Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I REFUSE to believe that there wasn't a way to:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:48 PM
Original message
I REFUSE to believe that there wasn't a way to:
1) let the tax cuts expire on every cent over $250,000
2) extend the tax cuts permanently for every cent below $250,000
3) extend UI benefits, including the addition of a Tier 5, indefinitely until unemployment levels are below a specific level
4) repeal DADT, just for good measure

Where there's a will, there's a way. I am certain it could have been done. How am I so certain? Because I KNOW that if this had been Bush's agenda when he was prez, even during a period when the "opposition" party held Congress, it would have gotten done exactly as he wanted. That's how I know that it was possible.

That it wasn't done means there was not the will to do so. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think we could have accomplished any of those four things
Unless we were willing to compromise our principles. And we only get point #3.

We should have just let the tax cuts expire. It's time to start paying the bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes. All things happen in Washington due to political will.
But political will doesn't just grow on trees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhpgetsit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. I get your point but
I don't think it was possible.

But the way I see it, we are in a fight, and we have to deliver a blow, and we can't be afraid of taking a couple of shots. I hope there are 40 senators willing to block this deal. Yes, UI benefits will expire for millions if that happens, and we will all be paying higher taxes. But it is going to be up to the GOP to turn the economy around in the next 2 years. They will have the purse and all the responsibility that comes with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well because....
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 09:59 PM by Tx4obama
In order to do #2 and #3 we have to have 60 senate 'yes' votes, which we do NOT have.

AND

Regarding #4 - the repeal is in the defense bill which might be voted on as early as Friday.
Excerpt:
A vote on the DREAM Act is still scheduled for Wednesday and Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) said he was "hopeful" Reid would file cloture on the defense bill the same day, meaning a vote could come as early as Friday. "We've got the time," said Levin. "Just take it."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/07/senate-gop-leaders-not-re_n_793394.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Then how did Bush do it? Did he have 60 votes to do the tax cuts?
Or did he find another way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. There were Democrats that worked with Bush. There are Democrats
who refuse to vote with Obama. How does one get around this political reality?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. You are wrong. Bush got it passed with 51 votes...Cheney was the tiebreaker.
The sixty vote thing is nonsense. It is merely a rule, not law, and could be overturned tomorrow if Harry Reid wanted it to happen. Apparently the Dems are happy hiding behind this smokescreen in order to: a) give themselves political cover, and; b) give themselves evil, obstructionist bogeymen to run against. As if that ever worked for them. I, like most of us, wish I knew the real reason, why they keep up this sixty vote charade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I'd like to see the 60 vote rule go away, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. They passed it with 50
votes plus Cheney in reconciliation. Where there is a will there is a way. They got the will dems don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bush was a dictator with a rubber stamp congress.
That's the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. "where there's a will there's a way!"
Helluva strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. If you refuse then what's the point of discussion? That's religion, not reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. I refused to believe GWBush would actually be inaugurated, - I honestly
believed that we'd prevail.

I refused to believe that we'd actually wage pre-emptive war against Iraq.

I refused to believe Bush could possibly win a second term.

Reality bites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. How is it Obama's problem that you misunderstand reality?
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 10:02 PM by BzaDem
I mean, sure, you have every right to be "sure" of something that's false, but I don't see why your misunderstanding of reality is Obama's problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. That's just silly.
You can refuse to believe the sun will come up, but that won't stop day from breaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC