Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Biden voted for the Bankruptcy bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 11:52 AM
Original message
Biden voted for the Bankruptcy bill
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00044

Now watch this thread sink like a rock because its not about comments about Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. didn't he actually sponsor it?
IIRC, he also voted against any and all of the amendments that would have allowed, elderly, vets, the seriously ill from being exempt. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. More because we all know that already.
Nobody is surprised, and this is probably one of the reasons why he is not well liked in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Biden represents a tall pile of banking interests in Delaware.
I'm sure they notified his office that they'd like his vote on that one.

I'd prefer senators to vote the way I want them to 100% of the time, and as well, Biden isn't my first choice for the nomination anyway, but in this particular case I think he would have paid a political price for opposing the bill.

Just a pragmatic glance at another state's senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah, I see your point. It's like Illinois and ethanol. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Or Louisiana and Oil, Arkansas and Wal-Mart
You can't go 10 feet without running into someone who works for the banking industry or related to someone who works for the banking industry here in Delaware ESPECIALLY northern DE where the bulk of the liberal votes come from.

The bill sucks but I hav no clue what else to say cause oddly enough - I work for the banking industry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. yes he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E-Z-B Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yes, I will never forget that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Neither will I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. yes he did and that's just ONE reason I would never vote for him in the primary.
He'll never win the nomination anyway. I don't have to worry about having to vote for the jerk in the General election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Years ago he might have been able to win but he cannot now.
I also have a thing about the presently elected democratic officials running for president. We need to hold the congress much more than we need a president, although we could use both. If running for president means putting a seat we now hold in danger in 2008 I do not want them to run. I felt only relief when John Kerry said he would use the power he now has to fight the good fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. And the answer to that is 'Gore/Clark '08'.' I dare anybody to come up with a better ticket
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. A good reminder for any who've forgotten.
I wrote to Biden at the time, telling I never would forget, but would remember when this time came.

His candidacy is stillborn in my eyes, and was even before his ill-considered remarks on Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. KICKing
Edited on Wed Jan-31-07 12:29 PM by Nutmegger
because this is an important reminder. We need to remember which Dems stand with the credit card companies, and which don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. he was covering his butt. he DOES come from the
'credit card state'. not that i am excusing him but florida senators vote against offshore drilling and for other issues of particular interest to this state. i would not expect joe biden to vote against the interests of his state, even when i disagree.

unfortunately, some florida legislators also voted for the bankruptcy bill. them i will not excuse. they have no skin in that game.

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. The 'Bankruptcy Bill' was/is egregious, no matter which state you rep.
:puke:, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. So did Hillary and Obama. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. that was my next thought
Thanks for nothing Hillary and Obama. I think I'll strike all of these names as possibilities for the next President! :mad:

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. no they did not
Did you check the link in my OP?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. you're right--thanks for the correction
I had heard Obama voted yes on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Hillary did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. Yes, but what does his house look like?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. Quick question?
I have heard other DUers refer to the BAD choice some DEMS made by voting for this - - - second in stupidity to voting YES on the IWR.

Can someone please share in just a few sentences why this was a BAD vote for We The People?

I'm in no way defending the vote, I'm simply trying to learn a little about it; since the nuances of banking tend to escape my not-into-the world-of-business mind.

Thanks! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. off the top of my head, theres no exceptions for medical bills debt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Key problems with the current Bankruptcy statutes resulting from the bill passed in 2005
An overwhelming number of bankruptcies today are caused by crushing medical bills, not irresponsible borrowing. Many more are caused by job loss of one or more wage-earners in the family.

The new law swept away many consumer protections, including exemptions for serving military and the elderly...oh, but they left quite a few loopholes for the wealthy in it (gee what a surprise!) :sarcasm:

And the same people who were forced to declare bankruptcy through no fault of their own? They get insult added to injury by having to endure mandatory "credit counseling" sessions, in which they get lectured like misbehaving children. Again, if you'd been irresponsible about your borrowing, this would make sense, but shaming a wage earner who's paid their bills all along, but is not crushed under the weight of a spouse's or child's critical care bills, and who may have lost his/her job in the process? Reprehensible.

Digging a little deeper, you'll also find that there are "means tests" which now limit the ability of most people to file Chapter 7 liquidations; forcing them instead to file a Chapter 13 wage earner plan bankruptcy. Just the costs for filing and pursuing a Chapter 13 is vastly more costly than a Chapter 7. Chapter 13s obligate the filer to make a judicially ordered monthly payment for 3 to 5 years -- doesn't matter if you can live on what's left or not. And don't forget that "credit counseling" which will instruct you on how to live on your drastically reduced means.

This isn't debt relief, this isn't getting out from under, this is "I owe my soul to the company store."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Great overview...which leads me to ask...
Why then, would any true DEM support such a bill which clearly puts big money's interest ahead of the peoples' best interest? How could (or was) a vote for this justified?

Thanks mcscajun for the enlightenment. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Justified? I don't believe anyone actually gave us any justification.
We just yelled and screamed our heads off, faxed, called and mailed till our fingers bled, and they just ignored us.

There was a list of those who sold us out to their corporate interests at the time...it's around here on DU somewhere.

You're welcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC