Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The White House has been trying to BREAKUP the US Chamber of Commerce

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 11:14 AM
Original message
The White House has been trying to BREAKUP the US Chamber of Commerce
Simple question for those of you calling Obama a corporatist or a shill for big business, if that were the case why in the hell would the White House be attempting to break up the US Chamber of Commerce by having Valerie Jarrett urge members to quit?

It so easy to throw stones at the White House, its a little more challenging to actually pay attention to some of the moves behind the scenes.

For those on the left who live to criticize Obama and call him names at every juncture something like this undermines the whole weak, feckless, corporatist meme.

I look forward to the "yes, buts" from the critics.

White House pressured Chamber in dispute, sources say

By Peter Nicholas, Tribune Washington Bureau

December 2, 2010|5:33 p.m.


WASHINGTON —Since taking office nearly two years ago, President Obama has frequently clashed with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a major business group that has plowed millions of dollars into opposing his plans to overhaul the healthcare and impose new regulations on Wall Street.

Obama and his aides have criticized the group publicly. But the administration's campaign to neutralize the group went farther, according to new detail about the dispute.

Over the last year the White House has hosted meetings with business leaders to discuss policy, and in some of those sessions asked that they persuade the Chamber to cancel TV ads aimed at defeating Obama's healthcare plan, said a business lobbyist familiar with the matter.

Illustrating the depth of the dispute, the White House also asked corporate executives to drop their membership in the Chamber, the lobbyist said. Last fall, the Chamber received reports that the White House — including senior advisor Valerie Jarrett — had spoken to some executives about resigning from the Chamber, the business lobbyist said, speaking on condition of anonymity to avoid becoming personally entangled in the conflict. A second source said there had been discussions at the Chamber regarding the White House urging resignations.
-snip-

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/sc-dc-1203-obama-chamber-20101202,0,5954369.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kneecap them. Excellent.
There were a few that pulled out before the election, hopefully more to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. There's a lot that goes on that we're not privy to, or it slips under the radar, so
that's why I usually give O the benefit of the doubt -- hoping/assuming he's "working on it", whatever "it" may happen to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. After serving in a senior capacity in the executive branch of state government I learned. . .
. . .there is a lot things going on behind the scenes that ofter go counter to public perception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R.....The US Chamber is not our friend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. He's an anti-corporatist corporatist!...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. US Chamber of Outsourcing
is anti-American!

They should at least change their name to reflect what the Chamber is all about now, which is outsourcing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sounds like trying to talk militant rascist out of the KKK.
They may leave but they just set up shop under a different name with the same goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. I am doubtful of this article.
This is all speculations IMO. No hard evidence was given to prove that it is the case that the WH was trying to do this. If it is true then why the recent attempts at reconciliation?

Is it that the issues or problems no longer exist or has the WH decided that it is better to realign with the chamber - IOW cave? Also why would the WH urge and get some companies to quit the chamber and turn around to make up with the chamber so quickly - what then happens to the companies that quit? I guess they will have to run back with their tails tucked in-between their hind legs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. If Obama doesn't have the votes in the Senate its not caving. . .
. . .and if he does nothing he just pases the ball off to a Republican controlled Congress which will make it worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Nothing has been done yet, but...
If congress passes a bill to extend the tax cuts to the rich and Obama vetoes it, that's not caving. If he vetoes it and gets over-ridden, so be it, but he'll have done what he said he would do. I think a veto of a crap bill (as is likely to get passed) would be the shot across the bow that the GOP sorely needs to remind them who was elected to be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetapogee Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. if congress
passes a bill this session to extend the tax cuts, it will be by necessity a bi-partisan bill and the President will face an uprising in his own party if he vetoes it.

In other words, don't get your hopes up. The best thing for the President is letting the tax breaks expire, but this is up to congress. The congressional dems and especially approx half of the 21 dem senators up for re-election in 2012 just want this whole issue to simply go away. For that reason, in my mind the only question that isn't answered yet is how long, how many years will the tax break extension be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks for this info, very interesting nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. Because they are funding republican elections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumgrum Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. Asking politely to quit is STUPID -- As dumb as the Admin reading letters to the Insurers so they
Edited on Sun Dec-05-10 02:27 PM by grumgrum
can be nice and not drop people with health conditions. They make money off denying claims so reading letters of pain is a waste of time. If this is leadership we are screwed. What you need is to write bills and pressure to get those laws passed ot make sure things like the Chamber dont have such power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. So then Obama hands the Chamber a gift in the form of the NAFTA-style S. Korean free trade deal
Obama gave the job-offshorers exactly what they wanted. Is that part of the strategy to "break up" the US Chamber of Commerce?

http://finchannel.com/Main_News/Business/76821_U.S._Chamber%E2%80%99s_Donohue_Urges_New_Congress_to_Swiftly_Pass_Korea-U.S._FTA_/



U.S. Chamber’s Donohue Urges New Congress to Swiftly Pass Korea-U.S. FTA

04/12/2010 11:44 (1 Day 14:32 minutes ago)

The FINANCIAL -- The new Congress should make passage of the Korea-U.S. free trade agreement (KORUS) an immediate and urgent priority, according to U.S. Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Thomas J. Donohue, who welcomed the news that negotiators have effectively addressed lingering concerns regarding bilateral trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. Break up the Chamber? Good idea.
Break up the Chamber because they oppose the disastrous, probably unconstitutional health insurance company enrichment act? Not so good.

I prefer to break the broken clock when it's wrong, not when it's right. I give the administration little credit for fighting the Chamber on this issue. Fighting the chamber, in general, though? Good idea.

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
18. "why in the hell would the White House be attempting to break up the US Chamber of Commerce"
"by having Valerie Jarrett urge members to quit?"

Because the Chamber of Commerce are actively fighting Obama's goals with the end result that he fails and he can be replaced by another W.

Obama can still be a corporate shill and be opposed by totally right-wing nut-jobs.

When it comes to his own political survival, TeamObama is a tiger.

Fighting for the working class or people losing their houses? Yeah, not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. That's why the White House got the Chamber's endorsment for his NAFTA like Korea trade deal.
Edited on Sun Dec-05-10 07:46 PM by Better Believe It

Thomas J. Donohue, U.S. Chamber of Commerce President and CEO

“This agreement will create thousands of new jobs, advance our national goal of doubling exports in five years, and demonstrate that America is once again ready to lead on trade. The administration has done its part. Now it’s time for the new Congress to make passage of KORUS a top priority in January. We will do everything in our power to round up the votes.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. +1 (for the truth).
The idea that the White House is trying to "break up" the Chamber is patently ludicrous.

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
21. How'd that fight with the CofC work out..? As well as everything else, looks like. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC