|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
coti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 12:49 AM Original message |
Are DUers just not up for the fight with the Republicans now? Are YOU kidding me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 12:50 AM Response to Original message |
1. Wonder why they didn't do it *before* the election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 12:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yeah, but they're doing it now. And now people are just all finished?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
3. Good tactic, wrong strategu |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:00 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. If it's such an election-winner, you wonder why they waited... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:02 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. According to some reports, they waited because of blue dogs in the House. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:23 AM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Perhaps I am confused but this IS the lame duck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:01 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. As I noted above, what does that have to do with anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:11 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. sort of speaks to its efficacy as an election strategy, as per your OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:17 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. No, the idea is that it wouldn't have passed the House due to the weak-kneed, fearful Dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
veganlush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
7. it feels more like they are making |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:06 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I think the Dem ARE playing the game of chicken. Yeah, we've got folks like Matthews poo-pooing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:11 AM Response to Original message |
10. the president prefers we be bipartisan and he's the boss....of something lol nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
veganlush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
11. the other failure here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:49 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. That's EXACTLY why I'm pushing this so hard. The Republicans actually voted AGAINST middle-class |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
veganlush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 02:12 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. you couldn't have read my post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 02:15 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I certainly did. This is about getting the message out. Which is what my OPs are about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:52 AM Response to Original message |
15. Coti-they're NOT HERE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 02:01 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Mine meets once a month up the road |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
veganlush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 02:19 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. you couldn't have read my post either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
veganlush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 02:26 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. so that fact that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC