Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Half Of The Blue Dogs Lost Their Seats........

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:47 PM
Original message
Half Of The Blue Dogs Lost Their Seats........
who voted them out? Dems or Repugs? Did they lose because Dems crossed over to beat them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Their worst attribute is that they misled us about our own majority.
So goodbye, now elect progressives among the cave people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here we go with the Blue Dog BS again, if they weren't
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 08:53 PM by doc03
Blue Dogs to start with they wouldn't have been elected. My Congressman got voted out for one single reason he voted for the HCR bill. Grayson got voted out, how do you explain that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Right. Blue dogs got replaced with Republicans & it will be a long time before a Dem
ever holds those seats again. Blue Dogs are Blue Dogs because they like to get reelected. Politicians dearly love to get reelected.

I'd much rather have a Blue Dog who votes with the party 75% of the time compared to a Republican who never does, and who counts in the Democratic column toward a majority.

If my rep was a Blue Dog I would vote for him in a heartbeat to keep out a Republican/Teabagger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe,
But it could be that voters couldn't vote for anyone on the ticket and just stayed home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. It just means that we never had the majority we thought we had.
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 09:00 PM by Skink
of course now the other side has its speaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KILL THE WISE ONE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. so we will not need to do any party purification then ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC