Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will LGBT Americans Be The Next Ones To Walk the Plank Just In Time for the Holidays?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:26 PM
Original message
Will LGBT Americans Be The Next Ones To Walk the Plank Just In Time for the Holidays?
Today Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said that he now believes that the horrific Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy will still be "around" because the Senate will not be able to repeal it before the end of the year. Say that again?

Does anyone actually believe that the Secretary of Defense would just make such a statement without White House prior knowledge?

Was this comment by Gates the first of many more trial balloons to be sent from the White House by the President's Staff to prepare LGBT Americans for the coming let down?

Is that is how it goes down? With chickenshit pre-scripted statements?

Barack Obama promised HE would end DADT this year.

Well, he has 25 days left.

He will not be able to blame the Senate for this failure. He is the President.

The President could stop the enforcement of the policy immediately without needing it to be repealed. In fact, he could have done it on the day he was sworn in on that Bible standing next to his treasured friend, Rick Warren.

This statement by Gates is just sickening. Have these people no shame?

Change we could believe in?

Twenty-five days to end DADT. If the President can't achieve it with the Senate, then he must keep his word and order the immediate stop of all DADT dismissals.

We will know if Barack Obama is a man of his word or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. LGBT have our own plank. It's like having your own special parking spot. n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah. We're born on the plank only to be marched off it.
Treacherous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I have a blindfold collection for these festive ocassions,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. He can stop enforcement, and he probably will, but that's not the same as repealing it.
The best he could do is issue a stop-loss order for the duration of time we continue to call up reserves. Once that time expires, he won't be able to issue such stop loss orders. That wouldn't allow anyone to be open.

The Republicans are probably laughing their ass off because they can get people like you to believe that this is Obama's fault. Which means they get their preferred policy, AND people pissed off at Obama, all at once. It's an awesome deal for them, though it's a shame you fall for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. If the policy was not enforced for FOUR years, it could never be re-instituted.
It would be like trying to put the Berlin Wall back.

But, Obama has 25 days to keep his word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. It's not Obama's problem that you don't understand that the Presiden't isn't a dictator. It's yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
50. What makes you believe that President Obama will stop enforcing this particular law?
Has he done or said anything to make you believe this? Or are you simply projecting your beliefs onto him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Delete. nt
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 11:34 PM by Cant trust em
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonePirate Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. The only thing Obama will do for his LGBT supporters is offer them more lies and broken promises.
I wish someone would call him out on his betrayal and bigotry. He has done very little to get DADT repealed and he continues to defend it in court. He has been silent on ENDA. He opposes marraige equality. The Republicans are honest and up front about not supporting LGBT issues. Obama has done little but stab the LGBT community in the back, smiling all the while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Unrecced for making a false statement
"Barack Obama promised HE would end DADT this year."

He never said such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. No, HE is fabulous.
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yes he did.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. "Unrecced for making a false statement"
You get to know who our allies are at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Oh, yeah.
Don't we ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. When and where did he say HE will end DADT by the end of the year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. I guess it depends on your definition of "HE".
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2010/feb/02/dont-ask-dont-tell-promise-now-rated-works/


In his State of the Union address on Jan. 27, 2010, Obama said, "This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are."

Six days later, Obama's top Pentagon officials offered the Senate Armed Services Committee details on how Obama's pledge will be carried out.

“The question before us is not whether the military prepares to make this change, but how we best prepare for it,” said Gates. “We have received our orders from the commander in chief and we are moving out accordingly."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I think it's also on "the list"
You know that one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Why certainly. The one they forgot to mention the lesbians who got to Easter Egg roll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. Oh yes, there it is, #23
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 12:14 AM by Starry Messenger
23. Recommitted, in a televised address, to passing ENDA . . . repealing Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell . . . repealing the so-called Defense of Marriage Act

LOL Okay that one deserves a laugh out loud. Now it's an accomplishment when the President reiterates a promise he hasn't kept, and has made no moves whatsoever towards keeping. Words. Why doesn't he just reiterate the promise 30 more times, then this list could be twice as big!



I expect several long treatises on what "working with" and "recommitting" actually mean in politician speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Exactly.
Gates began letting the steam out of the sack of shit today. He'd never had said that on his own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. Agreed totally DZ.
This whole thing reeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #15
27. Compare what President Obama actually said to what the OP claims he said.
What the OP claims he said:
"Barack Obama promised HE would end DADT this year."

What President Obama actually said in the SOTU speech:
"This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are."

The House, as I understand it, has repealed DADT and the Sec. of Defense and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff have testified before the Senate in favor of repeal but it's being held up by Senator McCain and some other Republicans. Hell, even Senator Lieberman has called for the Senate to stay in session thru X-Mas if need be to pass the repeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #27
34. The courts ruled DADT unconstitutional
The Obama DOJ appealed and got it re-upheld.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. One court ruled that way.
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 01:35 AM by Kaleva
Last year, a federal appeals court in Boston upheld DADT by dismissing a lawsuit challenging the law and the Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of that ruling. Maybe some legal beagle here at DU can tell us which courts ruling trumps the other.

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/08/scotus-dadt/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #38
48. There were several threads on the more recent court ruling.
I'm sure you could search for the links. It was very clear that the DOJ did not need to appeal the recent federal court ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
37. Psst...
"I will end Don't Ask, Don't Tell. That's my commitment to you." http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-human-rights-campaign-dinner">President Obama at a HRC dinner.

Just FYI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. He doesn't say in your link..
that he'll end it by the end of 2010 which the OP claims he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. You might try synthesizing information.
He says in January that DADT will be repealed by the end of the year. He then says in October that he'll end DADT.

If he says that he's going to do something he already promised would happen by a certain date, what does that tell you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. That was Oct. of 2009 and he doesn't give a specific deadline in that speech.
In the SOTU speech, he says:

"This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are."

He is true to his word and has been and is now working with Congress and the military to finally repeal DADT. But he doesn't say it will be done this year. Maybe it will and maybe it won't happen till next year or the year after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Do you do yoga?
The amount you're stretching to claim that Obama never said anything about repealing DADT this year is impressive.

He said that he would get rid of DADT, he said that he'd be working on it this year, he said that he had a plan to get rid of it during the current lame duck session.

Do I have to spell it out for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Your second sentence doesn't jive with your first sentence.
Your second sentence:

"He said that he would get rid of DADT, he said that he'd be working on it this year, he said that he had a plan to get rid of it during the current lame duck session."

In his speech given in Oct. of 2009, he said he'll get rid of DADT but doesn't give a timeline. In his SOTU speech earlier this year, he stated he'll work with with Congress and the military this year to finally end DADT. He has been doing that. As for what could be done during the lame duck sesssion, here is what he said early in November:

“I will expect that Secretary of Defense Gates and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mullen will have something to say about that review. I will look at it very carefully. But that will give us time to act in – potentially during the lame duck session – to change this policy."

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-looks-lame-duck-session-push-throu

Note the key phrase "potentially during the lame duck session ”.

While he is saying that there is a possibility that the Senate will pass a measure to repeal DADT while it's in the lame duck session, that leaves open the possibility that it won't.

President Obama has done more to advance to cause of gays being able to serve openly in the military then any other politician you may care to name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. It was Gates' fucking "survey" that delayed this until December, so spare the Crocodile tears, Rob.
Asspickle.

Pardon my French.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Don't Ask, Don't Tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #16
35. Okay, where was the "graphic" warning on that pic?
I need a new keyboard because my spaghetti squash vomit won't come out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. STOP IT PT !!!
ASSPICKLE? YOU'RE KILLING ME! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Hey you!
Personal attack! Moderators!!
:rofl:

XOXOXO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Where on earth did you come up with asspickle?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. gawd, what a fucking baby
tells me all I need to know about, you know, them :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. Sir Turtle McConnell spoke months ago. The admin is just confirming.
Donnie McClurkin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
True_Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. They should have at least thrown in DADT
into the "compromise" for the greedy 2%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Volaris Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
28. OK I've been reading through this thread...
and been thinking about the extent of the powers of an Executive Order....
I have always been under the impression that an E.O. CANNOT change an existing law, only modify (usually lessen) the impact of that law.
It may not be within the purview of the CiC to do away with DADT, but easing the punishment for the violation of said statute certainly is...say to just a fine or 24 hours incarceration in expectation of Congress actually doing its job and getting it repealed. Something like this would be a demonstration to the GBLT community that he does in fact give a damn about them, put the onus back on Congress to act like a functional branch of government, and act as a show of force to not only the base but to those who would doubt his position and influence as head of the Military Forces of this nation...
If I am mis-informed as to the nature or extent of an Executive Order, please enlighten me=)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
30. I'm going to suggest that these very public statements
were actually private signals related to the tax cut negotiations. To put it another way, McConnell's statements on Meet the Press could be seen as an offer on DADT in the private negotiations. Gates provided the counterstatement, essentially responding to McConnell through the vehicle of his speech. Obviously, the White House signed off on his comments. So, it goes something like this:

McConnell (Public): We probably won't get to DADT this year
Private Negotiation Translation: We can put DADT on the table for X, or we can take it off. Your call.

Gates (Public): DADT may be around for a while longer.
Private Translation: DADT isn't that important to us. We're going to hold out on the current offer.

If we think of it in a haggling or horsetrading sense, think of a car dealer (McConnell) saying "We'll throw in the mats for $350," and the buyer (Gates on behalf of the admin) saying "Meh. That seems like a lot." That is, exactly what you should do in negotiations.

In any case, I'm gonna go ahead and bookmark this thread. I think it will be tricky, but we may yet see DADT come up through the DAB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
33. Don't hold your breath my friend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #33
42. We will know everything on DADT within days now.
We'll see. If it happens, it will be because of Joe Lieberman, not Barack Obama...and that's really sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
39. Come on David;
You're already treading water and those are fins circling around you...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
40. We already know the answer to that question based upon past history.
Don't hold your breath my friend. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
43. To Mischelle Obama, "Change we could believe in"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. We believe in it, we just can't get there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
45. Why wouldn't they be?
This Admin has shown it has zero interest in ending DADT. Zero. Why would that change now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
52. Unfortunately I wouldn't hold my breath on this one. I don't think he is going to help you
out with this. I'd love to be proven wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC