Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Calculator: What Does The Health Care Bill Mean For You?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 07:26 AM
Original message
Calculator: What Does The Health Care Bill Mean For You?
(Ezra Klein linked to this in his blog, and thinks it's pretty good.)
What does the health care bill mean to me?

The health-care overhaul will change the way millions of Americans get health insurance and require nearly everyone to have health insurance or face penalties. A number of factors - including income, age, location and family size - will determine how it specifically impacts your life. This tool looks at what it could mean for your health coverage and taxes based on your income, family size and current insurance status.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/what-health-bill-means-for-you/?nav=most_emailed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. No changes for me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. No change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. It doesn' say if my premiums will go up or down...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tailormyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Nobody really knows yet what will happen
I'm betting that they don't go down unless forced to go down by the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. True, but with a mandated pool of insurance the natural pressure would be to lower prices.
More members in pools should equal less risk... but I'll bet insurers pocket that money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tailormyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
29. I think they will pocket the profits too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. It says I'll get tax credits to ensure premiums will be no more than $8,027 in 2014.
Edited on Tue Mar-23-10 08:35 AM by JTFrog
That's less than half what our premiums are now for just me and my husband... and as soon as we find out how, we'll be putting our three boys back on our insurance who fell off after their 19th birthdays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tailormyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. No change for me
Still no insurance. However, the student loan companies who get my tax refund every year will be getting less after the fine is taken out of my refund.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. The reconciliation bill removes the fine for not insuring.
Not sure how the mandate is supposed to be enforced, but I suspect that Nancy P has some ideas about both the mandate and enforcement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. No change, no new taxes - and I still do not like it, even though my 23-year old daughter
can now be covered.

Whatever minimal benefits might accrue from this law are negated by the lost opportunity to really make major, progressive advancements in how this country takes (medical) care of its people.

There will be no "fixes" down the road - this has been one-and-done for our cowardly politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. Huge for me and 3 of my employees
It gives a substantial tax break for me if I keep our small company health plan. We have had a 60% increase in premiums in the past 2 years. We were at the edge of the cliff but now will be able to maintain the plan. If we had folded the plan 3 of 5 employees would not have been able to get their own insurance because of pre-existing conditions. This has taken huge pressure off of me in what has been a horrible business cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Good to hear!
The biggest change for me is if my husband ever lost his job and our insurance, eventually I would not be turned down for new insurance because of having diabetes. I have looked into what it would mean to switch insurance and some providers will cover the pre-existing condition and some won't. It is a very uneasy feeling to have that over your head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. That is terrific to hear!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. No change for me but if you're poor or unemployed you are forced to pay
insurance companies and are penalized on your taxes if you don't.

And they STILL can deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions and deny claims altogether.

No change for me but for a lot of people whose life is already hard enough and who can afford it the least, life just got harder. The people who can least afford to pay are now going to have to pay into a broken system based on corprat profit and greed.

So - uh yea. WHERE is the 'reform'? Is that IT?

Pfft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Wrong...
The bill has exceptions for persons who cannot obtain insurance, either because they are not insurable or because they can't afford to pay. What's more, despite the current hysteria about the IRS hiring 17,000 tax examiners to enforce Healthcare Reform, the law specifically prohibits criminal penalties, levies and liens to be used to collect the fine.

Children with pre-existing conditions cannot be denied effective on the day Obama signs the bill. Adults with pre-existing conditions can get coverage through a government-established high risk pool until 2014, when insurance companies will then be barred from denying coverage on account of pre-existing conditions.

The people who can least afford to pay are going to pay anything for this unless that have actual coverage.

Pfft right back at you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. It's disturbing how wrong you are. You haven't been paying attention have you? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Paying attention to the misinformation squad, perhaps.
They're working it pretty hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
47. All you have to do is start plugging in numbers to know how wrong you are (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kjackson227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
11. No IMMEDIATE change for me, but in four years...
this will save me $245.00 per month. Also, the HCR will be in place if my daughter (who has a pre-existing condition), gets laid off from her job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
12. None....and I'm good with that
I have health care with reasonable coverage and a reasonable price.

According to this calculator, I won't pay any additional taxes. That's OK, but honestly I would be willing to pay more if it meant everybody got coverage.

And when we finally do adopt the Public Option, I'm willing to dig a little deeper to make it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
13. Cut my premiums in half in 2014 and add my 3 boys back on my insurance no extra cost now.
Edited on Tue Mar-23-10 08:32 AM by JTFrog
What this bill means for my taxes:

You will not pay any additional taxes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Yowza!
That's like winning the lottery!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
17. That "calculator" is terrible
I agree that most of us will not be affected. However, there are some things that would appear many of us:

http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/Web/20102724.htm

For instance, the cut in FSA will impact us for about $560 a year (2,500 x 22.5%). For those that have medical expenses not covered by insurance (for instance, in vitro), you will see your AGI threshold for medical deductions go from 7.5% to 10%.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. It is terrible - I work for a small business and it offers little to no information
How annoying.

Your link is helpful as another I read doesn't mention the tax credits being pro-rated when your company is between 10 & 25 employees (which is, of course, the size of my company!!). Thanks for the link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. "You will not pay any additional taxes..."
WHAT!? .... You mean I'm being LIED to by crazies BS artists on the right AND the left!!! NO WAY!!!!

:)

Thanks for posting! Will send to everyone I know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. No changes
thanks for posting this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrell9584 Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
21. Says I now have to pay over $200 a month
To private companies after subsidies. Money I don't have.


So the choice for me is satisfy the mandate and forget about graduate school part time and bettering my life or better my life, pay the fine and simply degrade the choice of food I have and more lost time shopping as I won't now be able to go out as much as I'll need to cut back on gas.


This bill is bullshit. Anyone making under $50,000 shouldn't have to pay a goddamned dime. It should all be subsidized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. You wrote...
"Anyone making under $50,000 shouldn't have to pay a goddamned dime. It should all be subsidized."

Are you married with dependent children? 50K is a quite a bit to not pay a DIME. This kind of program isn't every going to be free...those who have above a certain income should be paying their fair share.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
22. What is it with writers these days who cannot use the words yearly or monthly?
I know they mean yearly, but it's annoying since they are targeting an audience that does not know, and worse, it's not just this site, it's all over the place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
26. Step daughter gets to stay on for 3 more years
but other than that everything stays the same and lifetime limits they just told me i had will be gone soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
27. I might get tax breaks, we will pay no new taxes, my wife - on Medicare-
won't have the "donut hole" to pay - a huge savings, her meds are quite expensive.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
30. No change, Im still getting fucked over
Im getting gouged as of April 1st (40% hike in premiums, $5000 yearly deductible) and this bill does absolutely nothing to stop it. I wont be able to afford to get sick after April 1st and I have "insurance." Sad, sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. HHS Sebelius is being urged by Dems to rollback and/or reduce these premium increases
Your problem is a 'big f*cking deal,' as well. Let's hope the Obama administration can stop this outrageous move by the insurance companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. Well, I am a lot more HOPEful now that something has actually happened
...on the healthcare front
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greencharlie Donating Member (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
33. doesn't help me...
We don't qualify for subsidies, don't currently have insurance... and will have to buy insurance or pay $2100 per year fine.

So HOW is this better than universal HC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Can you not afford insurance (pre-existing condition) or do you choose not to buy it?
Edited on Wed Mar-24-10 02:28 PM by flpoljunkie
Starting in 2014, require that most Americans have a minimum level of health insurance or else pay a penalty.

Would revise the penalty for some years: In 2014, $95 a year or 1 percent household’s income; in 2015, $325 or 2 percent of income; in 2016, $695 or 2.5 percent of income (with a maximum of $2,085 for a family).

Instead of using the poverty threshold to exempt low-income people, the bill would exempt households with incomes below the tax-filing threshold — $9,350 for individuals and $18,700 for couples in 2009.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/03/19/us/politics/20100319-health-care-reconciliation.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greencharlie Donating Member (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. well...
we live in SoCal, which is really expensive. For our family we would need to pay about $450 per month... we choose to spend our money on other things like food, housing, transportation and education... So we're ineligible because of our income, but can't afford insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Perhaps your employer will be eligible for a subsidy and you will be able to get insurance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. Exceptions to the individual mandate
Q: Are there any exceptions to the individual mandate?

A. Yes. The approved measure provides hardship exceptions for those individuals and families whose incomes are too small to be able to afford the premiums required to pay for a basic insurance policy. More specifically, individuals or families who find that the least expensive policy available requires more than 9.8% of household income would be exempted from the mandate.

http://www.realtor.org/small_business_health_coverage.nsf/Pages/health_ref_faq_indiv_mandates?OpenDocument
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
36. Hopefully Kaiser (who has the only semi-affordable plan around)
won't pull the stunt that Blue Cross did when I tried to get a policy through them several years ago - they obviously suspected I HAD to have a PEC (because I hadn't seen a doctor in years, but was in excellent health with no such PEC) and so they dragged their feet and just couldn't find a way to process my application, claiming they couldn't get records from doctors.

It's illegal to deny a policy in CA for PEC and has been for years, but this is how they get around it. If they have any reason to suspect, they just won't process your application.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I just got a Kaiser plan in CA
Hadn't had a plan for years or seen a doctor.

They let me right in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
38. Nothing.
Which means I'll still be paying premiums and not getting care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
41. I can buy into the exchange in 2014 but won't get a subsidy or any help

Sounds expensive to me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
44. over 26 years old, single, $40,000 income
"Beginning in 2014...the tax credits will ensure you do not spend more than $3800 on premiums. Your maximum out-of-pocket costs for deductibles and co-payments would be capped at 30% of total cost."

Gives only the max, doesn't really indicate what you would have to pay or what the subsidy would be. I assume the insurance companies will use the calculator and charge the max.

How's an individual making $40,000 with no health problems going to feel about having to come up with $3800 a year plus 30%?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. There will be a much less expensive catastrophic plan for people up to the age of 30.
Edited on Thu Mar-25-10 07:07 AM by flpoljunkie
If insurance is not affordable, people will not buy it. That will be a problem that will have to be fixed--perhaps thru a public option plan that will really work to drive down the cost or health insurance.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/03/19/us/politics/20100319-health-care-reconciliation.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. Compared to now you mean?
Where before the bill the chances are that someone making $40K has no chance of affording insurance on their own?
$3800 a year is around $300 per month. A single person making $40K per year, taking home around $2666 a month has a good chance of affording that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
46. We should keep kicking this. Skinner/mods might even want to pin this to the top
This link should be sent to everyone you know. I have it on my facebook page, have sent it out to coworkers, etc. It is EXACTLY what we need.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
49. Kickety kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC