Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Outsourcing and the 21st-Century Economy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 11:43 AM
Original message
Outsourcing and the 21st-Century Economy

Outsourcing and the 21st-Century Economy


By CRAIG BARRETT AND JAMES P. MOORE JR.

It's campaign season, so "outsourcing" is being used as a four-letter word. The practice of hiring workers overseas to handle certain functions of American corporations is, according to some politicians, a major cause of our ongoing economic woes.

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D., Calif.) has slammed her opponent, Carly Fiorina, for outsourcing jobs when she served as CEO of Hewlett-Packard. Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland has attacked his Republican opponent, John Kasich, for serving on the board of a company that outsources. And other politicians from Pennsylvania to Oregon have tried to use the issue to stir up voter dissatisfaction with the economy.

The Democratic leadership in the Senate has also used outsourcing as a political football. This week, three days before the projected close of the 111th Congress, Democrats brought a bill to the floor that would penalize companies that outsource. The Creating American Jobs and Ending Offshoring Act was intended to provide a payroll tax holiday to companies that shift overseas jobs back to the United States. It would also have limited the use of tax deferrals that allow U.S. companies to postpone paying taxes on foreign income until after the funds are transferred to the U.S.

The bill never received an up-or-down vote, as it failed to receive the 60 votes necessary for cloture. But merely by bringing it up, Senate Democrats showed their preference for campaign-season symbolism over serious recognition of why companies choose to outsource.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703882404575520232436064498.html


Sure they use the word "Outsourcing" when they want your vote - but when time comes to actually do some thing about it they turn tail and run to their corporate masters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Free Traders in Both Parties have doomed this country.
Yes it is a Republican issue but watch votes and name
the Democrats who vote for all these trade policies.

Part of the reason we lost Ohio, the Republicans here
used Bill Clinton as the poster child for free trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OlympicBrian Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is THE single most important jobs/deficit/economic issue
Because of a tax loophole, there is a self-reinforcing loop which leads companies to invest in jobs overseas. As a result, we lose jobs, and our tax base is eroded, and we generate less revenues, etc. etc.

And then there is the "multiplier effect" on the local small-business community for the many US jobs lost to offshoring.

TOO MUCH TALK...TOO LITTLE ACTION.

Get on top of this one folks, the sooner the better!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OlympicBrian Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Background article on offshoring...
Post-Recession Job Recovery Hampered by Offshoring
...
(1) US Tax write-downs which allow companies to move operations overseas, while gaining tax benefit from shuttered US operations. That's right, everyone gets to pay for that factory shipped to China.
...
(3) US Tax loopholes which allow corporations to permanently postpone repatriation of profits gained overseas, that leads them to both avoid paying US corporate income taxes, and to re-invest in overseas operations instead of in the US (which means no new US jobs
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9646348
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OlympicBrian Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Having trouble seeing full text since not WSJ subscriber :-( nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OlympicBrian Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OlympicBrian Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC