Wikileaks and the Reactionary Impulse to Repress
By Matthew Rothschild
Editor of The Progressive
November 30, 2010
The single biggest Wikileaks revelation is not that the Saudis are still funding Al Qaeda, or that Hillary Clinton ordered the State Department to spy on foreign diplomats and the U.N., or that many Arab countries favor an attack on Iran.
No, the real eye-opener is the reactionary impulse of people in power to repress those who disseminate information.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called the disclosure “not just an attack on America’s foreign policy interests. It is an attack on the international community.”
Rep. Peter King echoed her comments, saying, “This is worse even than a physical attack on Americans, it’s worse than a military attack.”
.... Sen. Joe Lieberman said the Wikileaks staff had “blood on their hands.”
Lieberman, Clinton, and King are trying to convict Wikileaks with guilt by hyperbole.
Fundamentally, in a democracy, we, as citizens, deserve to know what our government is up to. The State Department is not the preserve of the Mandarins, and we are not peasants to be kept in the dark.
We are not treated as citizens. We are treated as subjects of a ruling elite. This elite gets to decide what we are told and what we are not told. And we’re just supposed to grin and bear it.
But a democracy shouldn’t be afraid of information and public knowledge.
The more, the better, as far as I’m concerned.
It’s no sin, to let us, as citizens, in on things for a change.
Actually, it’s kind of refreshing.
Please read the full article at:
http://www.progressive.org/wx1130b10.html