Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Olbermann or MSNBC Actually Pull the Plug on "Worst Persons" Segment?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
YankeeLeft7x Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 07:55 PM
Original message
Did Olbermann or MSNBC Actually Pull the Plug on "Worst Persons" Segment?
Ever since Olbermann pulled the plug on the "Worst Persons in the World," which was a staple of the show, and a book title (of his), I have wondered to myself whether he was forced or pushed into ending this segment.

In light of this situation, I not only ask myself this again, but wonder what others here at DU think?

Isn't kind of oddballish to think Olbermann all of a sudden pulled the plug on "Worst Persons" but that he may bring it back in the future if it's warranted?

After all, most often this segment targted right-wing jerks and perhaps the corporate bosses did not like it at GE/NBC/MSNBC.

Just asking folks. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redirish28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. I honestly believe he himself did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think it's very suspicious
Edited on Fri Nov-05-10 08:00 PM by Raine
it was unsettling at the time and in retrospect there is something really smelly about it. x(

Edit: wanted to add I think he pulled it himself but I wonder if he was trying to pull back or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. This whole thing stinks for the past week.
I'm sure more will come out about what's going on eventually. I definitely think there's more to this story though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Nelson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. My thought was that he was just giving the
"Worst Person" segment a rest... like when he retired Bill Orally for a spell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. And why should they decide what is on TV?

morcheeba - world looking in
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUNl0l8x-fE


I feel fine, don't really need to know who is correct or not, however from personal observations, anyone with over a few millions of assets, are not able to defend their humanity. With that level of obligation most in those categories fail miserably.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Golden Rule, (R) style: He who has the gold makes the rules...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. That is not the golden rule.
Nor is it a just rule, besides all that has to happen is to change what 'gold' is and suddenly everything flips around, and the rules applied back would not work out for those that believe that.

So I think representative democracy with education and accurate information systems are best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. He said it was a 'unilateral' decision on his part. I take him at his word.
I don't think he saw this coming, IMO. He knows how to play subtle and blow dog whistles - and he didn't do that this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WizardLeft62 Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. Good Question anyhow
Who knows but Keith probably got sick of it.....How gullible.....Yeah? No!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think maybe he pulled it as a last ditch effort to appease the
new Comcast suits, because he already knew the suspension was coming and thought maybe that would mollify them. I do not think he would have done it unless he was being pressured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. When did Comcast permission to buy? Are they responsible for trying to kill NBC's broadcast wing? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC