Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Webb says he'll vote NO on DADT repeal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
rhombus Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 04:50 PM
Original message
Sen. Webb says he'll vote NO on DADT repeal
Edited on Tue May-25-10 05:30 PM by rhombus
Webb's statement:

"Secretary of Defense Gates and Admiral Mullen have laid out a specific and responsible plan to examine the current 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy in a manner that includes a comprehensive survey of those wearing the uniform. The White House and Secretary Gates both said today that, ideally, the Defense Department should complete this review before legislative action is taken. There is no question that a review of the policy is necessary and important. I see no reason for the political process to pre-empt it."


Webb disappoints. Sheesh.

http://www.openleft.com/diary/18853/jim-webb-announces-opposition-to-dadt-deal


PS. What Webb fails to understand is after the 2010 elections, Democrats will have less of a majority in the senate and the House to move major bills. The time for action is this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
VMI Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Webb is a Progressive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. replace 'progressive' with 'political coward'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Not hardly
DLC | New Dem Of The Week | May 7, 2008
Jim Webb
U.S. Senator, Virginia

http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=103&subid=110&contentid=254630
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VMI Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Its a reference to a goofy OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilyeye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
72. Yeah...how about that.
There was a poster here months ago that said Webb should have been elected because he wasn't a coward like our President. I wonder where that poster is now......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. homophobic jerk. if he wasn't, then he'd understand that Gays are already serving honorably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Phuck him...
I am so sick ofm this wimpy shit from guys like him. Phuck him and all the democrats who have no balls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not a surprise. There are several Democrats who are bigots
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dammit. And, I used to like Webb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. I want him to say it to this Marine's face:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. I thought Webb would not do this ...
I am getting the impression that both of my Virginia Senators (Webb and Warner) are Blue Dogs. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. You thought they were progressives?
Liberals?

And you think Obama is DLC?

Oh my.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. That sure explains a lot!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
47. Oh my, is right
Let's see - Obama, our most liberal President in 40 years and Kerry, the 6th most liberal Senator are too conservative for her, but she previously thought Webb - about the 6th most conservative Democrat is a Progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #16
68. ROTFLMAO! I agree with jemito. That explains a helluva lot. (nt)
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
45. Seeing that he:
1) Came close to swiftboating our nominee in 2004 (though Kerry forgave him and endorsed him in the primary and raised his GOTV money for the primary - I never will trust him. Especially as from the Rolling Stone article his problem was a disagreement on whether the war could have been won.
2) had said some pretty unsupportive things about women in the military
3) has voted wrong on many issues - especially on the environment
4) He STILL thinks we could have won and repeated the same ridiculous poll to insist the Vietnam War was popular in the early 1970s

Why are you surprised??

He was a Reagan Republican Secretary of the Navy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
46. He is he used to be a Repug..
evidently he still is, he goes against just about everything Dems want..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
65. you thought they were liberal ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
78. are you serious? really? and you call obama and kerry conservatives?
this really DOES explain a lot... CRUISIEL MISSLES!11!!!

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. LOL!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
82. Are you getting the impression that somebody just invented the automobile?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Where are the votes? Even if you get Collins, Snowe, and Hatch
I bet Lincoln, Landrieu, Pryor, and Nelson vote no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I've always considered Webb more liberal than Warner, I bet Warner votes "no" also.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Depends on what. Webb is conservative on social issues. I am not sure where Warner is,
but he could be more progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
25.  Mark Warner is pro choice and he may be progressive on gay rights
Edited on Tue May-25-10 05:58 PM by saracat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
50. Warner is considerably younger, which on this matters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. On Hardball they just said we need one more vote in the Senate - mentioned the Nelsons & Brown
(although Brown said no already).

Brown needs to have his phones swamped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
38. Bill Nelson might, Ben will most definitely not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #38
81. He does now!!
"Sen. Ben Nelson Announces Support For DADT Repeal Compromise"

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/05/26/nelson-dadt-gates/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
51. Kerry needs to do another bike ride with Brown
He might be able to convince him, because he actually was on active duty for over three years and his 1993 comments rally were exceptional for 1993.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. Wont happen. For Brown, this is the perfect bill to show that he is a RWer.
without being accused to be against the middle class. This guy is a phony, get used to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. won't it hurt in Ma?
I know he is a very empty suited phony. That is obvious every time he speaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VMI Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Lost my vote, jackass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. Figures. Intolerance rules. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. Of course he will. This is the same guy who opposed women in the military
at some point in his life, and may in fact still does. He probably feels the same way about blacks serving. Wouldn't surprise me at all. Don't understand why these damned Dixiecrats don't just become Republicans and get it over with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
35. Webb might have declared himself a moderate republican in the 1970s?
That's how far corporate right our party has become. The GOP are just outright shameless corporatists, no questions asked. There are a few democrats who have a spark of "the peoples' welfare" on their minds, but not many ... and not Webb. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. Buh bye, Jimmeh.
I don't support bigots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VMI Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. He's not a bigot. He probably doesn't mean it. He's just saying it to get elected.
He's a Progressive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
41. I get it
:rofl: :rofl: Very nice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. whatanasshole!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
20. But But everyone said it was wrong to oppose him, and he would
Edited on Tue May-25-10 06:04 PM by saracat
vote with us when it counted. Really? Where are the Blue Dogs when we need their vote? Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
52. In 2006, it was essential - it gave us the majority
That was important, even though we were stopped from doing much good - because at least they weren't passing more things making it worse. In addition, we controlled what came up in summer 2008. This kept Obama from having a lot of no win votes or having to deal with the nonsense Kerry did - where he would fly to DC for an important vote ... to find it was re-sceduled.

He was our 5ist vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #52
61.  Baloney. Sorry. We got to set the agenda and did squat with it.
I will never ever again vote for candidates who do not support civil rights. . This is a crock.When it comes to a crunch, they do not support us but vote with the GOP. Just like Stupak. that vote hurt us more than it ever benefited us. It revolts me that the Democratic Party actually supported such a man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. You know I dislike him, but there was a huge difference
having the majority. The difference was that we were losing fighting for things we wanted versus losing on bills that were rolling back every thing people had fought for,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. Webb has very conservative constituents who supported him.
Are we all not aware that many Senators (Ds) can be over
a barrel on Cultural Issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. I grow weary of the "conservative constituents" argument. Over 70% of Americans
back this change...his district would likely be no different than the rest of America. I suppose you also believe the false meme of America as a center-right nation too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
39. The President (who campaigned on DADT repeal) also won his state
I don't buy the conservative constituents argument unless it's in a district or state that Democrats haven't won on the presidential level in recent years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
44. It's an issue of right and wrong. He's wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
23. This just one of the reasons I liked Obama's nod to Congress to move forward.
It makes Democrats show their true colors.

Webb is shit now in my eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. so how many fake-Democrats are there in the senate??? just wonderin', seems like an easy 5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. Republican Susan Collins of Maine has now said she will vote to end DADT.
How sad that we have Democrats who are running away from what they know is correct for their own ambitions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #40
71. thanks for the update David... was hoping someone would stand up... Thanks to Susan & shame on webb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
26. Shrug - same shit different day.
Voting for him would be a mistake.

But I can hear the chorus now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #26
34. I am disappointed in Webb
particularly since the latest polls show that 80% of the public supports repeal of DADT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
30. I think we should give Webb whatever he wants, so he'll vote for it
This can be up to and including a small puppy processing factory that makes delicious puppy nuggets for his home district.

What?

If we can do it for other conservadems on other legislation, why not here? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
31. You link says Webb is undediced and doesn't have that quote.
What gives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhombus Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I've updated to a new link with Webb's statement
Webb is a NO. Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Thanks.
Edited on Tue May-25-10 05:38 PM by Radical Activist
Although it doesn't sound to me like Webb has made a final decision about repeal, as the post claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
36. I thought the point of compromise was We get something; You get something.
So what the FUCKING FUCK did we get? I smell a SET UP here! I think this "compromise" was a LIE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
37. Then Webb's a coward.
Now is our chance--NOW. We have to do it NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. We need progressive leaders with moral courage..
As long as the right wing corporatists control ALL THREE BRANCHES of our government, we will not see any truly progressive/fair legislation passed in favor of the average American. :(

We have to build a true progressive coalition. That's our only choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
43. I predict this will end with a Stupak style compromise
The President will sign an executive order saying that the policy won't be changed until the Pentagon completes its study and Jim Webb will be standing behind the President while he signs it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. I believe that's already in the legislation.
At the very least, it requires the approval of Gates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #49
59. Yea but the President as commander-in-chief can say the study is done whenver he wants to
Webb will force a commitment out of him that he won't do it before December (which he was already not going to do anyway) and score political points and everybody will go home happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
48. Fuck him. Hopefully Snowe and Collins, and maybe Brown, will make the difference. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #48
54. Brown already announced NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. Yeah, I saw that.
I think there's at least one other Republican vote they're relying on, though--not sure who.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #48
69. I think Collins said yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
53. A profile in cowardice. And bigotry.
Hope he gets primaried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
55. How many godfrickindamn studies do we need, Webb?
You're taking the easy way out on this, Webb... and you know it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
60. Another dissapointment
Webb should know better I believed he would make a difference and he has proven that he is just another selfish jackass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
62. Indefensible to have the civil rights of one group voted on by (ostensibly) another
indefensible.

i thought the flag he fought for represented something better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #62
75. No vote = status quo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
64. I'm sure that Senator is Webb fully understands that. He also understands that he is
up for reelection in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
66. why are people surprised by this ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. I dunno.
I think they easily forgot his other positions---which were not 100% liberal Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #67
70. most of his positions weren't liberal
Edited on Wed May-26-10 02:28 AM by JI7
but i remember those who attacked Kerry and now Obama saying how they need to learn from Jim Webb.

and i remember all those Webb for President talk from them.

hahha, i'm just thinking of how many of them attacked Martha Coakley as dlc and supported Webb. these people claim to represent the left. hahahhaha

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #70
74. He was a former Republican, wasn't he? I think it was his stance
on Iraq that won over the progressives. He has always been moderate to conservative Dem to me.
Sad when a moderate Repub from Maine is more progressive on this issue then a Dem. Sad but not surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #66
83. Not surprised but it still pisses me off. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
73. Obama's fault!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #73
77. How so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
76. This is why you need to vote for the repeal of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell,' Senator Webb.
House Republicans are preparing to mount a vigorous defense of the “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy President Bill Clinton implemented in 1993.

GOP lawmakers in the lower chamber are poised to vote en masse against the defense authorization bill if it includes an amendment to repeal the law barring gays and lesbians from serving openly in the U.S. military.

Over the objections of some Republicans, Clinton issued his “Don’t ask, don’t tell” directive nearly 17 years ago. Since then, many Republicans have warmed to it — especially now that liberals want to eradicate it.

A senior Republican aide on Tuesday said Rep. Buck McKeon (Calif.), the ranking Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, has told his members he will vote against the underlying defense measure if Democrats attach Rep. Patrick Murphy’s (D-Pa.) “Don’t ask, don’t tell” amendment.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/99887-gop-to-defend-clinton-policy-on-dont-ask
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
80. Webb already *has* his civil rights, thank you very much.
Fuck everyone else.

Or fuck some very particular someone elses, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
84. Object lesson: There are at least 3 good reasons to fire any sitting Congressman, and none of them
offer 2 good reasons to keep them.

dadt, hairpiece, patriot act - your results may vary. Check it out for yourself, pick a member of Congress, try to find more than 2 times this term when he did something beyond "the least that can be expected" for People. Now see if you can find 3 times when he took action favorable to corporations at the expense of People. It's time the People started saying NO to bad government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC