Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPM: Blue Dog caucus in the House was decimated yesterday, cut from 54 to 26 members

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:44 AM
Original message
TPM: Blue Dog caucus in the House was decimated yesterday, cut from 54 to 26 members
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/11/until_the_last_blue_dog_dies.php?ref=fpblg

and the DINOs are saying we need to move the party to the right? It's past time to give progressives a seat at the table and support the Democratic platform instead of attempting to placate the GOP/corporatists.
:mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. I guess voters prefer real rethugs to pseudo ones. No loss with the disappearance of these cretins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. Yes, actually I would. That way when they do stupid things like vote
with Repubs on virtually everything, backstabbing LGBTs, the middle class, and unions, then at least it will be a Repub that gets blamed and not a Dem. That does matter. DINOs give the illusion that Dems are responsible for our current positions, had they each and every one been correctly aligned with their political ideologies, then real Dems would now be occupying those spots perhaps.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Blue Dogs pissed on the parade....
we should have steamrolled the repukes for the last two years, but they stood in the way, and here we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'll try hard to find a tear.
Sorry, but I'm NOT sorry to see Costa go. I know this little turd and, believe me, the description is right on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. If we had to lose seats, I'm thrilled that it was half the DINO's. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. True, but the other half (or more) included some real progressives and non-Blue Dogs.
The Progressive Caucus fared much better than the Blue Dog Caucus. Of course, they generally come from more liberal districts than Blue Dogs, but I'll take a good showing from the CPC reps.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/5061-progressives-emerge-unscathed

"The hard-core Left represented by members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus in the House of Representatives will survive essentially undamaged in today’s mid-term elections.
Only one member of the CPC lost in the primary election, and only one other member is predicted to lose in today’s election, according to the Cook Political Report. Three other members of the caucus are in races too close to call. The other 77 members of the CPC will keep their seats."

"The DSA (Democratic Socialist of America) website is equally candid about its support for the CPC and its purposes: “Many socialists have seen the Democratic Party, since at least the New Deal, as the key political arena in which to consolidate this coalition, because the Democratic Party held the allegiance of our natural allies.”

Through control of the government by the Democratic Party coalition, led by anti-corporate forces, a progressive program regulating the corporations, redistributing income, fostering economic growth and expanding social programs could be realized. It’s attack on free markets and private property is explicit: “A democratic socialist politics for the 21st century must promote an international solidarity dedicated to raising living standards across the globe, rather than ‘leveling down’ in the name of maximizing profits and economic efficiency…. Democratic socialists are dedicated to building truly international social movements — of unionists, environmentalists, feminists, and people of color — that together can elevate global justice over brutalizing global competition.”

Active members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus include Reps. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), Roland Burris (D-Ill.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), John Conyers (D-Mich.), Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.), Barney Frank (D-Mass.), Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Texas), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Jim McDermott (D-Wash.), Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.), Laura Richardson (D-Calif.), Bobby Rush (D-Ill.), Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.), Pete Stark (D-Calif.), Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), and Henry Waxman (D-Calif.). Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) served on the executive committee, but is not currently listed as a member."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's a start.
Fake republicans losing to real republicans and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. yeee-up... and if they continue to say that, I will leave the party
I registered Democratic Party and have only voted Democratic... but now, I think maybe it is time to move on and start voting for leftists outside of this party since they don't seem to be welcome. EVEN NOW they still won't get it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. just great....
So now we have a whole bunch of Reps who vote Dem NONE of the time instead of SOME of the time.

This is what I call cutting off your face to spite your nose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. If we would just move an inch to the left....
...we might attract 10% of the 50% of American voters who never vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. Silver lining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. I think it's high time to admit we have a GOP fifth column in the Democratic party.
And anyone who doesn't think the GOP is actively working from within to subvert the party and drive it to the right is kidding themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. One has only to go back to see who funded Bill Clinton in his initial run for president
Jackson Stephens rivals Bath in his role as conduit between high-level factions. A Little Rock, Arkansas tycoon who attended the U.S. Naval Academy with Jimmy Carter and staked Sam Walton to found Wal-Mart in 1970, Stephens was owner of the notoriously toxic WTI Incinerator in East Liverpool, OH, and a munificent contributor to the campaign warchests of both Bill Clinton and George Bush, Sr. He was also embroiled in the BCCI affair through his association with BCCI satellite Union Bank of Switzerland—UBS, in turn, contributed $25 million to the moribund Harken Energy Corp.

http://www.wburg.com/0202/arts/lombardi.html

It was Clinton behind the corporatist policies (MFN status for China, NAFTA, repeal of Glass Steagall, Telecom Act of '96) that allowed the corporatist take over of this country. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. Perhaps that fact is the silver lining in all this. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
12. I'm not sure there's room at the table, what with all of the corporations and all.
It's nice that the Blue Dog caucus has been weakened, but it's really time to throw out their benefactors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
13. Silver lining?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
16. Evan "Corporate Tool" Bayh has an Op-Ed...
in the Times this morning. I refuse to link to that pile of dogshit on the paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Thank you. No one cares to hear what that corporatist pos has to say.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
18. Good. That should tell these stupid DLC and Blue Dawgs
that we're not accepting any more fake Republicans when they can vote for the real thing EVERY time.

Harry S Truman had it dead on. He knew what he was seeing. God bless that man.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. So if a move to the Left was necessary, why did Feingold and Grayson lose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
20. Well then, our top priority needs to be finding more Republicans to convert!
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC