|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:00 AM Original message |
Will We Ever See 5% Unemployment Again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
1. not until we get a president who works for WE THE PEOPLE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Write Left (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
2. Yeah, but first they have to get the wages down far enough to compensate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wounded Bear (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
3. Maybe if you're under 40.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
4. Now that we have extended the tax cuts for the rich I'm sure they'll pump out a shitload more jobs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:10 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Exactly! Just like the 4.5 million jobs created under *. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
5. sure; the government will redefine unemployment until the numbers look good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raschel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
7. According to the Bernanke interview," between the peak and the end of last year we lost 8 &1/2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:34 AM Response to Original message |
8. If we do it will be a long time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pansypoo53219 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
9. when we go back to clinton tax rates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
10. Our corporate gods prefer built in unemployment. It is leverage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:35 AM Response to Original message |
11. maybe in ten years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:37 AM Response to Original message |
12. I agree, possibly in 8-10 years... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
13. In 20 years, at this pace of job creation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
14. Not unless the government makes it happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
15. The Imperial Govt of the United States doesn't do bodycounts, keep figures on collateral damage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:50 AM Response to Original message |
16. Here's your answer: Nobody on Wall Street gives a shit. They own Congress. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:51 AM Response to Original message |
17. welkl don't forget this "New World Order" thing is already in play... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:08 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC