Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Well, duh!--- Baby Boomers - Ripped Off By Ronald Reagan (Matt Taibbi/RS)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:28 AM
Original message
Well, duh!--- Baby Boomers - Ripped Off By Ronald Reagan (Matt Taibbi/RS)
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 11:29 AM by kpete
taibbi:

Social Security was never the cause of the nation's debt problems. This issue dates all the way back to the Eighties, when Ronald Reagan hired Alan Greenspan to chair the National Commission on Social Security Reform, ostensibly to deal with a looming shortfall in the fund. Greenspan's solution was to hike Social Security tax rates (they went from 9.35% in 1981 to 15.3% in 1990) and build up a "surplus" that could be used to pay Baby Boomers their social security checks 30 years down the road.

They raised the SS taxes all right, but they didn't save the money for any old Baby Boomers in the 2000s. Instead, Reagan blew that money paying for eight years of deficit spending and tax cuts. Three presidents after him used the same trick. They used about $1.69 trillion in extra Social Security revenue (from the Greenspan hikes) to pay for current-day goodies, with the still-being-debated Bush tax cuts being a great example. This led to the infamous moment during Bush's presidency when Paul O'Neill announced that the Social Security Trust Fund had no assets.

Well, duh!
That is what happens to a fund, when you spend 30 years robbing it to pay for tax cuts for Jamie Dimon and Lloyd Blankfein. It will tend to get empty. But of course this wasn't presented to the public as being the consequence of too many handouts to wealthy campaign contributors: this was presented as a problem of those needy goddamned old people wanting to retire too early and being just far too greedy when it came to actually wanting their Social Security benefits paid out.

And so in all seriousness none other than Alan Greenspan proposed back in 2004 that the "social security problem" be rectified by means of reforms that should sound familiar to those reading the news of late: raising the retirement age and cutting benefits.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/matt-taibbi/blogs/TaibbiData_May2010/239443/83512
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. But he was a REAL American who recognized that government was the problem, righhhht? ;-) n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. In this case, Reagan was right.

The government he created stole our fucking money. I would have to agree THAT government is a pretty big problem.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. As well as illegally funding the Contra war, allowing CIA "contractors' to deal coke, etc. n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. And this from P.J. O'Rourke...
"The Democrats are the party that says government will make you smarter, taller, richer, and remove the crabgrass on your lawn. The Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." ~P.J. O'Rourke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Correction - EVERYONE (but the wealthy) was ripped off by Reagan.
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 12:15 PM by progressoid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And his admirers.
Kindest term for them, I am feeling generous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. As I have long proffered on this board: Greenspan, a name that will live in
infamy. Greenspan, the architect of the multi-trillion transfer of wealth from working people to those who already own some 95% of the wealth. It doesn't get much better than this. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
voteearlyvoteoften Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. am kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. There are moments when I find Taibbi irritating
This is not one of them. He is dead center on the point here. The biggest tax increase in history, at least at the time, burden placed entirely on the working classes, plundered to the last cent largely for military misadventures and tax cuts for the wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. And this is how SS is tied to the deficit.
It's not SUPPOSED to be. Remember when everyone laughed at Al Gore's "lock box" comment?

Same reason why states & corporations are trying to welch on pension funds. They mismanaged them and belong in jail. Instead they attack the workers who've held up their end of the contract.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Ya know the REALLY bad thing about corps not standing by their..........
...........legal contracts to pay for retirees? It's the fucking courts ALL side with the corps. Talk about rule of law, the US and state courts regularly let corps out of a LEGAL contract with their employees (who in some cases may represented by a union).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Fascism really is all about rich people being able to steal everybody
else's money and get by with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. You may be looking for another source of blame
Handing over the keys to the Treasury to defense contractors and corrupt bankers is where the problem lies, not those who paid into the system in good faith.
Giving tax cuts to the top 2% in a time of war is a bad idea. They are the ones who make profits from war.
It's high time we make the war profiteers accountable and seize their assets. Dick Cheney and his mini me Bush come to mind. And that's just for starters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. The "government can't do anything right" argument fails for many reasons
...most notably all the successful social programs all over the world, and in this country as well, administered by government. In any case, government is nothing but a segment of "we the people", and to say that people outside of government (corporations?) are more trustworthy than people inside of government is unlikely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. Does anybody in this thread realize there are US treasury bonds in the SS trust fund?
The trust fund hasn't been stolen or squandered just yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. That's what I have read consistently here
...having been at one time part of the "social security is doomed" crowd due to misunderstanding how it works. As I have been told, income to SS fund is received in cash and immediately transferred to T-bills. Of course that means that SS funds become government-backed debt, though it is still the case that this is quite secure and trusted far more than corporate debt (bonds).

So the fund is full of T-bills - the famous IOU's so derisively and regularly proclaimed on talk radio - while the cash itself is used for more current needs. Given the nature of the system its hard to think of a better way to do it, both for the security of the principal and for the stability of the interest earned. It is worth noting that in every "troubled time" the US t-bills are still considered a refuge for funds world-wide, in spite of all the "government can't do anything right" repugs who would rather have an ideology-affirming collapse than prosperity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
17. Another excellent article by Matt Taibbi! Describes what bugs me so well.
That Washington faux-centrist consensus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yeah, this has to be the greatest ripoff of the American citizens............
..............by their very own government since ??????????????????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
florida08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
22. well yes and no
indeed they have um "borrowed" from SS for anything but what it is meant for. And yes I would use the word stolen. However what they did was to replace the real money with unmarketable bonds, or so we're told. 2.5 trillions dollars worth. The issue is they don't want to pay it back. They are,according to the government website, back by the full faith of the US government.

Well maybe they are and maybe they aren't. Like rucky said..up this thread..it's why they're tied to the deficit. The republicans and the IMF said those bonds should be defaulted on. And now since they're giving more big bonuses with our SS payments it will be even harder for it to survive unless there is a huge national outrcy. It has been discussed here many times from great posters.

The argument is no one is stating we should default on China who holds almost a trillion in bonds..so why are they suggesting to default on us? Simple. Class warfare..marginalize the 97% and replace them with the top 2-3 percent who not only pad their campaigns through PAC donations but a promises of a nice cushy job in case they retire from Congress. Some are saying that only property owners should be able to vote..how long before that happens. Then of course those, like in the game monopoly, with the most property have a bigger vote.

I'm telling you democracy is and has been under attack for a very long time. First you defund them them you change the message. SS is marxism. Lower class living off the upper. It's a lie but what have they said that wasn't? Death panels..killing grandma. Obama isn't an American. And now with the Bush tax cuts extended with the starve the beast assault, and by the way WE are the beast, you can look for the next round of attacks to be SS with the help of some democrats who will remain silent about how we were robbed.

Beck and Limbaugh are already putting out the message of how the democrats are fueling the recession with unemployment handouts.

IMF
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/09/the_imf_wants_the_us_government_to_default_on_the/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrarundale Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. ZZZZ. He's so good at reporting old news
Maybe he can get a job with Julian Assange. But he's so hip working for Rolling Stone 'n all. Now, what corporation owns it/him now?? Can't keep track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. can I tell you something about Reagan?
he gave the military a pay raise, BUT he took away allowances at the same time. (explanation for some people. military get base pay, and then some people get allowances for such things as hazardous duty ie war, being away from the family, being stationed in a high rent area. allowances are temporary and not counted as pay for reasons of retirement pay) So after a pay raise from Reagan and taking away our allowances, my husband actually came in 6 dollars less per pay day. BUT he raised everyone's base pay and then their retirement pay went up. Unintended consequences probably. They just did not think ahead. And this made a problem for the military and the national budget. Reagan thought he was being cute but all he did was screw up.

He screwed up SS by trying to be cute about that too. They should have hired some mathematicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Reagan didn't want mathematicians
He wanted slick-talking salesmen. When OMB DIrector David Stockman pointed out the fallacies in Reagan's math, he (Stockman) was "taken to the woodshed".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
26. My mother said he would ruin her old age - she didn't realize
it would have a generation later. The ones who voted him in, like the young people today who believe these libertarian and republican lies. They have no idea these guys have been telling the same stories for decades. They believe unions are bad but don't realize that is how holidays, vacation days, sick days, 40 hour work weeks came into being and as those have been dissolved so have those extras.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
27. Reagan was just the fart from satan's ass, bush was the real turd...
between the two of them, "Reagan paving the road, bushII driving down it at 720mph created a huge fiscal hole that is swallowing us up. There are so many fists in the pot it's disgusting just trying to figure out who's who. But this is the GOP for you, they always set the country up for disaster, and then leave it to others to clean up. Remember...hundreds of billions in cash went missing in the Middle East...and that is helping to fund those we are fighting against. Incredibly, we are arming what are called our enemies///leave it to a Republican to come up with that brain fart...:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC