Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, I guess now the Repukes will scuttle the Inheritance Tax. I won't be

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
theophilus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:37 AM
Original message
So, I guess now the Repukes will scuttle the Inheritance Tax. I won't be
a bit surprised. This country is going down while the band plays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MikeFoxtroters Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm torn on this
I understand the need for collecting this high level of revenue but at the same time I find it very....I guess immoral for lack of a better word. A family member just died and the government swoops in and takes 50% of their life's work before the family gets a penny of what the person worked a lifetime to provide them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theophilus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I look at it as Buffy and Trey have to pay tax on what Daddy passes on. Maybe I'm wrong but
the heirs have done little or nothing to earn this money, for the top money hoarders, so I think they can give up a share. Maybe someone can clarify if this is wrong. The dead don't care about taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. No, sir, that's not how it works.
We're not talking about what an ordinary person leaves his family. We're talking about vast estates that create a perament, inherited aristocracy, something the revolution was supposed to have done away with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeFoxtroters Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. 55% of $675,000 and above
is what it is set to revert back to. I'm not sure how $675k divided amongst siblings or even to one person constitutes an aristocracy. I'm also not aware of the revolution you are referencing unless you are referring to the American revolution in which case I'm just going to laugh at you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. We've only had one revolution.
Laugh all you want. The rich have screwed you as badly as they have screwed the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. It's not a flat 55% rate for every dollar over 675K & because of credits estates under 1M don't owe
anything. Even when the estate tax does kick in it's graduated up to the 55% rate.

That said, most in Congress would agree that the threshold for estate taxes is too low. The reason the law is reverting is because of the MOCs who think ANY estate tax is too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeFoxtroters Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. the estate tax is not
graduated. It is a set percentage on any inheritance above the determined amount. When it expires it will be 55% on everything above $675,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. (1)unified credit makes the minimum taxable level 1M , (2) estate tax pre-2001 was graduated.
See here, Table 1 :
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/108xx/doc10841/Estate_GiftTax_Brief.shtml

If you are aware of a reliable source that contradicts the CBO please cite it.

However, even under a law where 55% of every dollar over 1M is taxed at 55% an estate of 2M would have an effective tax rate 27.5%.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Taxes suck.
Why is it less immoral to tax the wages of a person instead of their inheritance? If taxes are punishment (a debatable proposal) then I'd rather punish people for not working.

If I earn $35,000 this year building boats, I'm taxed 15% + income taxes. If I earn $3.5 million, I'm taxed roughly $1m. If I inherit $3.5 million... no tax. The tax code is written by people who don't work for the benefit of people who don't work.

Unearned income is taxed essentially not at all in this country, and the result is unemployment and wealth concentration.

Better to simply end the estate tax and tax it as income for the recipient just like earned income.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeFoxtroters Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I could go for that
tax it as income at the already established rates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Bear in mind...
The first dollar of inheritance would be taxed at income tax rates. No $675,000 standard deduction. It'd be a big windfall for society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. This is in an effort NOT to create a new form of nobility
the Founding Fathers understood this. Modern Americans, not so much.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Papagoose Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. How many people actually pay the inheritance tax?
I am by no means an expert - I barely understand my own taxes - but I've always thought that people had a million ways around paying any inheritance taxes with a little planning before death.

I could be completely wrong...just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well, that's for the probate estate...
...but there is nothing preventing Congress from taxing non-probate assets like trusts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Typically less than 2% of estates owe the tax.
In 2010 of course none of them will.

There are many ways to lower the liability through gifts during life --for example, you can give someone 13,000 per year without owing a gift tax, up to a lifetime limit. Another common way to lower the tax is through charitable donations and trusts.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Republicans will enact all of our worst nightmares and the
President is unlikely to wield his veto power. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Execlib Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. Even Bill Gates is giving a lot of his wealth away.
I'm sure his offspring won't want for anything though. It's a tough call. As a child I remember reading about a family business that bellied up because they couldn't pay estate taxes.

It was a small deli that was always busy till the old man died. The family couldn't find a buyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. scuttle? this year there *is* no inheritance tax. that was part of the bush tax cuts,
effective this year.

they're going to get it extended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. Don't worry. They'll make up for it by ending mortgage tax deductions.
And anything else that helps the middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC