Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Teabagger claims Palin and the GOP "hijacked" tea party

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 06:34 PM
Original message
Teabagger claims Palin and the GOP "hijacked" tea party

Quote of the Day: Has the Tea Party Movement Now Been “Hijacked” by Palin and the GOP

Posted by JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief in Politics.

Our political Quote of the Day comes from a must-read-in-full column by Nashville Post Politics’ Kleinheider on the Tea Party movement, Sarah Palin and the GOP. Here’s the first part of his piece:

The tea party movement is dead. The one I was familiar with anyway. Judson Phillips held it down and Sarah Palin drove a stake right through its heart live last night on C-Span in front of an unsuspecting audience.

Sarah Palin didn’t give a tea party speech last night. She gave a partisan Republican address. It was a purely political speech designed to position her for a presidential run in 2012 or 2016. Period. She wasn’t there to celebrate the organic nature of a movement she had nothing to do with creating. She was there to co-opt the name and claim the brand as hers. And she did.

The movement, that came to be officially recognized almost a year ago but whose roots go back further than that, has been snuffed out and replaced in the public mind. The movement that began as a people’s movement of angry independent, libertarians and conservatives will now be thought as the movement of people like Palin, Dick Armey, Judson Phillips, Mark Skoda, etc. Essentially, a wholly owned subsidiary of the “Official Conservative Movement” and the Republican Party.

This new tea party bears no resemblance to the one that began a year ago as a reaction to the collapse of our financial system and the subsequent bailout. That movement of ragtag and unorganized libertarians, independents and conservatives was something new and unique. An authentic protest movement angered not just by the new President, Barack Obama, who had presided over the bailouts but the president who started the ball rolling and whose incompetence had led to the crisis in the first place, George W. Bush.

AND:

For over a year the media has struggled to try and define just what exactly the movement was. Now they have a definition.

Sarah Palin.

AND:

The fact that Palin even has the temerity to position herself as a leader in the movement (and despite her protests that’s exactly what she was doing) is offensive to any student of very, very recent political history. Palin, as mavericky and rogue as she likes to paint herself, was the Vice-Presidential nominee of the Republican Party in 2010. She ran with John McCain and defended the Bush legacy. A project she continued last night in front of a faux-tea party audience.


Here's a better definition: lunatics




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Palin Highjacked the Tea Party
You Betcha

But...They invited her in.
She's been their standard bearer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. "The tea party movement is dead. "
I suppose that's not good news for some. Frankly, calling it a movement is a joke. A bunch of opportunist making money off a bunch of lunatics is far from a movement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I would argue this from a different perspective
This IS all about Palin.
The Tea Party-ers made her their standard bearer and she quickly made it about Sarah Palin. Much the same way she did the 2008 General Election.

All the missteps and failings are someone else's fault, because she is a star.
She has complained bitterly that the McCain camp didn't use her properly. That they tried to script her, instead of letting her do what she does best - be Sarah.
Yet, when they did, she made a complete ass out of herself:

Katie Couric: What magazines do you read?
Palin: All of them.

Then she complained that it was a gotcha question.
She made a similar fool out of herself with Glen Beck regarding her favorite founding father -- All of them.

She tried to closely tie herself to Glen Beck, by suggesting he could be her running mate. I'm sure in an attempt to gain a huge influence with his audience.

She is like a tick. She latches on, sucks the host dry and moves on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I was really talking about the organizers, but
you are exactly right about Palin.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. They not only invited her in
they paid her big for it. Didn't she make something like $120,000 for that speech?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. she tea-bagged the teabaggers.
Edited on Mon Feb-08-10 03:45 AM by Whisp
:O
I wonder if they know what the new definition of 'tea-bagging'is.
Doubt it, these people don't know 'squat'! heh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh boo hoo...the teabags, palin, and teabag wannabes
can all rot in their blithering ignorance.:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. They apparently don't realize that they're a wholly owned subsidiary of the GNOP
They've never been their own independent entity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peaches2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. They're too stupid to know
that they only have themselves to blame. Anyone with a brain knows she doesn't give a damn about them or "the cause" whatever that is. She's a narcissist and a pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatPoetGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is just BEAUTIFUL:
"any student of very, very recent political history. Palin, as mavericky and rogue as she likes to paint herself, was the Vice-Presidential nominee of the Republican Party in 2010."

"in 2010"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Uh oh - trouble in paradise.
Looks like a spat between the self anointed and the self deluded.

That sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think he's deluding himself about the origins of the teabaggers,
but I'll give him some props for his conclusions about the current state of baggerism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. well it's definitely a wing of the repig party, it was obvious
that not one speaker critized the repiggies, they only went after the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. That's a joke. Republican party=teabaggers/birthers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. How can a movement be hijacked when it doesn't exist?
500 people in the meeting room of a hotel does not a movement make. But hey, let them fight about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. They didn't seem to complain much when their popularity was gaining
and no mention of Glen Beck hmmmm........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. Sarah Palin is a natural born very talented manipulator who is out
to gain everything she can get for herself, and who does not care who she has to destroy in the process. She really has nothing to say or to offer to any serious cause or organization. Other than a low cunning,and an evil personality she is the definition of an empty suit.

I have no sympathy for the 'baggers-they were just targets of opportunity for a lot of people, but they evidently pinned some hope on Palin and she proceeded to shit in their punchbowl, and charged them $100,000 to watch her do it.


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. There's an opportunity here that Democrats need to exploit...
Kleineider should be on Olbermann next week and this article needs to go viral.

Split the movement and discredit that scheming opportunist to the point even
Faux won't want her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC