Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The PO was much more than just "a provision that [the left] didn't get"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
hulka38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:05 PM
Original message
The PO was much more than just "a provision that [the left] didn't get"
in the health care debate.

Here's the relevant Obama quote from today:

"So this notion that somehow we are willing to compromise too much reminds me of the debate that we had during health care. This is the public option debate all over again. So I pass a signature piece of legislation where we finally get health care for all Americans, something that Democrats had been fighting for, for a hundred years - but because there was a provision in there that they didn't get, that would have affected maybe a couple million people, even though we got health insurance for 30 million people, and the potential for lower premiums for a hundred million people, that somehow that was a sign of weakness and compromise."


The PO is the key to breaking the monopoly that private insurers hold in order to bring costs down. He campaigned and won a lot of votes making that very case. The insurance companies certainly made it clear to the President that the PO meant more to them than just "a provision". The PO is not the small, petty provision that he portrayed it as today and he and everyone else, especially the people eating with gold-plated silverware, knows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good post. Sometimes the prez seems interested in checking things off a list...
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 05:07 PM by polichick
...not in good policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. .....RIGHT! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's a fundamental dishonesty in those words.
He knows what the Public Option would have meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. 'fundamental dishonesty' = Yes. And the nerve of him to lie and expect us to believe this shit.
He is a LIAR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. The lack of PO, when coulped with the mandate, means a Big Win for the insurance cos
and a Big Lose for the US citizen.

He didn't bother to mention that in his critique.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah those lower premiums are really helping
as soon as I find a single person who is paying less than they were before the HCR bill was signed I'll let Obama know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe it's because all indications point to him making a deal with ins. companies to drop it.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. "The bill I sign MUST include the public option" - Obama
Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. No the PO was the essential critical element needed and that YOU CAMPAIGNED ON
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. There's the rub that makes today's display of anger and minimizing just so bad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. After all, it WAS...
only a NOTION. :shrug:

And would someone please fill me in about when and where this DEBATE took place??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. it's something that the American people didn't get: they were 60-70% for it, & it would benefit them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. on second thought, you can't be a centrist without claiming you're "for the people"
and the "extremists" are only petulant weirdos with unpopular pet issues

funny thing is, Jeffery Paige found the exact same thinking among the Salvadoran and Nicaraguan elite and bourgeoisie: that was the thinking that led them to knowingly cheer death squads and the deaths of innocents--because the FMLN and Sandinistas were harming Progress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. Exaggerate the "victories", dismiss the losses, and insult us for noticing.
I'm waiting for the announcement that he's changing parties. Because we're all just so mean to him.
:kick: & R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. The PO would have affected everyone, it would have forced the
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 05:44 PM by alsame
insurance companies to lower premium costs in order to compete. Those with private insurance would also have indirectly benefited from a PO.

Which is, of course, why it had to be killed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCheese Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. "So I pass a signature piece of legislation..."
Now I'm confused. I thought Congress passed things? That's why everything that happens or doesn't happen is Congress' fault?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. Precisely
well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. Of everything he said today, this is the one that really, really hurt.
I could really use a public option, but instead I've got a high risk pool I can't afford to get into. I should just shut up about it because the people who actually make the policies don't get it. They've got a good life and the rest of us are supposed to be grateful for what trickles down. What's that smell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. The high risk pool lasts only until 2014. You should evaluate your options in 2014 before you decide
that what passed won't help you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #18
28. a. I need medical care now. b. I'm ecstatic that I'll be eligible for Medicare in 2014.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulka38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. As was mentioned above, the PO would have
effected everyone, not just a few million people. I heard it on my car radio and his distortion of the PO debate to take another shot at lefties stood out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. Ruling out the PO in secret negotiations, coupled with ...
Ruling out the PO in secret negotiations, coupled with endorsing a mandate that he had opposed in the primary campaign were the two knives in the back that drove me away from Obama.

Those were the key betrayals, as far as I am concerned.

How dare the President trivialize the left's concerns on this issue? Who does he think he's talking to? He should focus on trivializing the Republicans' concerns. Instead, he says they have "some good ideas."

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiffenPoof Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
21. Excellent Post!
Youa re absolutely correct. The PO was no small provision...it was an essential part of Health Care.

-PLA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulka38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. He seems to be playing dumb on something that he
effectively and eloquently lectured on and advocated for not so long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
23. you are absolutely spot-on
it was the key to keeping insurance companines from running rampant when we found out that "reform" was going to include mandates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovelyrita Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
26. He should be ashamed.
Aren't people dying in Arizona because they can't afford to pay for organ transplants? That doesn't seem like all Americans have health care to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emsimon33 Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
27. Obama is a weak, ball-less embarrassment!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
29. kick for this great point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
30. That's a straight up lie. Obama know's how important it was and know's
we know how important it was.

He also didn't get Health Care for anyone. They got more Health Insurance for people but Health Insurance is not equal to Health Care.

He isn't talking to us, he is talking to Republican's. No Dem's will buy that spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. "New" Dems will.
But you're correct, he's talking to Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Of course he is lying, but he bashed 'the left' and scolded us in public.
This isn't the first time either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
32. Spot on post. Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
34. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
35. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC