Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another billionaire bailout is felonious....but the assault on SS is a crime against humanity!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:27 PM
Original message
Another billionaire bailout is felonious....but the assault on SS is a crime against humanity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure we can compromise on social security.
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 11:30 PM by provis99
We can raise the retirement age, privatise it, raise the payroll tax to offset tax breaks to billionaires, cut benefits, cut eligible beneficiaries, and other wonderful compromises. Compromise is what Democrats do best!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hyperbole and fear tactics....
just like Republicans.

Congrats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Always.
It's amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. This "deal" was a "two-fer" for regressives, and a "Lose/Lose" for progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. What assault? There is no change in SS funding.
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 11:46 PM by Statistical
Notice the deficit cost of the 2% payroll tax reduction is $120B?

How would not paying 2% in SS trust fund cost the deficit $120B? Think about it. Here is a hint: The defict is the amount required to balance the general fund (i.e the budget).

Thats right the legislation calls for the general fund to replace the funding not contributed by payroll taxes.

Thus:
2% SS tax holiday - $120B in SS funding for 2011 + $120B funding from general fund (paid for by an expansion of deficit by $120B) = $0 change in SS funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. i`m drawing my money from the time america still had an industrial base
my kids will be drawing social security from an america that has tens of millions of unemployed or under employed. how will their socials security be funded?

it won`t be funded by an industrial base....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is true
Because once enacted, it will be impossible to return to previous withholdings. Every time the reduction is about to expire, Republicans will begin their ersatz populism about how the Democrats are trying to raise everyone's taxes! Naturally, the media echo chamber will amplify the bullshit, and all the usual suspects will wring their hands about how mean the Democrats are.

Then the new trustee's report will come out, and *horrors*! if the system's projected solvency is reduced by five years or so. This will lead to the nice-sounding solution of "means testing" social security, reducing or eliminating benefits for the wealthy as a means of "saving" social security for those who "truly need it." Following that, social security will become identified as a poor person's pension, instead of the universal insurance program it is meant to be. And as we've seen with tiresome regularity, anything for the poor is the first thing to face more cuts.

This "holiday" will be the next step on the way to ending social security. Remember the Republicans' silence as the holiday is proposed, and compare it to the fake populist tone they will adopt when it's scheduled to end. That will be your "tell."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. k&r and thank you so much for your posts on SS, I really appreciate them

(and I'm sure I'm not alone).

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC