Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Big ED: President Obama has now become the problem he is WEAK!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:26 PM
Original message
Big ED: President Obama has now become the problem he is WEAK!!
Edited on Wed Dec-01-10 12:31 PM by bigdarryl
WOW!!! He's on another tirade today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. How is this helping.
If the right-wing want to destroy Obama, whether Obama is weak or strong, there is nothing Obama can do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I agree.
Now I do think he needs to get a hell of a lot tougher the next two years, and show the republicans, and blue dog democrats, that they do not control congress or the WH! But to go and on about him being weak, or we need to run someone else against him in the primaries, or that he is no better than McCain would have been, are nothing more than right wing talking points and they need to stop! It's been the right wing plan to get democrats divided, and they come on her pretending to be democrats and spew their bile, and sadly many democrats buy into their BS!

Yes, the president and congress need to stand up to the republicans, yes they need to regain the faith of the base, and yes it will be a hard road for the next two years, but the man has accomplished a hell of a lot, and he can do a hell of a lot more. We can complain, but we don't have to resort to right wing talking points that are doing nothing more than dividing the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsCorleone Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. It's only helping Ed's career. Noticed a few so-called progressives have gone right
and have been rewarded accordingly. Perhaps, they see the big bucks Beck brings home and are willing to sell out the middle-class to get theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drahthaardogs Donating Member (482 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. Sometimes you have two choices...
1) Fight and get taken down

2) Just get taken down.


I prefer option #1 cause it makes it a lot easier to look at myself in the mirror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. I called Ed yesterday but couldn't hold long enough to say what I wanted to...
I was going to say: Maybe it's not that the president is weak; maybe it's time we stop wondering whether he's naive, playing chess or needs a psychologist and assume that he's doing what he means to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. So, what is it he "means to do?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Exactly what he's doing - maintaining as much of the corporate status quo as possible...
...while tweaking things enough to claim "historic" change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. Do you like big, systemic, revolutionary changes
Edited on Wed Dec-01-10 01:55 PM by Recursion
with all the disruption, chaos, and unintended consequences they cause? I don't. Effective changes happen gradually, and start on the margins. Reagan and Bush didn't get much of the fire-breathing conservative agenda passed, but they changed the direction of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. I think we could easily handle a public option, the reinstating of Glass-Steagall...
...breaking up the big banks, etc., etc. - if the prez actually wanted those things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. Can you imagine how much worse the 2008 crisis would be if Glass-Steagall had still been around?
One of the main reasons we could keep the whole thing from going over a cliff was because, with Glass-Steagall repealed, retail banks could step in and buy the troubled investment banks (BoA with Merrill, etc.) The banks that got into trouble weren't the ones that had been regulated by Glass-Steagall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Lady Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Whatever
I've had it with Big Ed, he had a chance to put his name on the ballot and run for senate and he punked out. He needs to sit his ass down somewhere. He wasn't willing to get in the game,just sit on the side line and be a part of the bitch patrol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. !
Agreed! And welcome to DU, Carolina Lady! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Lady Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. thank you,
I recently discovered this site and like it for the most part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Republicans like Ed always throw out the "Weak" card when leaders don't bomb the globe
Fuck him. He's been unlistenable for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Actually, this president is "bombing the globe." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. snap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. LOL
Snap? :rofl:

How's that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. U.S. 'secret war' expands globally as Special Operations forces take larger role
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. Translation....
It wasn't *that* clever.

Thanks for the link, nonetheless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. this is hardly about bombing the globe--O is already doing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Last I checked, Obama inherited two wars and can't just leave like it's a video game
I support getting the hell out of Iraq and Afghanistan and don't support the current policy.

Perhaps I needed to add "start endless wars"... my bad.

That said, Big Ed is one that never seems to do his homework and always goes for the low hanging fruit of hyperbolic horseshit. Jus' sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. He could have stopped those wars as soon as he became president...
The truth is, he is as caught up in the mic as the presidents before him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Just like a video game, huh...
Edited on Wed Dec-01-10 01:44 PM by zulchzulu
It's not that simple.

In order to stop the war, he needs votes. He's not a monarch. Last I checked...

That said, I could show you photos of me in San Francisco protesting the wars back in 2003 and send some MP3s of songs I've written where I obviously show my dislike of these wars...

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I'm tired of the excuses - he'd find a way to end the wars IF he wanted to...
...which, very clearly, he does not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Is it true that Big Ed is still a registered republican someone posted that on hear a week ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. The President is WEAK!!
Edited on Wed Dec-01-10 12:47 PM by ProSense
WEAK!! I tell you!!

Dear America: The President is WEAK!!

Did I say WEAK!!?

Friggin clowns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. "This is your opportunity to link to a list of 297 items"
Who are you and why does this seem to bother you? I never actually counted the accomplishments.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Discontent sells. nt
Edited on Wed Dec-01-10 12:51 PM by Bobbie Jo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
46. +1...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
18. For a weak POTUS he sure had gotten a shitload done in a short time.
Ed's off his meds again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. With the Democratic "base" doing all the legwork, who needs Republican enemies?
Keep parroting the "message", Mouseketeers! Join your Republican bretheren in a common cause.

Get this silly, weak, spineless tool to step aside.

:eyes:

I want to bookmark all this crap for later on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Seriously, I am pretty much fed up with the circular firing squad. It never ends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Sure it does. It ends when the GOP takes over again
Edited on Wed Dec-01-10 01:52 PM by Recursion
Then we all go back to our own little ideological fiefdoms.

Same thing that happened to the GOP; they essentially disintegrated by the end of Bush's term with the far right absolutely giving up on W and the other "moderate" Republicans for trying too hard for bipartisanship, being weak, not "fighting" enough, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Name the last Republican president who tried to get healthcare reform and tried to end gay hate laws
Edited on Wed Dec-01-10 01:47 PM by zulchzulu
I bet you have the list at the ready...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Nixon
Edited on Wed Dec-01-10 01:52 PM by Recursion
I actually agree with your point, but I think that description fits RMN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. Word. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. +1,000,000,000,000
Let's defeat Obama by lying about him and playing hyperbolic horse dung lies on him.

After all, we all want our ponies now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
36. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
30. You know who's weak? Big Fucking Ed.
I know he enjoys his tirades and thinks going for the low hanging hyperbolic drivel can fill in a few hours on his show and maybe even some I Want My Pony Losers can call his show and whine about how they can't have a monarch for President.

This shit is sickening. And Ed is unlistenable...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. +1
sometimes he seems like our version of "Rush".

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
37. With all the donkey droppings being flung all it does is slide down the wall to the ground.
Edited on Wed Dec-01-10 02:33 PM by political_Dem
Yet, the flingers have as much consideration for "collateral damage" as Cheney does.

And while the flinging goes on, another day goes by that the Dems lose to fight for the court of opinion about a Progressive agenda in the MSM as well as supporting politicians who could help win back seats in Congress.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
42. Well he's right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
43. You know who was weak?
Bush. Bush was weak because he couldn't pass the Social Security bill he was pushing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Or immigration reform
And he wasn't willing to "fight" and "force a filibuster" (from conservatives' perspective) with his tax cuts, so he used reconciliation, which is why they will automatically disappear on January 1st. And, yes, he was accused on conservative forums of caving in and secretly being a Democrat at heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC