Questions for the "fight them there so we don't have to fight them here" nitwits

[MN ChimpH8R]

1. How are they going to get here? They are six thousand miles away. No navy, no air force. Are they going to swim here? Use the transporter from "Star Trek"?

2. Even if they somehow got here, how would 15-25,000 extremists armed with nothing more than AK-47s and homemade bombs conquer a nation of 300,000,000 and :sarcasm: "take our freedoms"? The major LA street gangs would cut them to ribbons in a matter of days. Just how is this conquest possible in any remotely rational universe?

3. Why would we let them into the country in the first place?

Next time you hear a Bushbot repeat this singularly empty-headed and meaningless straw man, ask away.

[uppityperson]

1. They are here already because of our lax illegal policies, see?

And you just never know, they might be next door.

Indeed, "they" cannot conquer a nation this big, but fear that "they might be next door" will keep the nitwits scared because, after all, boo.

[Quantess]

2. it's so effing stupid.

Not to mention the fact that we are actually less able to defend our homeland when we are "fighting them over there".

"Next time you hear a Bushbot repeat this singularly empty-headed and meaningless straw man", ask him or her, "how f^#%ing stupid are you, anyway?"

[katty]

3. powerful, scary, mentally ill, disturbed, dangerous NITWITS

[TahitiNut]

4. We'll be protected by the Iraqi forces when they "stand up."

Isn't it obvious? After all, Dear Leader says it'll be OK to leave Iraq when the Iraqi forces take over ... so he obviously believes the Iraqi forces will make it so "we don't have to fight them here."

If anyone can actually make sense of that, they have a far more malleable sense of 'logic' than I.

[treestar]

5. Maybe the Canadians or Mexicans intend to offer them a base of

operations? :sarcasm: