Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Happens in a 50-50 Senate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 04:32 PM
Original message
What Happens in a 50-50 Senate?

More importantly, there will be a mad dash to find someone to switch parties and shore up a majority. In 2000, that person was Vermont Republican Jim Jeffords. In 2008, Democrats convinced a beleaguered Arlen Specter to give them a true governing majority. And there were rumors in 2006 that, had he won re-election, Linc Chafee was prepared to make Harry Reid Majority Leader if need be.

With this in mind, here's a list of the top five potential Senate party switchers and a discussion of how likely each one is to switch:

#5. Mark Pryor – This Arkansas senator has to be looking at what is happening to the senior senator from his state with dread. After all, the question isn’t whether Blanche Lincoln is going to lose – it is by how much. Pryor’s voting record is actually the slightly more liberal of the two, and he’s going to have another two years of voting on the Democratic leaderships’ priorities if Schumer or Durbin is the leader.

But at the end of the day, it is hard to see this switch happening. Pryor is a scion of a prominent Democratic family in Arkansas, and he isn’t so far to the right that he’s completely out of place in the Democratic caucus. He’ll probably gut it out for four years and hope the environment improves. Chance of a switch: <1 percent.

#4. Joe Lieberman – Most readers will be shocked to see Lieberman this far down the list. After all, he endorsed John McCain, left the Democratic Party based on his support for the Iraq War, and torpedoed the “public option” in the health care bill. And as an independent, technically wouldn’t even have to switch parties – he’d just have to caucus with the Republicans.

But Lieberman could have switched parties in 2006 and handed control of the Senate back to the Republicans, but didn't. It probably would have made more sense back then when the Iraq War was a hotter issue. Lieberman’s apostasies tend to be on discrete issues – his overall voting record is just to the right of middle of the Democratic Party. At the end of the day, he really is a Democrat, and it is hard to see him feeling comfortable in a Southern-dominated Republican caucus. Chance of a switch: 1-2 percent.

#3. Jim Webb – Jim Webb is already a two-time party switcher. The former Reagan Administration official switched to the Republicans during the Vietnam War, and then switched back to the Democrats at some point in the 2000s. The biggest reason for his most recent turnabout, the Iraq War, has faded into the background of the national debate, and he actually may feel more at home with Republicans than Democrats on some issues.

But there are two reasons this probably won’t happen. First, Webb is really a man without a party. He’s a Jacksonian, and part of this is a strong streak of economic populism that is out of place with the modern GOP. Second, and more importantly, he’d have to make it through a GOP Convention to secure renomination, which seems almost impossible. It’s more likely he’ll hang up his spurs after one term. Chance of a switch: 2-3 percent.

#2. Ben Nelson – Nelson is without a doubt the most conservative Democrat in the chamber, and with good reason: He represents one of the most Republican states in the Union. On a wide swath of issues, from abortion, to taxation, to gun rights, he is already a far more certain vote for Republicans than Democrats.

There’s just one little thing. He already voted for the Democrats’ health bill, destroying his credibility with Republicans. If he were going to switch parties, it would have made sense during the Bush Administration, or during the health care debate. It’s almost certain that he’d get the “Specter treatment” in the 2012 Republican primary. He may choose to take his chances with the general electorate. More likely, the 69-year old Nelson will just retire. Chance of a switch: 5-10 percent.

#1. Olympia Snowe – For all the talk of a switch among Democrats, the most likely switch probably comes from the Republicans. Snowe had to be watching with horror as Arlen Specter left the party in advance of a surefire primary loss, and then fellow moderates Lisa Murkowski and Mike Castle lost Senate primaries to very conservative candidates. Her party has nominated a very conservative candidate for governor in two successive elections, as Maine moderate and liberal Republicans have switched their registration to Independent or Democrat.

She’s already cast a vote for a version of the health care bill, which makes her odds of surviving a primary challenge in 2012 fairly slim. But she also has to fear the “Specter treatment;” if she were going to make this move, it probably would have made more sense to make it in early 2009, giving her four years to build up her Democratic credentials. Chance of a switch: 15-20 percent.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/11/01/what_happens_in_a_50-50_senate_107795.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Probably that asshole Lieberman will switch Rethug n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Biden breaks ties!
Woohoo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. A 50-50 Senate goes to the party that controls the WH because the VP
breaks the tie. But all of those switches are possible as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Party switchers have to be wary of being primaried by tea-baggers
I suspect Nelson/Lieberman would like their odds better as Democrats. Biden would break the tie but last time the Senate was tied, they formed a power sharing agreement with equal committee representation but the majority gets the gavels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. A 50-50 split would cause Joe Biden to spend a LOT more time in the Senate for the next 2 years
If both parties can hold all their senators to party-line votes, VP Biden would have to cast tie-breaking votes

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nothing. In this Senate, the republican agenda will pass; probably a lot of vetos. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'd prefer a 50/50 senate ONLY if we keep the HOUSE.
Then we can have Biden pass all the votes and we're good at 51 majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Don't they basically know ahead of time what the vote will be?
Edited on Tue Nov-02-10 05:21 PM by gmoney
I've always been under the impression, maybe from the movies, that they know how all the senators will vote before a bill is actually BROUGHT to vote, so they probably don't even bring things to vote that aren't likely to pass.

Plus, everything is going to be filibustered forevermore until one party or the other gets about 62 or so seats so it's filibuster-proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Everyone knows the veep breaks senate ties
maybe that wasn't what you asking, I apologize for not reading the entirety of your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. 50 Democrats? More like 45 + 5 DINOS
Interesting scenario though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC