Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I want our President to clear out ALL of Cheney's people out of our government. Now!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:13 AM
Original message
I want our President to clear out ALL of Cheney's people out of our government. Now!
Edited on Fri Jun-04-10 09:16 AM by Mika
This is job #1 imo. Cheney's people are the wrecking crew, they and their anti American activities must be stopped.

ENOUGH!


There. I said it. :rant: = off


K&R if you agree.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. I can't think of a better way to get the car out of the ditch.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. I agree.They gotta go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think we're finding out that fundamentally, their ideologies aren't all that different.
They're both Friedmanites, one just wears it on his sleeve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. I recall a big push by the Bush/Cheney junta to "permanently" place
these people in these civil service positions for life just after Obama was elected. I'm sure Obama is having to deal with incompetent boneheads he can't fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. I'm sure there are ways to eliminate people.
Edited on Fri Jun-04-10 12:07 PM by LiberalFighter
If they can't find legitimate reasons to fire them they should be able to eliminate jobs requiring those losing their jobs to accept a position elsewhere in the government. Or going back into the civilian job sector. If their jobs were created specifically for them then the work required for that position can either be eliminated or allocated to other positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrJJ Donating Member (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. Easier said then done
Edited on Fri Jun-04-10 09:41 AM by mrJJ
Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Before leaving office, the Interior Department's top lawyer has shifted half a dozen key deputies -- including two former political appointees who have been involved in controversial environmental decisions -- into senior civil service posts.

The transfer of political appointees into permanent federal positions, called "burrowing" by career officials, creates security for those employees.

As early as 2006, the Government Accountability Office reported that 144 employees in 23 agencies had converted from noncareer to career positions. In some cases, jobs seemed tailored to the strengths of the applicants, if not created for them outright. In others, standard competitive hiring procedures appeared absent. And in three instances, political staffers received career positions even though they lacked the requisite "qualifications and/or experience..."

Between March 1 and Nov. 3, according to the federal OPM, the Bush administration allowed 20 political appointees to become career civil servants. Six political appointees to the Senior Executive Service, the government's most prestigious and highly paid employees, have received approval to take career jobs at the same level. Fourteen other political, or "Schedule C," appointees have also been approved to take career jobs. One candidate was turned down by OPM and two were withdrawn by the submitting agency.

The personnel moves come as Bush administration officials are scrambling to cement in place policy and regulatory initiatives that touch on issues such as federal drinking-water standards, air quality at national parks, mountaintop mining and fisheries limits.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/17/AR2008111703537.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. That's what I was afraid of.
The next time the pukes take power we have to be sure that we do the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Thanks! Here's the link for that:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrJJ Donating Member (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. TY
Thanks updated link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. There has to be a
way to get rid of those who were 'burrowed.'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. You can get rid of burrowed employees who won't do their jobs
in all sorts of ways.

Just takes the fortitude to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Defining them not doing their job would be difficult.
Otherwise, if they were just dismissed, the Obama admin would have a slew of labor lawsuits about termination without cause.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. With some of the activities going on at the agencies- not really
Edited on Fri Jun-04-10 07:12 PM by depakid
and forcing folks to file lawsuits can be strategic in the sense that it costs money for the plaintiff- and also acts as a deterrent for others to engage in similar behavior.

Seen more than a few civil servants get the axe in my day. Some have managed to get their positions back after some considerable effort. Others not.

One of this administrations biggest problems- across the board- is that no one fears them- and no one is worried about being held accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #21
43. But Republicans don't believe in labor laws!
In most red states, employers can hire at will and fire at will, and any constraint on those rights is viewed as unAmerican socialism. Surely Republican appointees wouldn't preach one law for the rest of us and another for themselves? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
38. Funny how those who make it so easy for the rest of us to get fired....
... have the system rigged so that it is almost impossible for them to get fired?


Again, how is this whole system not a big rip off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
I agree. I wish he had done it before now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. Names?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. Agreed! The moles need to go. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. How? The GOP bastards in office won't even let half his admin in for working.
He had to issue an executive order to get some of them. And you think he can remove some of these people? Unlikely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. agree but Obama and team seem to be afraid of them
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Seriously, I wouldn't put it past Cheney to engineer a 9/11 type event
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Where do you get the perception that they are afraid of them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #25
55. because they won't say anything at all negative about Israel


they ok every bit of money going to Israel

they prefer silence on all thing Israel

all of which isn't normal

this leads to thinking they are afraid of them but it could also mean they agree 100% with all things Israel

both ways are not normal reactions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
16. Agreed - kick and rec n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
18. Yes, and why wasn't this done early on?
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. It couldn't be done easily and early. Remember the burrowing?
BushCo "burrowed" almost 200 people in various places in the federal government before they left.

They were placed in positions where it would be very difficult to remove them, except if those employees did something illegal. Those positions were for up to two years, and those people couldn't be released without cause unless the Obama Administration wanted to face a slew of individual labor lawsuits for termination without cause.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Ah, I'd forgotten about that. Thanks for the reminder.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #20
39. Yeah, but all those positions are not at the admin office level... they are still bound to policy
and policy is dictated from the top down. That means these people can not go on their own devices, and if they do so... then they are contradicting policy in which case they can be fired for not doing their jobs properly.

Seriously, it is not that f*cking hard. But this requires strong leadership, not milquetoast tap dancing pretty please bipartisanship bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burnsei sensei Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
50. It should have been done
the second Obama hit the executive chair.
The connections of Cheney and Bush were part of their leadership. They worked for the oil and defense-related industries.
Every person they had in regulatory staff should have come immediately under scrutiny, and most should have been booted.
But the message was never made clear.
The idea that nothing had changed was evident. And so things went on as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
19. Nice thought, but isn't going to happen
Edited on Fri Jun-04-10 11:25 AM by nichomachus
I said, even before the election, that the biggest problem Obama was going to face were the thousands and thousands of fascist "left-behinds" that Cheney and Bush would use to poison the well. They can't be gotten rid of easily, if at all, and the government is filled with them.

A good example is the horrid Mormon left-behind who write the disgusting DOMA brief comparing gays and lesbians to child molesters and rapists. I'm pretty sure Obama never would have done that on his own hook, but once this Mormon activist had written his brief, Obama was blindsided, couldn't undo it, and ended up taking the heat.

I'm not saying Obama is blameless. I don't trust him as far as I can see him -- and not even then -- but I won't blame him for being set up by Cheney and Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
23. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
26. This has been the problem all along..
before he was inaugurated they were plotting and planning, for all of the obstacles they could put in his way.

The moles have been leaking and the CONS have been stalling,the blue dogs have been blocking stimulus,and anything that would help the country or the President,in their eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
27. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
28. job #1
I agree completely

oh and lock Cheney up while yer at it. WE need to set a better example. Currently he is an example of how you can get away with murder and mayhem and laugh your ass off all the way to the bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
29. Fill all the positions with really smart progressives and if the Repubs get back in
they will have to deal with it. Just the way Obama has to deal with the Bushies there right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caveat_imperator Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #29
54. Unfortunately, the rethugs would deal with it
Edited on Sat Jun-05-10 09:23 AM by caveat_imperator
by simply breaking the law. And if there's any uproar they'll simply play the media and make the good guys look like the villains again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
31. Absofreakinglutely!
Time for a clean sweep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
32. K and R (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
33. The sooner the better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib_wit_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
34. All vestiges of the Bush Admin should have been fired just as blatantly as Bush fired the Justice
Department "traitors." We have to fight fire with fire!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
35. Screw the Unions!.... Wait....
Maybe you haven't thought this through. Many of the "Cheney" people are also AFSCME union employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
36. The other day a rep from the DNC called looking for a donation...
I told him, I will never vote for a republican, but I'm very disappointed that the Democrats never held the former administration accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
37. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PinkFloyd Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
40. I couldn't believe he held on to them in the first place!
Given how wildly unpopular the former administration was, why on Earth keep even one person around from it. I expected an immediate house cleaning. It was my first Obama disappointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capitalocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
41. That rant was short but to the point
K&R because I agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
42. BINGO!
these people are dangerous! knr!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
44. I'd like to know why he hasn't done that already. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
45. It's troubling he kept them on
in the first place. It's indefensible, but I'm sure some here will try to excuse it anyway.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
46. K & R! I feel abandoned by my party of a lifetime. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
47. Should have been the first item on the agenda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
48. I've been sreaming this for the past 500 days.the 5th, 4th, and 3rd teirs have to be cleaned ......
Edited on Sat Jun-05-10 07:49 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
should have been done in the 1st week.....hell we haven't even cleared tier 1 yet due to the fucking repukes filibusting every nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burnsei sensei Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
49. This is a highly appropriate and wise
federal response.
It's only a beginning, but the people involved in regulation have to be such that they hold no interest in the profitability of the regulated.
No stock options, no deals, no profit-sharing, no former sweetheart packages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
51. A BIG Kick! Wonder If Any Of Them Are Listening??? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
52. The easist way is to change their work reporting location...........
to a white room with a desk & chair. Thats all no phone no contact. I say in about 6 months they all would be gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawnKorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
53. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dwilso40641 Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
56. K&R N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
57. You would have thought that simple common sense would have told him to do that
before he walked through the door of the White House the first time. I guess not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstinamotorcity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
58. Shooter is and always
will be a thorn in America's side. He was corrupt as they come. And he along with every congressmen who voted with the Dubya/Shooter administration need to be voted out of office and thrown in jail for fraud,extortion,torture,crimes against humanity,environmental treason,and any other crime that leads back to their doorstep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC