Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Baseless" Way to go Rachel!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:16 PM
Original message
"Baseless" Way to go Rachel!
That was a perfect heading for her discussion on the tax cuts for the millionaires.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. She is kicking ass!
Thank you, Rachel, for pointing out that the GOP is just as scared of cutting the child tax credit as Dems are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Love the double meaning in that - she isn't missing a beat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. She has a way of breaking it down.
Kieth will get you angry, Rachel gets you understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wonder if Rachel cares more about really helping people or
winning a political fight. Does she even know any unemployed people? If she is so outraged at getting a tax cut, I can give her the names & addresses of people who could use that money so she can send them a check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Way to miss her point, James. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Her point seems that she rather win a political fight
than help real people who are hurting in this economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. No, her point is that it was a false choice to begin with. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. It wasn't a false choice.
She is not dealing with reality. O'Donnell's show at 10 PM showed that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. No it didn't.
Rachel rightly noted that the supposed GOP 'concessions' for middle class tax cuts were for things that they favor and were worried about losing, i.e. the Child Tax Credit. Why was Obama so willing to cave on Republican demands when all we got in return was stuff they wanted to maintain anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. You think they wanted to maintain the unemployment extention or
the earned income tax credit? The problem was that they were willing to let the child tax credit and the Bush tax cut on the middle class expire and wait for the GOP to take control of the House in January. Maddow seemed ignorrant of that fact.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. They have plenty of unemployed people, and parents, in their own districts.
Furthermore, the EITC is a Republican idea. It's a subsidy to low wage employers. They like tuition tax credits too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Yeah there are and they're Democrats so the GOP doesn't care
about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Sure, that's why preserving the Child Tax Credit is a plank in their Pledge To America
And the EITC benefits them, because it transfers wealth from taxpayers to the plutocrats.

They lost nothing from this deal. It's why they're celebrating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. So because they are for it
We should be against it? Forget that it helps people. Nice logic. And they say conservatives are cold hearted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. You sound just like my Father-In-Law. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. must be a wise man nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. He's a racist, Fox news watching, Limbaugh loving tea bagger. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. So are you calling me a racist too?
What exactly did I say to make you draw that conclusion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
33. No. I was saying that your commentresembled a comment he might make.
You said he sounded wise and I wanted to point that I didn't think he was wise and why I thought that. I wasn't attempting to make any inferences beyond that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Sounded like you were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Well obviously, based on your original comment, I was lumping you in with my F-I-L but
I wasn't specifically calling you a racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. But is is interesting that is the first place you went. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. I think you're making incorrect assumptions about a person
you don't know, and it has little to nothing to do with the arguments she is making against the proposed "compromise."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Well since she hardly mentioned the unemployment extention
my guess is she doesn't know any unemployed people who need it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Your guess?
She lives in NYC, there are unemployed people EVERYWHERE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. That doesn't mean she knows any. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #26
34. You are so off base
Edited on Wed Dec-08-10 11:22 AM by Dappleganger
you're not even trying. You don't even know the woman or her background, yet you are "ASSuming" you think she doesn't know or is even friends with any unemployed people.

Here's a challenge to you: write her and ask, then report back here what she says. I dare you to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #34
41. Anyone who has working class friends that are suffering right now
wouldn't be as callous as she was, ready to bargain away their benefits and money to win a political victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #34
44. BTW Send me her address and I will write her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emcguffie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
40. I"m on disability and my husband is unemployed.
We are not making it in any way, shape or form. We don't have enough money to eat, and unless something changes, we will end up on the street eventually.

I am against this tax deal. Saving a few dollars for middle class taxpayers -- those who are still employed, by the way -- does not in my book match up to the crime of giving all that money back to the richest folks in the country and increasing the debt/deficit out the wazoo. I don't have as good a grasp of all the details that many folks here do have, but it is just wrong.

And I am so tired of watching us give in and give in and give in. If Republicans can get their way when they're in the minority, as they have often done, why can't we get our way when we're in the majority?

Something stinks. Just my opinion. All the same, it is a hungry opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. So you're saying that other people's children should go hungry
to stand up for your principles. If you don't want your tax cut, I know several working families that you can send the money to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. She's demolishing the notion that this is a good deal
The tax credits Obama cited today as significant Republican concessions were either things they favored already (the child tax credit) or items that were put into the stimulus package to attract their support in the first place (EITC and tuition tax credits).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. I was informed here today that we liberals aren't the base.
:eyes: I guess the 'base' is the squishy middle who can capriciously vote for either party. War is Peace and all of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I am a moderate democrat that would NEVER vote for a republican.
I tried voting for a republican once soon after I turned 18. One of the biggest mistakes I have made in a life of mostly good choices. But I am a moderate. It bothers me that Obama is savaged on the DU while a questionable character like Julian Assange is lionized. Where has a sense of perspective gone? Don't get me wrong, I would like to see Obama show some spine, other than that he displays in abundance when lecturing democrats for being disappointed in his constant backing up. I don't have a dog in the fight on tax cuts, I could care less one way or another. What I do have an interest in is our President standing up and being clear that when faced with literal blackmail, he will go back on a campaign promise backing away from the campaign promise if the only sane choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. I appreciate what you said
although we don't share the same viewpoint, it does seem as if you're trying to look at it from all sides. What bothers me most is that the republicans have given in to the unemployment extensions on multiple occasions and it doesn't even seem as if he *tried* to get what they wanted. From what was reported tonight on Rachel, Keith and Lawrence O'Donnel's shows is that there was essentially a deal made with the president and the republicans, but not the democratic politicians present. I don't agree with that kind of deal-making and think that the ones who are angry are justified in wanting to stop the bill. I pretty much feel like the day TARP was passed to bail the banks. Completely demoralized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
38. One of the most Basic Core Principles of the Democratic Party
is Progressive Taxation.. You say you are a Democrat yet have no dog in the fight..Something seems amiss to me.. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. That person who told you that could very well be right.... I don't think the President considers us
to be his base either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. GREAT explanation of the "compromise!
YYYYAAAAHHHHHH Rachel! :applause: :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. First you win. Then they fight you. Then they laugh at you. Then they ignore you.
Rachel, I think you've given me serious consideration for a new sig-line!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. That's Exactly Correct (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiranon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
30. Rachel has it right. Obama is giving away the store for almost nothing in return.
This is the most incredibly inept negotiation by an administration and give away that I have seen in all my days. Obama should have let the tax cuts expire or used the threat of it to get not just a better deal but to get a deal period. He got nothing. The debt will be greatly increased with very little stimulus to the economy. Where are the tea partiers who ranted and raved against more debt creation? I do not understand this deal and why Obama thinks he got a good deal. It looks like an incredible giveaway to me and a total loss for the Democrats if they go along with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. His vast experience in governing from the executive is really
showing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
31. Rachel was rockin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
42. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC