shortest route. In short, imagine you had the roads all to yourself... . :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC