Is it safe to say that Whitman has run one of the most negative campaigns in history?
I've never seen such blatant partisan bickering and childish name-calling and finger-pointing than I have in Meg Whitman's campaign, whose commercials now seem to be running every 3 1/2 seconds. Really it's nauseating and I cant wait for this campaign to be over. :puke:
The primary ads ALONE were fueling my rage because they were so fucking negative and anti-liberal. Seriously I agree that Tuesday cant come soon enough.
5. the ad she has now with some old clip of brown from inside edition or some other
tabloid show is pretty disgusting.
she is just a nasty person. it's probably one of the first times the negative campaiging is hurting the person who is running it rather than the one it's intended to hurt.
it might have been effective with others but Brown is well known in California so people just don't believe those things about him.
her best way of winning would actually have been if she said Brown was a good guy but she has the better ideas to improve the state and focused on the issues and more on what she herself would do.
but of course the only things she has to offer are the failures of past republicans. so she had to attackhim personally hoping it would help her win.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.