Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If soldiers are not mature enough to accept gay soldiers, they don't belong in the military.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:06 PM
Original message
If soldiers are not mature enough to accept gay soldiers, they don't belong in the military.
Edited on Fri Dec-03-10 02:07 PM by LLStarks
I'm going to keep saying this until it sinks in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Also, if a gay soldier is incapable of conducting themselves appropriately, they too do not belong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. KNR!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theaocp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. All hail, Lady Gaga's army! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Start with the leadership
Serious. Most rank and file don't give a shit...but many Colonels and generals do...it shows the generational split.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's their job to make sure there are no problems with repealing DADT but they refuse. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoreline Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Quite right...
...I am former military and know some of those colonels and generals (and captains and admirals) that you speak of. Here's the by service leadership breakdown: The Marine Corps is a testosterone fueled blood circus that most folks don't want to know about - if we were to get rid of the military, we'ed still keep them - if you want people dead and stuff broken, give them a call; the modern Navy is a legacy of three things: A. T. Mahan's book, the Panama Canal, and WWII - it is an anachronistic aristocracy; the Army is a giant social program money pit wrapped in cammo and the flag; and the Air Force is the military equivalent of the 700 Club, overrun with evangelical Christians. Rank and file doesn't care about this issue (except the ones who can't think for themselves), fraternization has always been a no-no, and that's not going to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Hubbub is a retired submariner
And I served somewhere else, where quite frankly I didn't care as long as people did their job. One of my kids was open, which led to a one way talk with one of my older people. Yep, we had some tension, ironically after a while they were good friends, so when we're told this will be bad for good order...of course it will if leadership keeps sending these signals...

It is up to senior people to draw lines...and once you do, it is pretty much a non-issue.

Oh and the AF will be trouble soon, due to who's taken it over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. As we have been told over and over 'the world ain't fair, suck it up and deal"
As a gay citizen I have taken a lot of crap over the years and am really about fed up to there with it. I don't think I need to reiterate. I was a gay sailor, not very long at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. I can see it now - the draft comes back, and in order to be classified 4F,
instead of pretending to be gay, young men pretend to be homophobes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'll take it a step further
I was in the Army. Got drafted. Served a 13 month tour of duty in Vietnam.

FROM START TO FINISH, NO ONE EVER ASK MY OPINION ABOUT SHIT !

Sorry to yell, but since when do the brass give a rats ass about what troops think ?

Half my company was gay, including the company commander. SOME ASSHOLES WERE UPTIGHT, BUT NOBODY GAVE A SHIT ABOUT THEIR HANGUPS. Do your fucking job and STFU ! That was the rule then and I'll bet it hasn't changed since 1965,

:evilfrown:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Well it had not changed at least up to the early 80s when I was in
I did myob and was very discreet about when, where, who. Someone got into some trouble and named names in short we were contacted and told go very quietly and soon or it will be a big public disgrace for your family so on. I was threatened with time in the brig, if I did not say who I knew.
I did not tell and I did go 'quietly' as possible.

I knew there were a whole lot of gays on the ship we sort of knew each other and the guy in trouble named a whole list of names that was not supposed to be handed around, but there was a yeoman in the xos office....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Big K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLoner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Absolutely right! I served with gays and had NO problem doing so. n/t K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. I believe that our soldiers are, with very few exceptions, mature enough, LLStarks.
That was the beauty of this massive study, which now sits on top of so many other studies that came to the same conclusion: our troops can handle this and will do so with great ease. They already know they have homosexuals in their midst and many of them cover for them.

Our troops are bigger in spirit, in heart and in maturity than the policy makers.

K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. +100
:patriot: Would that politicians had as much integrity...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm sure this has been pointed out before, but what we are seeing are exactly
the same arguments they put forth against racial integration and sexual integration.

The troops don't care, this is just more old men feeling like their power is going to somehow be diminished. And the irony of McSame "taking point" on this issue is simply hysterical.
:kick: & R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. They don't need to be mature (and let's face it, a lot of them are kids)--
they just need to follow rules and orders. That's it, the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. Soldiers are required to follow a code of conduct
regardless of how that code changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. Agreed: one follows orders or is court martialed.



They can have whatever private thought they want, but treating fellows service men and women with respect (i.e., not discriminating them) is requirement of the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savalez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. IMO the idiot/racist/bigot/phobe level in the "soldier" population
is the same as that in the civilian population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 15th 2024, 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC