Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some unemployed jobseekers trying to double dip

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:34 AM
Original message
Some unemployed jobseekers trying to double dip
Some unemployed jobseekers trying to double dip

DENVER - He's got jobs to fill, yet one local employer says many applicants will only take the work if the pay is in cash. That cash, he says, would be paid under the table so the worker can continue to collect unemployment benefits.

A few local industrial companies are starting to see more potential employees trying to cheat the system.

Ed Sleeman, owner of Colorado Drywall Supply, posted two new jobs eight months ago.

Dozens of applications later, Sleeman still can't find two qualified truck drivers willing to load and unload building supplies, despite Colorado's 8.4 percent unemployment rate.

http://www.9news.com/news/article.aspx?storyid=168698&catid=339
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. "trying to cheat the system" -- wonder where they got that idea. rot starts at the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. The (possible) source of the idea is not a justification. nt
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 07:41 AM by Obamanaut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. tough titty. can't expect the peons to behave well when the whole fucking Establishment is stealing
the silver and bedsheets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Well, that says everything I need to know about your apparent lack of morals. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. lol. nothing to do with "morals". morals are for societies with a social contract.
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 08:07 AM by Hannah Bell
the law of the jungle rules where there is none, & you can blame the rulers for creating that.

when the rulers are corrupt, the people will be too. in self-defense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Exactly. Look at what happened in areas of famine.
The only rule is to survive and you do what you have to at that point.

My mother tells me about what it was like in the last winter of the war in Vienna. The basic food allotment was 2 kilos of potatoes a week and you were lucky to get half that. There was no coal for heating or cooking so you crawled into bombed out buildings for scraps of lumber to burn. You scrounged, hustled or did whatever you had to to survive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. So because Madoff stole billions, it's OK for you and me to steal whatever we can from taxpayers.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Is stealing because you have mouths to feed the moral equivalent
of stealing so that yo can live the lifestyle of the rich and famous?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
47. nothing to do with whether "it's ok" per some official or private morality.
it *will be*

because the rulers are creating those conditions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #14
32. Exactly.
Still some won't understand that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
35. because they could never think of such a thing themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #35
48. they could certainly think of it. but in a society perceived as mostly just, most didn't try to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
45. Cheating the system IS the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. I Know You Didn't Intend It To Be But That's A Republican Oriented Criticism Of The System
I doubt there are as many double dippers as they think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. I just find it funny that this is actually news
I sure as hell won't blame someone double dipping :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
41. It really reminds me of Reagan's anecdotal references to "welfare queens"
in Cadillacs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Another variation of "welfare queen"-the unemployed don't WANT to work.
There will always be someone who tries to game the system but the overwhelming majority do not.

Maybe he can't hire anyone because he doesn't want to pay enough.

I've seen that happen before, they want all these qualifications and think that if you're desperate enough, you will work for barely over minimum wage. Something tells me this guy isn't someone I'd want to work for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Or because it's "temp" work
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichellesBFF Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
37. Or because it's part-time with no benefits!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. bingo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. OMG! Employers are so victimized!
Everything would be just peachy keen if it weren't for those unemployed. Dammitt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. From The Article "Dozens of applications later,"
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. "They say" and "I've heard". . . . typical BS
I've heard there are headless drug runners invading southern Arizona but I don't believe it.

The article says $10 and $15 an hour with benefits, but it doesn't say what the rest of the conditions are. How many hours a week? How steady is the work? If it's loading and unloading construction materials, what's the expectation of continued work? What are the conditions?


I call bullshit on this.


TG, TT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #17
33. Yeah the story stinks
It is probably more like minimum wage, 60 hours a week, no benes.
And the REASON I assume this is because IF there were benefits...people would work just for that.
This guy is probably a republican spinmeister.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
43. No taxpayers are being victimized.
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 10:54 AM by Statistical
Someone working, requesting to be paid in cash, and continuing to collect unemployment is defrauding the govt and thus taxpayers.

A crooked employer would gladly take that deal. It saves them about 15% when you consider the workmans comp, unemployment insurance, and FICA they aren't paying.

An honest employer and taxpayers are the only ones who suffer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. Two employers and couple people applying.
Wow it's out of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. Thanks for propagating 'welfare queen' bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. Well, if the employers would pay a
LIVING WAGE perhaps people would not be trying to "double dip" as the article contends. You're making $600.00 a month on unemployment and you have a chance to make another $300.00 under the table? I say go for it. And if anybody gets their panties in wad, point them in the direction of the Banksters who stole TRILLIONS WITH THIS PRESEDENT'S MOTHER FUCKING BLESSING!

This is a hit piece to target the unemployed and satisfy the conservative agenda. It's the meme they'll use to throw the 99 weekers under the bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
15. Unrec for spreading repuke memes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
16. Unemployment rate went up again so time to blame those lazy
shiftless people! They are making President Obama look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
19. It's the American Way
Screw or be screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
23. I don't know how common this is now, but...
I remember many, many years ago standing on an interminable unemployment line thinking "Shit, I have to get back to work."

It's easier now that you just call it in.

I also remember collecting UE and turning down on the books jobs because it meant I had to show up at a shit job I hated for 40 hours for 50 bucks more a week. I'll take the shit job when the dole runs out.

I haven't collected UE for over 20 years, but these attitudes were fairly common back then, and there was even one employer who worked with you to put you off the books in the slow season so you could collect. Can't say I was proud of it, but you hadda pay the rent.

Republican memes? Yeah, sure-- I doubt much has changed. The difference is that they object to UE in principle, while the truth is that it is a necessary adjunct to modern civilization.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. i did the same thing and...
i bet there were a lot of republicans in those lines! of course that`s when there were jobs in the usa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
24. sounds like bullshit but....
in illinois one can draw unemployment and still work part time. one can make up to 50% of the unemployment amount with out being penalized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badtoworse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
26. We're screaming that truly unemployed people need help...
and some here are condoning what amounts to fraud? That is a very poor reflection on those who approve and does not help our cause at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. "Welfare queen" type allegations do not prove fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badtoworse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Show me some proof of the alleged fraud.
there was none in that story and I doubt you can find it either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badtoworse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Reread my post - condoning fraud is wrong...
Whether it actually occurred is irrevelant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #31
49. no, some are making the point that when the rulers behave lawlessly,
the peasants will do the same in self-defense.

that's a scientific observation, not an apologetics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
28. Anecdotal crap
What's the point?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
34. And This Is New???
35 years ago I had a friend who was a construction worker who would work 8 months of the year "on the books"...then he was "fired" over the winter and would collect UE until the next construction season began. During his "dole time" (as he called it), he continued to work for cash only and probably made more money that way than he did when he was contracted. He did this for years...so this is new?

Surprise Surprise someone found a way to screw the system. Wanna bet there are many others who've found loopholes as well. In these days, can you blame 'em? We're all on our own and you take it where you can get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scruffy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
36. doesn't say what the job pays
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. Ding Ding Ding!!!
Nail meet hammer!

I bet he's not offering shit for the job and that's why they don't want to give up UI for it.

I remember a guy getting pissy with me when I was walking away from a lowball offer. He said "I can't find anybody who will do this job!!" I told him " I will, just not for that kind of money"

He sat there for a minute and shot back "I can't AFFORD to pay any more than that, what am I supposed to do?!!" I said "here's an idea,get off your ass and do it yourself then you cheap bastard!!" And with that I walked out. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. Also doesn't say how much unemployment is.
Can't meet basics on it in a lot of states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
39. Translation
"Sleeman still can't find two qualified truck drivers willing to load and unload building supplies"

translation

"Cheap bastard isn't offering shit or he'd have the jobs filled already" ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
42. i'm confused i thought there were no jobs. then there are jobs but
the companies won't hire people because they have no jobs, now there are jobs but people want jobs and unemployment insurance too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinkerbell41 Donating Member (722 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
44. Really?
In my view it's a win situation for the employer. He pays the employee cash, usually lower than regular pay, and the employer isn't paying into anything else either.
Say you are making 1600 a week while employed, on Unemployment it goes down to 300, the only jobs available are paying 10 an hour, after taxes you are back down to maybe 300 a week. You are still in the same situation. You have done nothing to improve it.
I'm not gonna starve, I don't expect anyone else to either. When you are talking about losing 1300 a week for 2+ years, what choices are there??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
46. If they were paying living wage this wouldn't be an issue.
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 12:03 PM by Edweird
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
50. I know somebody who did that, SHE'S A REPUBLICAN...
She was out of work like two weeks, but kept drawing unemployment. The government caught her. And then she got fired from her accounting job too.

Serves her ass right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
51. I hope they do cheat the system.
And I hope they win, and the system looses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC