Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP reporting Goodling to Testify before House Judiciary with immunity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 04:50 PM
Original message
AP reporting Goodling to Testify before House Judiciary with immunity
Gonzo is in Europe nest week....I bet he does the G8 summit and then resigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Will anyone have the gumption to keep pressing her?
Or will all her "I don't recall"s suffice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Since she has immunity, I don't believe she can get away with "I don't recalls"
Edited on Thu May-17-07 05:01 PM by AndyA
To get immunity, she agreed to a deal. She has likely already revealed what she knows, because if there's nothing there, she would not have been granted immunity. They want to know what they're getting in return for immunity, so I suspect she'll sing like a Bird.

Cue up Silver Convention:

Fly Amy, Fly
Up up to the sky...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I will hope that you are right. I've seen too much shit to have much faith
anymore, and I don't see much spine in those "committees".

Certainly not what I had hoped for.

If anything comes of it, I think it will be a fluke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gonzo could decide to return via Paraguay. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. It may mean nothing, but I just had an uh-oh moment.
Could this be the moment when somebody testifies who seems to be relatively insignificant, but is the catalyst that starts to bring the whole thing down?
I think of the end of the movie "The Return of the King" when the armies are battling before Mordor and the One Ring is destroyed and Sauron and the great eye come crumbling down. When this is all finished I think we will look back and remember one moment and think, "Ahh, that is when it started and everything started coming apart". It may not be this moment, but in hindsight I think we will remember one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick
Here's hoping that she has agreed to reveal something in exchange for immunity. They wouldn't give her immunity for nothing would they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. She CANNOT lie about anything.
She cannot lie about anything, since they gave her immunity. The committee already knows what she is going to testify to. She has told them in private, similarly to a grand jury. And if she deviates ONE BIT from anything she has told them already, she gets hit with a perjury charge.

The canary in the Watergate case was Alexander Butterfield, who casually mentioned in his testimony that there was a taping system in the Oval Office that Nixon had had installed. That broke the case open. And then John Dean had the conscience, as the President's counsel, to tell the truth. He was a young man at the time. I still have a great deal of respect for him.

I distinctly remember him testifying at the Watergate hearings with his beautiful wife, Maureen, sitting behind him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. and ...she CAN'T leave anything out, or she will be charged and convicted of it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC