Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Howard Dean: "You can't deal with the deficit and give tax cuts to those who make a million a year"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:50 PM
Original message
Howard Dean: "You can't deal with the deficit and give tax cuts to those who make a million a year"
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 02:23 PM by Amerigo Vespucci
Tax Cut Deal: Dean, Ex-Obama Advisers Lament President's Plan
First Posted: 12- 7-10 11:26 AM | Updated: 12- 7-10 11:35 AM



"We clearly have to deal with the deficit; it is probably the biggest problem facing the country," said former DNC header Howard Dean. "But you can't deal with the deficit from a political point of view if you say to Democrats, we are going to cut Social Security and Medicare and, by the way, give tax cuts to those who make a million dollars a year."

Antipathy, however, was saved as much for the process of securing the final tax cut package as for the substance of the package itself. Suggesting that the deal could die in the House, Dean echoed a question other Democrats offered in the hours after Obama's announcement: Was enough secured in return?

"I'm not so sure you can get the House to agree to this in conference committee," he said. "And what about the president's other priorities: Don't Ask Don't Tell, START, DREAM Act? I mean, do we not get anything for the $700 billion?"

Certainly, Democrats got something, perhaps even more than expected. Discussing the arrangement with the Huffington Post, senior administration officials stressed that even the labor federation "AFL-CIO did not think...we could keep" the 13 months of unemployment insurance. The actual cost of the provisions that the White House secured, meanwhile, was pricier than the cost of extending the Bush tax cuts for the rich -- $215 billion (including UI) versus $95 billion, all over two years.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/07/tax-cut-deal-lament_n_793105.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. No shit, Sherlock. So tell me somethin' I don't already know. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Your headline is incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Your headline appears to be a misquote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. run, Dr. Dean. run. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I disagree with him that the deficit is the biggest problem in the country right now.
I'd argue that chronic unemployment is the biggest problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's not Dean's quote. Also
Dean quoted an inaccurate number: $700 billion.

<...>

Certainly, Democrats got something, perhaps even more than expected. Discussing the arrangement with the Huffington Post, senior administration officials stressed that even the labor federation "AFL-CIO did not think...we could keep" the 13 months of unemployment insurance. The actual cost of the provisions that the White House secured, meanwhile, was pricier than the cost of extending the Bush tax cuts for the rich -- $215 billion (including UI) versus $95 billion, all over two years.

<...>


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Fix headline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Dean doesnt say that anywhere in that article
Yay for another bullshit headline.

I notice you didnt qoute this part.



The actual cost of the provisions that the White House secured, meanwhile, was pricier than the cost of extending the Bush tax cuts for the rich -- $215 billion (including UI) versus $95 billion, all over two years.


So Obama won way more than he gave up but that doesnt quite fit the meme does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmiami Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Dean
DUH!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. If the deputy national director of Obama's presidential campaign thinks
this was a mistake.....not good news...at all. The President is disappointing even those who helped manage his campaign.

I cannot understand why, in the midst of a big debate about the viability of Social Security and discussions of cuts to those
receiving SS.....the SS deductions are being reduced for a year???????????????????????????? WTF hardly begins to describe my wonderment.
If anything, the cap on Social Security income should have been raised!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. does dean have a twitter or facebook account - is there a du group 4 dean n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Yes....DFA Group n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. that is not a personal twitter or facebook account that is a group
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Are you just refusing to change your headline, or what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Welcome to my ignore list.
No I'm not refusing. I changed it. I just don't jump when you snap your fingers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. backatcha
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 02:32 PM by TwilightGardener
And edit to add: you completely concocted the fake headline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC