|
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 07:54 PM by RandomThoughts
I would guess he is progressive left, because the media painted him as center right. And he might have spoken in interviews more center to get center votes.
See how ridiculous it all becomes, which is the intent, to keep people from being able to organize, when actually the right and left are in reality pretty close together if issues are actually explained, and the corporate center is the fringe.
Most of the imagery I have seen about him are from various news outlets, who knows what he thinks from them, but I know they try to create an image. There was an intentional attempt to spite the liberals after health care debate by imagery. And some quotes. But was that him, or out of perspective news? :shrug:
I like the guy, figure he is probably pretty good, I would say I don't, or do disagree with him on things, but how would I know what he thinks. Although in conversation on topics, sometimes it is possible to say, what you think about Rahm when you mean a topic. Or possible to say what you think about, the story said to be said by Rahm, when you mean a topic. Or possible to say what you think about, the imagery and presentation, of a story, said to be said by Rahm, when you mean a topic. Or possible to say what you think about, the perspective, of an imagery and presentation, of a story, said to be said by Rahm, when you mean a topic.
That is a basic concept of information control.
First PR will tell you scripted things to get you to think a certain way, then also they will go with massive noise so people don't have any source to be sure of.
If they can't dazzle you with brilliance, baffle you with BS.
That is most of the stuff, they don't have to tell you what is happening if they can tell you anything that will keep you occupied.
Much of the news is to keep people from thinking on things.
So I listen to music mostly.
|