Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where the fuck is Rahm-bo?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 02:58 PM
Original message
Where the fuck is Rahm-bo?
Darrell Issa just called Obama a liar.

Obama won the election, the democrats are majorities in both houses. Tort reform is not a priority of the democrats, it's a priority of republicans, whom the voters rejected overwhelmingly.

Obama has every right to blow Issa off if he wants. He's the president of the United States. Issa is the ranking member of a congressional committee.

So Issa is way out of line for calling Obama a liar for not taking his orders. If he's out of line, someone should come down on him. Isn't that what Rahm is supposed to be so good at?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/08/house-republican-issa-cha_n_453398.html

President Obama's health care reform outreach to congressional Republicans got off to a bumpy start on Monday morning, when Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) blasted a statement to reporters headlined: "First Question for President Obama: Did You Lie About Moving Forward on Malpractice Reform?"

(...)

Spokespersons for the White House and HHS didn't immediately return requests for comment, but one thing at least is clear: Obama did instruct HHS to move forward on a specific tort-reform initiative, which is a major concession to the GOP and a setback for trial lawyers. We know that Obama did so because he made the instruction in public, in front of both the House and Senate and, for what it's worth, C-SPAN cameras as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rahm's poltics are too closely aligned with Issa to take him to task
Obama probably doesnt want to put his good buddy Rahm in a situation where he has to confront a fellow conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. You just embarassed yourself with that excessively ignorant statement.
Say what you want about Rahm, about how he operates, about how his connections, yadda, yadda, but hit VOTING RECORD is extremely liberal and to accuse him of being anything resembling a conservative shows that you care less about facts as they exist in reality and more about trashing someone you don't like, to the point that you would even lie and distort their ideological stance in order to do so. Shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. He's a Blue Dog
Sorry if that upsets you, but its true.

He's more conservative than most Democrats, and we wont even talk about how his dealings for Obama on HCR have dovetailed with his brother's desire to privatize much of Medicare.

If thats a Democratic position I guess our party is no longer a valid alternative to conservative Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. His voting record sais otherwise and you lack the ability to refute that.
Edited on Mon Feb-08-10 04:00 PM by phleshdef
http://www.ontheissues.org/IL/Rahm_Emanuel.htm

That is not a blue dog's voting record. Next time inform yourself and actually know what you are talking about, maybe you will avoid making a fool out of yourself.

He supported NAFTA and a few other things that aren't great, but he has just as liberal a voting record as anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. His actions NOW says you're wrong
He's no friend to liberals, unless you enjoy being told your ideals are "fucking retarded".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Oh no, don't try to change the subject. You said he was a conservative.
I clearly showed you how "fucking retarded" such a statement like that is based on his voting record. You can disagree with his tactics or his compromises and things like that, I all ready said that was fine by me, but he is in no way even close to being a conservative as I have clearly proven. You have egg on your face because of your statement, wipe it off and move on.

And please, stop lying. The story was never that Rahm Emmanual said that liberal ideals were "fucking retarded", he said running ads against the healthcare reform bill was "fucking retarded", and I agree, it was because it was extremely counterproductive to making any progress at all. Please refrain from lying about stuff like this in the future, it doesn't help your argument at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Semantics
I said he was a conservative, as in his actions now in the WH.

You claimed his past voting record said otherwise.

Again I say his actions NOW says he's a conservative.

He's running the HCR effort for Obama, theres nothing liberal about the direction he's been aiming for.

As I said before, he's a Blue Dog (as in NOW), sorry if that opinion upsets you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Its not an opinion that upsets me. Its one that makes me laugh because its so damned ignorant.
You don't even know what his "actions now" are. All you know are a few off hand quotes from some tabloid-esque media pieces and your own desire to craft some opinion about someone that you obviously know nothing about.

And agreeing or disagree with the direction of the current healthcare bill, saying that there is anything conservative about it further illustrates an ignorance on your part, especially when it comes to what "liberal" and "conservative" even mean. The conservative approach would be to not want a bill at all as it is a move by the government to manipulate the health insurance market. This healthcare bill may not be particularly progressive, not as much as many would like, but its definately liberal just based on the fact that regulating the insurance industry is involved. You don't GET to have an opinion on that, its not a subjective thing that lends itself to an opinion. Words have definitions and meanings and you, contrary to what you may think, don't GET to decide what they mean.

You can continue to blather on with more blatant ignorance and continue to show us all how ill informed you are on matters of politics and political language. It doesn't bother me one bit. But expect to be called on it and I could give less of a shit if that upsets you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. We disagree
Get over it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. If he had EVER ACTUALLY SAID THAT, you might have a point.
Making shit up FAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. +100.
Whether you like Rahm and his style and pragmatism or not, he IS deeply on the side of the left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Obama Admin doesn't have time to respond to every single accusation made by a repug hack. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. should they respond to this one do you think?
imo there's no question about it. Issa is way out of line and people should know that. What about you, on this one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Rahm should kick Issa's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Something along the lines of "YOU LIE" would be appropriate, I think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. He's lying in the mud with survival knife at the ready waiting for a liberal to cross him
He's coming for YOU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. Under orders to stay under the radar, no doubt
until his latest abomination circles the memory hole.

x(
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC