|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 12:06 PM Original message |
Did Feingold vote with the Republicans again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. Why? What is his reason, do you know? I don't see how ANYBODY could vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I am guessing he is against extending any tax cuts- he is fiscally responsible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 12:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I hope that is his reasoning, he is a head scratcher sometimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 12:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I hope that is his reasoning, he is a head scratcher sometimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 12:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I can see his point, then, but these are desperate times. I wonder how much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 12:58 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. 3.3 trillion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 01:56 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Seriously? Wow. I'm almost tempted to agree with him, then. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 02:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. the total has been reported as 4 trillion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 02:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Boy, that's a tough one. So many of us need the break, but if it could help decrease |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 02:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. The cuts have to be paid for that's the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 02:54 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I have consistantly argued that all the cuts should be removed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grumgrum (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
6. Clearly its because he wants these Tax Cuts to Die across the Board -- He's a Good Man! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 01:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Hear, hear! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 01:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. + infinity! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 03:55 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. He apparently wants the unemployed to die along with them, of starvation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aramchek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
11. he's just sooooo principled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
14. I tend to agree, no cuts for anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
17. Indeed he did. Along with ConservaDems Ben Nelson, Jim Webb, Joe LIeberman and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 11:41 AM Response to Reply #17 |
21. I will. There are not that many people who are as principled as he is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
19. He did it because he opposes ALL tax cuts. It makes sense. We cannot afford tax cuts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
20. An honest man who recognizes we can afford these tax cuts and vote accordingly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:46 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC