Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cool health care reform time line from AFL-CIO

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 11:33 AM
Original message
Cool health care reform time line from AFL-CIO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Great visual
still may be a bit hard for the teabaggers to 'get it'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They're busy looking for death panels on it.*
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. And SOME of the 9/23 provisions are already in effect...
... children covered until age 26 by most insurers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's a shame about all the people who will die between now and 2014.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Think ahead to 9/23/10 and imagine all the kids who will live. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. It's a shame there's not a date that tells us when we'll all be guraranteed access to care
not just "coverage".

Like people in civilized countries have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yes, whatever happened to the plan that covered everybody immediately?
You know, the Utopian plan that would simply print money during the worst recession since the Great Depression?

Do you know what happened to that plan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. You know - the plan that would have started expanding Medicare to more groups
Edited on Wed May-12-10 12:54 PM by dflprincess
Strange how every other developed country manages to provide their citizens access to health care but when it's suggested the U.S. do the same, the idea is slammed as being "utopian".

If the U.S. can afford to pay the private insurers billions in the form of subsidized premiums - it could afford to start expanding Medicare.

If Obama thinks we can afford to escalate in Afghanistan during the "worst recession since the Great Depression", there is no reason he shouldn't have thought we could afford health care - something that would have helped Americans during the "worst recession since the Great Depression".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. The citizens of the nation should be given first priority and I can't
think of anything more important than life or death issues. Money was shipped to Wall Street by the boat loads, but the uninsured are still lining up at Remote Area Medical events. I guess it's easy to dismiss those in need of medical care if you yourself have access to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Any estimate on the number who would have died if we descended into a worldwide depression?
Edited on Wed May-12-10 03:03 PM by HughMoran
Millions?

Billions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Any estimate on those who wouldn't have died if we hadn't continued
to funnel money by the billions into Iraq and Afghanistan? If we didn't have 100 military bases scattered all over the world? There's plenty of money available for social issues, but social issues don't generate profits for big business so it's easier to let people die of diseases that might not be terminal if you lived in Great Britain, Canada, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, France and a host of other countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. You'll get no argument from me about the milititary industrial complex
Edited on Wed May-12-10 04:45 PM by HughMoran
...and I admire your 'kitchen sink' approach - eventually something will stick.

BTW, people in those countries do pay for their coverage, albeit it's much more efficient than our system! I'm all for it; sadly - it'll be a long time coming here so we're going to have to deal with what we have and continue fighting for incremental changes as many of those countries did to get the system they have today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. That is good but there must be a lot more items than that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I'd give Joe Liebermann or Ben Nelson or Evan Bayh or Blanch Lincoln or Mary Landrieu a call
They might be able to fill you in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Oooo! Print, Copy and Post around Town!. . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is a Great Start..I appreciate what we have
now and can build on. This will help our economic structure too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. A question about pre-existing conditions....
The timeline gives "Coverage for pre-existing conditions" as soon as the bill is signed. Then in the "by 2014" category, there's "Total ban on pre-existing condition denials". Obviously, therefore, the immediate "coverage" isn't total. Would someone who's familiar with the bill explain what happens immediately in this respect? I have a suspicion that it has something to do with the high-risk pools, but I don't have a clear picture of whether those will offer genuinely affordable coverage, beginning immediately, to people with pre-existing conditions.

Thanks for any light anyone can shed!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Kids with preexisting conditions can't be denied insurance now
Whether or not they will be able to actually get care will depend on how much "coverage" the parent can afford.

The ban on denying adults with preexisting conditions insurance kicks in in a few years with no guarantee they'll actually be able to access care either.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Thanks! That's helpful.
I agree with you that there are major unanswered questions about what kind of insurance coverage people will actually be able to obtain (considering premiums, co-pays, and deductibles), as well as the more important question about what kind of health care they'll actually receive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
21. No mention of 2018 when the "cadillac plan" exemption ends? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC